Skip to comments.
Obama: Israel is a 'constant sore'
World Net Daily ^
| May 13 2008
| World Net Daily
Posted on 05/18/2008 9:53:22 AM PDT by Winged Hussar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: pillut48
After these comments, WHY would any self-respecting Jewish American even consider VOTING for this idiot?!? Because he's a Democrat.
WTF does that have to do with anything?
TRADITION!!!
21
posted on
05/18/2008 10:22:16 AM PDT
by
Polybius
To: Vision
There is no way he's gonna be the nominee. It's only the middle of May. Hillary should be all over this. Right. I don't think Obama's going to be able to hide his "CHANGES" and just platitude his way until November. Stuff like this will pop out. At this point it's looking like there's a better chance Hillary rather than McCain will take him to task. McCain looks like he wants to lose the election although even if he tries I don't think he will.
22
posted on
05/18/2008 10:22:32 AM PDT
by
Jim W N
To: Always Right
To: ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; dennisw; nyyankeefan; juliej; OldFriend; Convert from ECUSA; ...
To: Brilliant
25
posted on
05/18/2008 10:31:18 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Winged Hussar
I’m not one to defend Obama, but this article was misleading. What Obama was talking about as being a “constant sore” was not the State of Israel but the Israeli-Arab-Palestinian crisis. That was my impression of the matter after reading what Obama actually said.
So let’s not be like the libs and distort what someone actually meant.
To: ExTexasRedhead
I would say Obama is the “constant sore”.
27
posted on
05/18/2008 10:43:32 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Bobkk47
I don’t think I (or WND) took it out of context. To be spsecific, Obama was referring to Israeli settlements on land that Israel captured from the Arabs after the Arabs provoked the third war in less than 20 years. In other words, he thinks Israel is the problem, just as his sugar daddy George Soros thinks Israel is the problem.
28
posted on
05/18/2008 10:47:19 AM PDT
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: Vision
H. Clinton does not want the worthless Dim nomination this time around. She just wants to be sure Obama loses. He is helping plenty.
She now want to sew up the 2012 nomination by having Obama flame out.
29
posted on
05/18/2008 10:57:28 AM PDT
by
JLS
To: ExTexasRedhead; Clintonfatigued; freekitty; Piquaboy; TXRed; justiceseeker93; romanesq; ...
"...With Hussein Obama (IMO, a closet Muslim radical) and the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Kerry, Schumer, Murtha, and the rest of the Liberal human waste in DC and elsewhere, were doomed. Clueless American voters just havent figured that out yet; that day is fast approaching..."Nagonna happen, Babe! The traitors that you mention are gonna back the beaste soon, as the black&mooslim problem with Osama builds.
And us 'clueless-American-voters' are armed - the dims hate that fact ................ FRegards
30
posted on
05/18/2008 10:59:46 AM PDT
by
gonzo
( What Part Of "Shall Not Be Infringed" does anyone have a problem with? The USSC will soon wonder ..)
To: Jim 0216
It's “The Emperor Has No Clothes” story in regard to his chances. It's obvious to everyone he has no chance of winning except in the few square inches of his grey matter and to his most ardent, hateful supporters.
What's beautiful is the possible destruction of the Dem party. Do the Dems give up the presidency in ‘08 just to keep Hillary from running? They're screwed either way.
Their best best is to run Hillary. She could win against McCain: who is a hero but is so politically dumb he's lame.
It's healthy to realize the trauma that has been brought upon ourselves. As Rush said on Friday, Hillary used to be the worst it got and now people are feeling sorry for her.
31
posted on
05/18/2008 11:01:43 AM PDT
by
Vision
("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
To: Winged Hussar
The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, Obama, like many on the left, is deluded into thinking that once the "Palestinians" are given a state hatred in the Islamic world for both the U.S. and Israel will disspate. ...as will jihad movement. Of course nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, it'll just encourage that movement even more. Appeasement always does.
32
posted on
05/18/2008 11:02:17 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Polybius
Just want to reiterate that this wasn't a quote from me! -------------
WTF does that have to do with anything?
TRADITION!!!
33
posted on
05/18/2008 11:03:33 AM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
To: JLS
34
posted on
05/18/2008 11:03:52 AM PDT
by
Vision
("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
To: Polybius
You can call the Jewish voting for 'Rats "tradition" but the more appropriate word is addiction. That's because these Jewish Dummies are doing something despite the fact they know it's harmful, they can't stop, and they in fact enjoy it and brag about how "good" it feels with their similar-minded friends.
To: pillut48
After these comments, WHY would any self-respecting Jewish American even consider VOTING for this idiot?!? First of all, American Jewish liberals are far more liberal than they are Jewish. Liberalism is their religion, not Judaism. Secondly, you'll find no small number of Israeli liberals who agree with Obama's assertion/delusion that once the "Palestinians" are given a state everything's going to be just hunky dory.
36
posted on
05/18/2008 11:13:11 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: justiceseeker93
Re: " You can call the Jewish voting for 'Rats "tradition" but the more appropriate word is addiction. That's because these Jewish Dummies are doing something despite the fact they know it's harmful, they can't stop, and they in fact enjoy it and brag about how "good" it feels with their similar-minded friends. "
They would probably vote for Hitler if he was running with a "D" instead of an "N" after his name, and I am speaking as a Jewish voter. The National Jewish Democratic Council is one of the most disgusting organizations I have ever seen, and the Union for Reform Judaism comes across as MoveOn.org with Jewish holidays.
Of course, Barack Obama's church is pretty much the same thing, noting its ties with the Sabeel Ecuminical Liberation Theology Center. ("Where's Waldo Jesus?")
37
posted on
05/18/2008 11:13:40 AM PDT
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: Brilliant
Im surprised that the Dems think they can do that without bringing the wrath of their Jewish wing down on themThey know each other well enough. As Rush has pointed out, the secret is that liberal Jews are liberals first Jews second, just like feminazis are leftists first and women second. Same for liberal Blacks, homosexuals, etc. It all falls into place very elegantly if you apply the simple rule.
To: Bobkk47
The fundamental question is: "What is the reason for oppression, poverty, and hatred in the Moslem countries?"
BHO: "Israeli actions."
GWB: "their leaders"
39
posted on
05/18/2008 11:17:19 AM PDT
by
kenavi
("My mudder thanks you, my fodder thanks you, and Obama thanks you!")
To: Bobkk47
The fundamental question is: "What is the reason for oppression, poverty, and hatred in the Moslem countries?"
BHO: "Israeli actions."
GWB: "their leaders"
40
posted on
05/18/2008 11:17:26 AM PDT
by
kenavi
("My mudder thanks you, my fodder thanks you, and Obama thanks you!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson