How dead are the Bill of Rights?
1st Amendment: | no establishment of religion | 20% dead | Lemon v. Kurtman Test is appropriate though religious fanatics on local level increasingly ignoring the law. |
1st Amendment | free exercise of religion | 80% dead | Employment Division v. Smith allows government to regulate religion to enforce a compelling state interest. |
1st Amendment | free speech | 70% dead | 5 major areas of exceptions now exist; as well as time, place and manner rules; and special context rules. |
1st Amendment | free press | 10% dead | Courts often use gag orders to prevent news coverage of trials. |
1st Amendment | right to assemble/petition | 70% dead | HUD Housing efforts |
2nd Amendment | right to bear arms | 90% dead | Crime Bill of 1994 banned 19 types of semi-automatic rifles. |
3rd Amendment | no quartering of soldiers | 0% dead | |
4th Amendment | no searches without warrants | 100% dead | Limited by definition of reasonable expectation of privacy; 11 exceptions to warrant requirement; and United States v. Leon good faith rule. *In 1995, Congress completely obliterated this Amendment. It no longer has any force and effect. |
5th Amendment | Grand jury indictment required | 0% dead | * 0%, but grand juries are now usually stacked with pro-prosecution regulars who do not know how to exercise their roles as grand jurists. |
5th Amendment | no double jeopardy | 80% dead | The Wheeler and Heath cases allow prosecution by the Feds and multiple states while the Blockburger line of cases allows multiple prosecutions resulting from the same conduct. |
5th Amendment | privilege against self-incrimination | 40% dead | The Schmerber and Muniz cases have reduced this protection to only the extremely limited category of testimonial evidence. |
5th Amendment | due process | 100% dead | Expanded way beyond original intent to create bureaucratic nightmare. * Made more evident when in 1996, the Supreme Court allowed all regions of government to seize property without any due process and allowed the ignorance of the 'can not take private property without compensation' clause. |
6th Amendment | speedy trial | 90% dead | Under Barker v. Wingo Test defendants have been made to wait as long as seven years before trial takes place. |
6th Amendment | right to jury (criminal case) | 30% dead | Batson line of cases places rights of jurors over the fair trial rights of defendants. |
6th Amendment | confrontation by witnesses | 100% dead | Maryland v. Craig allows witnesses to testify from other rooms or even on videotape without any chance to cross examine. |
6th Amendment | right to counsel | 10% dead | Applies only in cases where actual incarceration is imposed. |
7th Amendment | right to jury (civil case) | 0% dead | |
8th Amendment | no cruel or unusual punishment | 100% dead | Expanded by liberals well beyond its intended meaning, which has resulted in codling criminals. |
8th Amendment | no excessive bail or fines | 100% dead | Both excessive fines and bail are regularly used now. |
9th Amendment | nondisparagement clause | 100% dead | Expanded by liberals well beyond its intended meaning. |
10th Amendment | reserved powers clause | 100% dead | Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority killed the 10th Amendment, and all hopes for control over congressional power. |
*editors comments.
**information provided by 'The Rape of the American Constitution', by Chuck Shiver, published by Loompanics Unlimited.
btt for index
I'll admit that our court system is flawed but get raided on a faulty warrant (exclusionary rule exceptions or not) and see how fast a decent lawyer can get that case kicked. Look at Randy Weaver. The feds had him cold, or so they thought until Jerry Spence took his case for free and merely pointed out the flaws in the governments case without even presenting his own defense. Not Guilty and a state level indictment against the federal agents who perpetrated the crime. Admittedly Clinton's Justice Dept had them wiggle out of it, but still. The 4th is NOT dead. No way.
The 5th and the others are in a state of constant flux but I don't think you can call them dead based merely on case law. Why? Because there are companies that make a fortune selling case law updates on a monthly basis to law firms and law schools all over the country and a CURRENT case, right on point is what makes or breaks a trial.
I got as far as Second Amendment is 90% dead and stopped reading as I find the “conclusions” irrational and suspect.
He lost me with the gratuitous “religious fanatics” comment.
Alright. Before we go consuming material published by Loompanics, it should be noted that this is the SAME publishing operation that gave that notorious — and egregiously wrong — tax evader, Irwin Schiff, a platform by publishing his amusing work “The Federal Mafia”.
To assert that Loompanics is source of highly credible material requires — how shall I say it? — the “suspension of disbelief”.
Not saying all of what you posted is invalid, just that the specific cite doesn’t help the case you were making.