This is not a new subject, for me or for FreeRepublic. However, as long as there are politicians, journalists, and even judges who do not understand what the job of a judge is, we will have to pound away at this subject.
John / Billybob
To: Congressman Billybob
Good one, CB. Keep working for the sake of conservatism and a return to the principles of the U.S. Constitution.
2 posted on
05/16/2008 9:31:44 AM PDT by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: Congressman Billybob
All Hail King Court! Just let the judges rule.
3 posted on
05/16/2008 9:34:16 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Congressman Billybob
Ahh, but the good news is that California’s judges, even those on the Supreme Court, do face re-election races, as Rose Bird learned so well. Perhaps another recall drive is in order.
4 posted on
05/16/2008 9:35:03 AM PDT by
DryFly
To: Congressman Billybob
I'm guessing you're already familiar with the works, but Mark Levin's "Men In Black," and Robert Bork's "Slouching Towards Gomorrah," provide ample documentation of the systematic abuses of the American judiciary and how it has exceeded it's Constitutional mandate to assume a role in the shaping of the culture.
Highly recommended reading for those that haven't yet picked them up.
5 posted on
05/16/2008 9:37:06 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Congressman Billybob
Excellent post, John. Thanks to the sophist bilge our government schools have peddled to students for several generations, these basic facts sadly need re-stating. Our country has really lost its way.
To: Congressman Billybob
This is just the natural progression of other court ordered "solutions" to "problems." Take the bussing examples...
We'll written piece, John.
7 posted on
05/16/2008 9:37:51 AM PDT by
Fundamentally Fair
(Well, he's not Obama. McCain '08!)
To: Congressman Billybob
In California, such a petition will go on its ballot this fall, to write the subject into the California Constitution and put it beyond the reach of its Supreme Court.What do they need to do to succeed there?
Can we help?
14 posted on
05/16/2008 2:22:08 PM PDT by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: Congressman Billybob
Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!
15 posted on
05/17/2008 1:04:04 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
To: Congressman Billybob
the subject really is so simple that a young child can understand it. It only becomes complicated when sophists get a hold of it, whether they are lawyers who disrespect the Constitution and the will of the people, or worse, lawyers in black robes who sit on the bench and disrespect the Constitution and the people.
sophist 1542, earlier sophister (c.1380), from L. sophista, sophistes, from Gk. sophistes, from sophizesthai "to become wise or learned," from sophos "wise, clever," of unknown origin. Gk. sophistes came to mean "one who gives intellectual instruction for pay," and, contrasted with "philosopher," it became a term of contempt. Ancient sophists were famous for their clever, specious arguments.
philosopher O.E. philosophe, from L. philosophus, from Gk. philosophos "philosopher," lit. "lover of wisdom," from philos "loving" + sophos "wise, a sage." "Pythagoras was the first who called himself philosophos, instead of sophos, 'wise man,' since this latter term was suggestive of immodesty." [Klein]
Modern form with -r appears c.1325, from an Anglo-Fr. or O.Fr. variant of philosophe, with an agent-noun ending. . . .
To: Congressman Billybob
Was the California Supreme Court wrong in 1948 when it struck down the law banning interracial marriage?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson