Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fury as Museum Bosses Cover Up Naked Egyptian Mummies to Protect 'Sensitivities' of Visitors
dailymail.co.uk ^ | May 21, 2008 | Jaya Narain

Posted on 05/21/2008 12:15:27 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

The last time they had the chance to offend anyone was 2,700 years ago when they were wandering around ancient Egypt.

Since then the mummies have led a blameless existence, spending the last 120 years in a museum where countless thousands of visitors have managed to see them without anyone becoming in the least bit upset.

Not any longer, it appears.

Complaints have led to the naked remains of Asru, a chantress at the Temple of Amun in Karnak, plus the partially-wrapped male Khary and a child mummy, all being covered in shrouds to protect their modesty.

The decision, which has prompted wholesale derision, came after Manchester Museum said it had received 'feedback' from the public saying it was 'insensitive to display unwrapped mummies'.

Having ordered the cover up, managers claim they are following Government policy and are carrying out a public consultation.

Last night the museum, whose Egyptian department has a worldwide reputation, was accused of being ridiculous and told it risked becoming a 'laughing stock'. Mummies at Manchester Museum

Naked truth: Mummies at Manchester Museum are being covered up after visitors complained about them being displayed 'naked'

Bob Partridge, chairman of the Manchester Ancient Egypt Society, said the cover-up was 'absolutely incomprehensible'.

'The mummies have always been sensitively displayed and have been educational and informative to generations of visitors.

"We are shocked this has been done in advance of any results from the public."

Josh Lennon, a museum visitor, said: "This is preposterous. Surely people realise that if they go to see Egyptian remains some of them may not be dressed in their best bib and tucker.

"The museum response to complaints is pure Monty Python - they have now covered them from head to foot rendering the exhibition a non-exhibition. It is hilarious."

Manchester Museum has several mummies - embalmed bodies tightly wrapped in cotton bandages - and is home to one of the most important collections in Britain.

George Mutter, a professor at Harvard medical school in the U.S. said: "For decades the Manchester Museum has been a leader in the scientific study of human mummies.

"The decision to hide the mummies from view is a step backwards."

He added: "In the interest of inclusiveness, the museum has become a playground for those who do not understand the subject at hand, nor respect the interests of scientists and public alike."

But the museum's Nick Merriman said: "We get a stream of feedback saying it is insensitive to display unwrapped mummies.

"We are trying to follow Government guidelines about how they should be displayed with respect and sensitivity."

If the public wanted the mummies unwrapped, the museum would take that "very seriously'," he added.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: ancientegypt; godsgravesglyphs; museum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Free ThinkerNY

Darn, just when they were ready for the June “Dead Mummy Lovers” centerfold.


21 posted on 05/21/2008 1:21:15 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Well, I guess the upside of this is that more museums are going to be able to afford a mummy exhibit. I mean, an old manequin, a bed sheet to cover it, and a sign that says “MUMMY” is considerably less expensive than a 2,700 relic that has to be concealed, anyway.


22 posted on 05/21/2008 1:51:39 PM PDT by philled ("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The deceased were never ASKED if they wanted to be put on public display for money naked.

It isn’t always about prudes. It can also be able showing disrespect for a corpse.


23 posted on 05/21/2008 2:05:46 PM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687
My two remaining subscriptions (over 50 years each) are National Geographic and Scientific American and SciAm has become as much of a left-wing agitiator as is NG. :-(

I will not renew either -- and I will let them have both barrels when I tell them why!

24 posted on 05/21/2008 2:26:34 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

:-))


25 posted on 05/21/2008 3:25:46 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues
>>“Dead Mummy Lovers” centerfold

Paging Jeffrey Dahmer

26 posted on 05/21/2008 3:58:07 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter
but what about the dead guy?

I doubt he cares.

It's only been 2,500 years since he was left naked to rot

27 posted on 05/21/2008 4:09:16 PM PDT by Popman ("When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
Nat Geo mag is doomed

Everyone is wearing t-shirts now, anyway. Hang on to your back issues...

28 posted on 05/21/2008 7:46:42 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
There is no need to display the mummies nude. What is the point?

I was incensed enough when long deceased relatives of mine were pried from their coffins beneath the floor of the Chapel at St. Mary's City, MD and shown naked on TV. My mother was horrified.

A little decency goes a long way, and it is not necessary to show the parts of a human corpse on display, (be it media or in a glass case), we would not want to show ourselves walking down the street.

29 posted on 05/21/2008 8:02:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687
"war museum"

My wife and I did exactly that two years ago. Well worth the visit. I also like the fact that all the national museums are free of charge.

30 posted on 05/22/2008 3:03:02 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

ping to 16


31 posted on 05/22/2008 3:32:54 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach

Note: this topic is from deep in the FRchives.



Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


32 posted on 06/09/2013 6:49:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson