Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain offers a bold, pro-market agenda for America (including the Flat Tax!)
The Manchester Union Leader ^ | May 27, 2008 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 05/26/2008 11:54:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

WHILE AMERICANS focus on the interminable Clinton-Obama celebrity death match, Sen. John McCain is using clear-headed, compellingly crafted speeches to propose surprisingly bold, free-market ideas. With one huge exception, the Arizona Republican advocates more limited, open government as his Democratic rivals promise tax hikes and an even-busier state. Voters should welcome this stark contrast.

On spending, John McCain would rule with a tight fist.

"There will be no more subsidies for special pleaders -- no more corporate welfare -- no more throwing around billions of dollars of the people's money on pet projects, while the people themselves are struggling to afford their homes, groceries, and gas," McCain said April 15 in Pittsburgh. "I will veto every bill with earmarks, until the Congress stops sending bills with earmarks," McCain continued. "I will seek a constitutionally valid line-item veto to end the practice once and for all." More impressive, McCain said, "We will institute a one-year pause in discretionary spending increases with the necessary exemption of military spending and veterans' benefits."

Such prudence would be a welcome relief from the Bush/GOP Congress years that did for fiscal responsibility what the Playboy Mansion has done for sexual restraint.

McCain's budget discipline would make it easier to cut taxes. He wants to make President Bush's tax cuts permanent. He would slice corporate taxes from 35 to 25 percent. He also would scrap the Alternative Minimum Tax, double the dependents' exemption from $3,500 to $7,000, "and sign into law a reform agenda to permit the first-year expensing of new equipment and technology."

Most significantly, he would let Americans choose to file taxes under today's rules or volunteer for a simpler, flatter rate, perhaps at 25 or 15 percent.

Regarding health care, McCain warned in Tampa, Fla., on April 29 that his opponents "urge universal coverage, with all the tax increases, new mandates, and government regulation that come along with that idea. But in the end, this will accomplish one thing only. We will replace the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of the current system with the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of a government monopoly."

Instead, McCain believes that "the key to real reform is to restore control over our health-care system to the patients themselves." He would expand Health Savings Accounts, and more dramatically, offer a tax credit of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to help Americans purchase their own coverage, even across state lines. McCain added, "It would be yours and your family's health-care plan, and yours to keep."

McCain also calls for reining in the misguided, multi-trillion-dollar Medicare drug plan.

"People like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet don't need their prescriptions underwritten by taxpayers," McCain observed. "This reform alone will save billions of dollars that could be returned to taxpayers or put to better use."

There is a cautionary note among these encouraging signs: John McCain has beer-bonged the Kool-Aid on global warming.

"We need to deal with the central facts of rising temperatures, rising waters, and all the endless troubles that global warming will bring," McCain said May 12 at a Portland, Ore., wind-power research facility.

He desires "a cap-and-trade system to change the dynamic of our energy economy." His specific goal is to reduce CO2 60 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Former Virginia state climatologist Dr. Patrick Michaels estimated in the May 16 Washington Times that this would lower per-capita emissions "to 19th Century levels."

Before relegating America's mid-21st Century economy to the norms of the Grover Cleveland era, McCain should heed the expanding caucus of experts who believe so-called "global warming" is exaggerated, if it even exists.

On May 19, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine released a petition signed by 31,072 Americans scientists, including 9,021 Ph.D.s. They reject the idea that CO2 is boiling Earth. So much for climate science being "settled."

One hopes McCain will listen on this issue. Just as he recently has warmed to tax cuts, perhaps he will cool on "global warming."

Nonetheless, McCain will remain a mixed bag. Sometimes he will annoy the Right. Other times, he boldly will go where no GOP standard bearer has gone since Ronald Reagan. As a wise man said, "John McCain is not perfect. Just perfect enough."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at Deroy.Murdock@gmail.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 25; alternative; congress; deroymurdock; election; elections; flattax; healthcare; mccain; obama; taxes; unthinkable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: cyberella; Quix; Joya

‘MCCAIN BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS UNTHINKABLE’

Well put.


61 posted on 05/28/2008 8:18:13 AM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joya; DoughtyOne
‘MCCAIN BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS UNTHINKABLE’

Well put.

That's exactly what RINO is counting on. Real conservatives selling out and voting for him out of fear of an Obama regime.

Well, not me.

You need to wake up. McNut not just pandering to the left with his global warming speeches and such. He IS the left.

62 posted on 05/28/2008 9:00:20 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cyberella; Quix; Joya

‘MCCAIN BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS UNTHINKABLE’

Utter and complete garbage.

This is the BOB DOLE STRATEGY.

This strategy did not work against an impeached, sex maniac, ultimatly DISBARRED LIAR and YET

doing the SAME FAILED STRATEGY IS GOING TO GET A DIFFERENT RESULT?!

That is the height of delusion.

McCain can ONLY WIN BY OFFERING SOMETHING TO VOTE FOR!

McCain is just a mee too rino.

This is the garbage that gave us 2006: DINO ALWAYS TRUMPS RINO.

enjoy your obama.


63 posted on 05/28/2008 9:08:10 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

come on...it’s obviously not as good as the fair tax, but it’s a step towards it.


64 posted on 05/28/2008 9:10:49 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The only way the Federal Government can get more than 20% of GDP is the Fair Tax. Raise taxes and you get less GDP and even less tax revenue.
Hauser’s Law is like gravity. It cannot be denied!


65 posted on 05/28/2008 9:26:35 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway; Joya

Well, that’s the way we see it at least.


66 posted on 05/28/2008 9:37:42 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Votes to Pass Leftist Policy: McCain Senators 90, House 375 / Obama Senators 58, House 275.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The current income tax code that we are languishing under started out as a Flat Tax too. Given that the code has been changed 16,000 times since the last "tax reform" that happened in 1986, I'd give a Flat Tax less than one week before some K Street lobbyist pays off enough members of Congress to start changing the code again. The Flat Tax doesn't go far enough to fix our broken system.

A truly viable tax reform proposal must address the following three end-goals:


Thus far, only one tax reform proposal addresses all three of those issues: the FairTax.
67 posted on 05/28/2008 9:41:44 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon

McCain does not care if it is real or fake.

McCain runs all issues through the RINO “What will give me power” lenses.

Thus he supports amnesty because he thinks it will give him the hispanic vote.

Global warming gives him the hippy vote.

it is all about him standing out more than others for his own power.

I would suspect his support of victory is more about his own keeping a job rather than constitutional principles and liberty.


68 posted on 05/28/2008 9:50:24 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fabian
come on...it’s obviously not as good as the fair tax, but it’s a step towards it.

There's no need to settle for only a step towards The Fair Tax when there is an option to enact The Fair Tax.
69 posted on 05/28/2008 10:18:39 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DManA

“Most significantly, he would let Americans choose to file taxes under today’s rules or volunteer for a simpler, flatter rate, perhaps at 25 or 15 percent.”

“So now you have to do your taxes twice to see wich way costs less. Great.”

I think you are forgetting about the AMT. In many cases, you would have to calculate your taxes 3 times. BTW, if you like a parallel flat tax system, you should love the AMT.


70 posted on 05/28/2008 10:19:39 AM PDT by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bold? I don’t really see how that word belongs in a description of the campaign platform of someone advocating a flat income tax option. That proposal is certainly not “bold” and it also is not politically viable.

As we move deeper into the 21st century, globalization will become recognized for the megatrend that it is. To continue into that environment with a tax system which places our producers at a disadvantage in a marketplace that is growing more and more global with each passing week is insane - and certainly not “bold”.


71 posted on 05/28/2008 12:22:19 PM PDT by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joya

reminder


72 posted on 05/30/2008 8:33:43 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

OK, hot shot. So what do you suggest? Or you’re just hollering at me hoping McCain will overhear and offer the voters something?


73 posted on 06/05/2008 12:34:07 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

Re your post #62. What do you suggest? Moving to Alaska and seceding from the Union?


74 posted on 06/05/2008 12:35:10 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson