To: NormsRevenge
What worries Rowan and other defense attorneys is the possibility that an innocent man could be executed Yeah, sure.
2 posted on
05/26/2008 1:36:31 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(The road to hell is paved with euphemisms.)
To: NormsRevenge
Does “wrongfully convicted” mean “total innocence” or the use of a loophole??
3 posted on
05/26/2008 1:36:31 PM PDT by
Sacajaweau
("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
To: NormsRevenge
Since 1973, 129 people have walked off death rows in 26 states after evidence proved they were wrongfully convicted Don't forget how often we're assured that these are the cases that get the greatest care. Makes you wonder about the rest -- think Nifong?
4 posted on
05/26/2008 1:38:38 PM PDT by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
To: NormsRevenge
5 posted on
05/26/2008 1:45:00 PM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: NormsRevenge
I just wish they’d get around to that cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal. I can’t believe that people defend this scum, and completely disregard the victim, the cop this scum killed. This world is bass-ackwards anymore in so many ways. Defending murderous scum, while trying to push ever closer to outright killing innocent babies, even after a live birth, or killing sick and elderly people in the name of “cost effectiveness”. God has got to judge this sick world before much longer.
9 posted on
05/26/2008 1:59:12 PM PDT by
mrsmel
To: NormsRevenge
The case against
Terry Lyn Short isn't as air tight as one would wish in a capital murder case. The odds are he probably did what he was convicted of, but there is a little room for doubt, IMHO.
12 posted on
05/26/2008 2:01:22 PM PDT by
xJones
To: NormsRevenge
Florida leads all states with 22 exonerations, followed by 18 in Illinois.These numbers look like commutations rather that exonerate and release.
15 posted on
05/26/2008 3:35:03 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Ted Kennedy is the finest collection of hops and barley money can buy)
To: NormsRevenge
I do believe that the criteria for a guilty verdict is “within reasonable doubt”...
Not, “beyond absolute certainty”!
Correct me if I wrong.
20 posted on
05/26/2008 5:07:14 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
(Arrogance IS my virtue!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson