Skip to comments.
Court: Texas had no right to take polygamists' kids 3 minutes ago
AP via Yahoo ^
| 5/22/08
Posted on 05/22/2008 10:46:31 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,321-1,331 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
I quit posting to the FLDS threads. It was hopeless trying to explain the concept of due process and constitutional rights to the self-righteous on those threads. I even made a sarcastic remark about ‘gettin’ muh rope to string ‘em up’ and got kudos for it! They couldn’t see the irony or that they were pursuing a lynch mob mentality.
661
posted on
05/22/2008 5:34:08 PM PDT
by
antceecee
(where do we go from here Ollie?.)
To: CatherinePPP
If an ordinary joe was doing this in his house hed have been hauled off to jail years ago and the girls sent to new homes. Never been to the city before, eh?
662
posted on
05/22/2008 5:35:03 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: CharlesWayneCT
The pro-CPS folks were rude and condescending, but I saw NO evidence they would match your description.It goes beyond rude and condescending. For example, just a few posts above, a pro-CPS person told another FR member "why don't you go join NAMBLA?" Similar ad hominem attacks of a truly contemptible nature have been par for the course among the gang who seem to have made it their full-time job to defend the government seizure of 465 children.
They are good people who really do care for the children, who simply dont see the harm in what the CPS did.
Anyone who doesn't recognize the fundamental necessity for the rule of law and the protection of constitutional rights is a dangerous liberal in my book. Of course all dangerous liberals say "it's for the children." That only makes them more dangerous.
But your attempt to be charitable is appreciated, nonetheless, as an example we could all do to imitate.
To: atruelady
You have just said that all Christian children are being raped, forced to bear children at young ages and forced into spiritual marriages not knowing the difference because they are brainwashedUS clerics accused of abuse from 1950-2002: 4,392.
Individuals making accusations: 10,667.
Victims' ages: 5.8% under 7; 16% ages 8-10; 50.9% ages 11-14; 27.3% ages 15-17.
Victims' gender: 81% male, 19% female
Duration of abuse: Among victims, 38.4% said all incidents occurred within one year; 21.8% said one to two years; 28%, two to four years; 11.8% longer.
Victims per priest: 55.7% with one victim; 26.9% with two or three; 13.9% with four to nine; 3.5% with 10 or more (these 149 priests caused 27% of allegations).
Abuse locations: 40.9% at priest's residence; 16.3% in church; 42.8% elsewhere.
Known cost to dioceses and religious orders: $572,507,094 (does not include the $85 million Boston settlement and other expenses after research was concluded). (Hartford Courant, 2/27/04)
664
posted on
05/22/2008 5:35:50 PM PDT
by
Soliton
To: tobyhill
Yep, and a couple of the women thought to be underage were actually in their early twenties. CPS said they had no documents, then it turns out the women had Utah driver’s licenses and Utah birth certificates that backed up their claims. Oops on CPS.
665
posted on
05/22/2008 5:36:20 PM PDT
by
Utah Girl
(John 15:12, Matthew 5:44)
To: El Gato
It is refreshing to see others speaking up after so many were silenced by a small government can do no wrong mob that squelched questions by cruel accusations.
666
posted on
05/22/2008 5:36:43 PM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Let the socialists duke it out. All three of them.)
To: atruelady; HeartlandOfAmerica
I cant find anyone to tell me where Texas lied and is denying due process As if lying is the only problem.
If they operated in good faith, then the officers and the judge are incompetent.
667
posted on
05/22/2008 5:36:50 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: GovernmentShrinker
If the FLDS can get all these kids sent back to them with no strings attached, whats to stop NAMBLA from setting up an isolated compound in Texas to keep their kids hidden in for their own sick purposes? Application of Texas law under individual due process? Although Texas sodomy laws have been overturned, by the federal courts under the emanations from the penumbra of the federal Constitution, those against child sexual abuse are still in force.
668
posted on
05/22/2008 5:38:20 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: mad_as_he$$
669
posted on
05/22/2008 5:38:32 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Saundra Duffy
By design? Perhaps. An Approved Government religion? For now.
670
posted on
05/22/2008 5:39:22 PM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Let the socialists duke it out. All three of them.)
To: Maximilian
Of course all dangerous liberals say "it's for the children." 
671
posted on
05/22/2008 5:40:39 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Saundra Duffy
I am glad the Baptists provided the buses to help out. I understood that there weren’t many available, and the First Baptist Church also provided care for the children. Good people...Thank you for the video.
672
posted on
05/22/2008 5:42:02 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
But hey, its not a tank though, right? They needed protection from rattle snakes.
673
posted on
05/22/2008 5:42:13 PM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Let the socialists duke it out. All three of them.)
To: B4Ranch
What Im getting at is it wont be long before CAIR demands we permit Sharia Law for the Muslim community residing in the US. Their equivalent in Jolly Olde already has IIRC. Our time is coming, but unlike the Brits, Americans are armed, quite well armed in fact.
674
posted on
05/22/2008 5:42:21 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: DoughtyOne
If you dont do it right, you stand to jeopardize the whole case. And here we are. Very well said.
675
posted on
05/22/2008 5:42:37 PM PDT
by
Utah Girl
(John 15:12, Matthew 5:44)
To: Utah Girl
What many people here on FR fail to understand is that freedom is more important than the trumped up stuff and made up “facts” that are being released by the CPS.
We must not surrender to the government minions that demand to rule every aspect of our lives.
676
posted on
05/22/2008 5:43:15 PM PDT
by
Old Mountain man
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
To: Balding_Eagle
You weren't the only one...but I took comfort in how other people noted how foolish and childish they were when they tried their ad hominem garbage.
677
posted on
05/22/2008 5:44:30 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Old Mountain man
Yes. But many look to the government to missionary them and to control theirs and others lives in sanctimony.
678
posted on
05/22/2008 5:45:00 PM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Let the socialists duke it out. All three of them.)
To: plain talk
I don't know all the details unlike many kneejerks on this thread. hehehe
679
posted on
05/22/2008 5:45:07 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: JLS
So you think the Texas CPS withheld evidence from the Texas appeals court? That would not be a very good strategy for an agency that must continually go before the courts of the state of Texas.I don't know whether this happened in this case in Texas, but it happens plenty in other states. When the parents don't get to attend or have a rep at the hearing before the judge, it's much easier to pull off.
680
posted on
05/22/2008 5:46:30 PM PDT
by
jabchae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,321-1,331 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson