Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Narnia' Retreats with Sequel
Box office Mojo ^ | 5/19/08 | Brandon Grey

Posted on 05/19/2008 4:34:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom

The second coming of Narnia had a less passionate opening reception than its predecessor and, being the sole new nationwide release of the weekend, led to one of the softest mid-May periods of the decade in terms of overall foot traffic at the movies.

The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian captured a sizable estimated $56.6 million on approximately 8,400 screens at 3,929 theaters to top the weekend, but the reportedly $200 million sequel heralded a theatrical lull for the franchise based on C.S. Lewis' series of religious fantasy novels. The previous adaptation, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, roared in December 2005 with a $65.6 million start (or over $70 million adjusted for ticket price inflation) from fewer screens and wound up with $291.7 million by the end of its run. The disparity is compounded by the fact that, buoyed by the holidays, first weekend grosses in December generally portend higher final grosses than they do in May.

Despite the success of the Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter series, it was unrealistic to expect Prince Caspian to exceed its predecessor as blockbuster franchises normally don't maintain interest. Beyond The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, Caspian's literary source was not as popular as what propelled Rings and Potter. Storywise, Lord of the Rings was designed as a trilogy while Potter had the recurring school year and coming-of-age themes. With Narnia, Caspian's just another adventure as the first movie had a complete journey. That's how the picture was marketed as well, as no strong villain or new high stakes were presented, and the Prince Caspian character took center stage with no context or reason to care shown for those who haven't read the books.

(Excerpt) Read more at boxofficemojo.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: boxoffice; moviereview; narnia; princecaspian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: G Larry

I saw it this week. Go and support it.


21 posted on 05/19/2008 6:02:54 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America in 1730.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I saw it last night and enjoyed it more than the first. I thought the story moved along more strongly and smoothly than the first one. There were some interesting plot twists. The computer animation was virtually seamless. The Christian themes were evident, but not in your face. Go see this great film.


22 posted on 05/19/2008 6:55:06 AM PDT by Andyman (The truth shall make you freep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Sequels never do as well as the first movie. This is an understood constant.


23 posted on 05/19/2008 7:01:30 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Ironman greatly exceeded my expectations. Thinking about going back. I rarely want to do that.


24 posted on 05/19/2008 7:46:49 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I've done here today doesn't force you to have a negative opinion of me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Sequels never do as well as the first movie. This is an understood constant.

Well, yes and no.

The studios expect some dropoff, but not on this scale. Especially when they up the budget for the sequels.

Doesn't bode well for finishing the series. We'll see, they can still turn this around, but there's some monster competition about to open.

25 posted on 05/19/2008 8:29:11 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It's sandwiched between Ironman and Indy. I enjoyed it, but its appeal is somewhat self-limiting to its original audience.
26 posted on 05/19/2008 8:55:56 AM PDT by Excellence (Daughter of the American Revolution, niece of the Civil War (North).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

We just got the Ironman PS3 game with all the original voices.

I don’t play but Dad does and it’s like a whole new movie!


27 posted on 05/19/2008 9:09:21 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Maybe it’s not surprising this is a retreat. After all most of the TLTWTW audience were evangelical protestants. The allegorical Gospel of Lewis’s fantasy parallel universe was a big draw with Christians of all sorts.

The Narnian analog of the conversion of Constantine (overlaid with a bit of the plot of Hamlet) might be popular with us traditional Christians (whether Orthodox, Latin or the remaining traditionalist Anglicans) but it’s not going to light a fire among the sort of protestants who like vilifying the Equals-to-the-Apostles Helen and Constantine on this board and elsewhere.

I suspect the Voyage of the Dawn Treader (as a meditation on the Holy Mysteries or Sacraments) won’t be a wildly popular one either (though it’s got lots of room for sticking close to the original story and getting in lost of very cinematic special effects).

The protestants should be back in force for the critique of secularism in The Silver Chair (assuming Hollywood has the guts to stick to the story, and leave Puddleglum’s speech unaltered), and the creation and the eschaton.

An even bigger question is whether Hollywood will have the guts to leave Lewis’s implied prophecy that the Antichrist will be a fraud put up by an unholy alliance of secularists and Muslims unaltered when they make The Last Battle.


28 posted on 05/19/2008 11:52:59 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
That part was already dragging, with all the meaningful looks and such.

At least it wasn't the near-slobbery-smoochfest at the end of the LoTR trilogy!

29 posted on 05/19/2008 2:18:20 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Remember the lame-o medals ceremony at the end of Star Wars?

Why couldn’t they just blow up the Death Star and roll the credits?


30 posted on 05/19/2008 2:48:03 PM PDT by gridlock (RNC.com wants you to know... It's OK to vote against Barack Obama...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson