Posted on 05/17/2008 4:33:13 AM PDT by The Wizard
what do you think/
“And as for McCain, I wanted Rudy...”
Uh-oh. You lost the crowd.
Rudy? Lol.
What’s he doing now? Bustin chops somewhere, hanging around his twinkle tinsel friends?
Many of us have been saying this for years.
Inasmuch as we have no representation in Washington,DC, it is good to see Rusbo call a spade a spade, and use his "bully pulpit" to help to cut the head off the snake.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
Rush is right and you can find that in the liberal hatred of him. They hate him because he is right and they just refuse to believe it and remain in their own perfect utopia shielded from reality. To me, liberals live a fantasy.
I mean Rudy? McCain?
Obama wrote his book and air brushed his whole life. It was to be his convicing argument. He is nothing but an orator...dressed in an empty shell. He is a nobody.
As for wanting Rudy, that's fine, it's your choice. Each candidate offered some fairly strong benefits, even if they were offset in other's eyes one way or another. I mean, look what we ended up with...Rudy would have made a filet out of Obambi.
I wanted Fred. *sigh* Oh, to have a Fred Thompson from 20 years ago in the race.
I think it’s a pretty good rant. BTTT!
I was listening to one of BOs soundbites on Rush yesterday and in it he, BO, called Iran, Iraq. Rush didn’t catch it.
Marxists!
Democrats and environmentalists are Marxists and are dedicated to the complete overthrow of freedom everywhere. Sadly there are lots of useful idiots in the Republican party willing to help them.
It is time to call the the enemy what and who it is: Marxism and Marxist.
Is that because you're determined not to get bigger government, higher taxes and a weaker economy?
Three things drive me NUTZ about Rush:
1) I wish he would do more to educate his listeners that the underlying enemy is Marxism. It drives everything a so-called “liberal” says and does. He should use the words Marxist and communist to refer to these people. The words “liberal”, “socialist”, and “progressive” are merely smokescreens that these enemies of freedom hide behind.
2) He does not give the homosexual activists and their outrages enough time. They too are enemies of freedom.
3) While he takes pots shots at K-12 government schools, he does not tell his listeners to remove their kids from government schools. To my knowledge he has never identified our K-12 schools as being a major weapon of the Marxists against freedom. The Marxists own our government K-12 schools, and they are hard at work indoctrinating the next generation of voters.
I think we whom are the politically frustrated are being played like a Stradivarius.
I think there are 'powers that be' that can pull strings and levers and accomplish things just like Satan in the Garden .... we are not actually made to do anything, but are lured and enticed by our own desires (That dumb ol' idealistic America we thought we understood as we read founding documents and the lives of the framers .. etc. ).
We are being asked ... "Yea, hath the Constitution said ... ?", and being told we don't understand the English language.
What do I think?
A few brave souls will take matters into their own hands and try to accomplish something to save America ... but they will be painted as absolute crazies, and most will tsk tsk the effort, have another beer, and go to work Monday following church on Sunday.
That's what I think.
I can't vote for Juan because unlike Rudy, I think Juan has gone out of his way to give me the finger on every occasion.
Regardless, we're stuck with four years of this child dipstick screwing up the country. The good news is that because of his inexperience, he's LESS likely to appoint tough, party-oriented cabinet, judges, and staff, and therefore LESS likely than someone like Clinton to have a long-term impact on the country. (Provided we don't get nuked in the meantime).
Reagan didn't spend a lot of time bashing homosexuals either: the reason? There are only so many hours in a day and only so much educating you can do. Keep it simple.
The fact is, you aren't going to get far attacking public schools. Virtually everyone I know who has kids in public schools is happy. That's because a) they are "free" in that their fellow citizens are paying for the education, and b) if you exclude homeschoolers, the data is pretty consistent showing LITTLE difference between the performance of private schools and public schools. In fact, if you exclude inner-city schools, there is almost no difference at all. The real difference is home-schooled vs. public---but not all parents are capable or qualified to home-school.
I think Rush is pretty much right in focusing on a few things: taxes, the environment, and national defense. Rinse and repeat.
THE DEMOCRATS....
A NUT WITH BOOBS or
A BOOB WITH NUTS
I think Cindy is hot! Imagine, a first lady showing cleavage. /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.