Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This atheist finds he needs a foxhole
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 4, 2008 | Robyn E. Blumner

Posted on 05/16/2008 7:55:57 AM PDT by rosenfan

Maybe the reason the misperception persists that there are no atheists in foxholes is that nonbelievers must either shut up about their views or be hounded out of the military.

Just ask Army Spc. Jeremy Hall, who is making a splash in the news because of the way his atheism was attacked by superiors and fellow soldiers while he was risking his life in service to his country.

Hall, 23, served two combat tours in Iraq, winning the Combat Action Badge. But he's now stationed at Fort Riley, Kan., having been returned stateside early because the Army couldn't ensure his safety.

There is something deeply amiss when we send soldiers on a mission to engender peaceful coexistence between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, yet our military doesn't seem able to offer religious tolerance to its own.

Hall recounts the events that led to his marginalization in a federal lawsuit he filed in March in Kansas. Hall is joined by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, a group devoted to assisting members of the military who object to the pervasive and coercive Christian proselytizing in our armed forces.

Hall's atheism became an issue soon after it became known. On Thanksgiving 2006 while stationed outside Tikrit, Hall politely declined to join in a Christian prayer before the holiday meal. The result was a dressing down by a staff sergeant who told him that as an atheist he needed to sit somewhere else.

In another episode, after his gun turret took a bullet that almost found an opening, the first thing a superior wanted to know was whether Hall believed in Jesus now, not whether he was okay.

Then, in July, while still in Iraq, Hall organized a meeting of the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers. According to Hall, after things began, Maj. Freddy Welborn disrupted the meeting with threats saying he might bring charges against Hall for conduct detrimental to good order and discipline, and that Hall was disgracing the Constitution. (Err, I think the major has that backward.) Welborn has denied the allegations, but the New York Times reports that another soldier at the meeting said that Hall's account was accurate.

Hall claims that he was denied a promotion in part because he wouldn't be able to "pray with his troops." And of course he was returned from overseas due to physical threats from fellow soldiers and superiors. Things became so bad that he was assigned a full-time bodyguard.

This is nothing new to Mikey Weinstein, founder of MRFF and a former Air Force judge advocate general who also served in the Reagan administration. Weinstein says that he has collected nearly 8,000 complaints, mostly from Christian members of the military tired of being force-fed a narrow brand of evangelical fundamentalism.

Weinstein, who co-wrote the book With God on Our Side: One Man's War Against an Evangelical Coup in America's Military, has documented how the ranks of our military have been infiltrated by members of the Officers' Christian Fellowship and other similar organizations. On its Web site, the OCF makes no secret of its mission which is to "raise up a godly military" by enlisting "ambassadors for Christ in uniform."

Weinstein says recruitment is easy in a strict command-subordinate military where the implied message is, if you don't pray the right way, your career might stall.

Beyond the mincemeat being made of church-state separation and religious liberty, it seems particularly combustible for our armed forces to be combining "end-times" Christian theology with military might. That's no way to placate Muslim populations around the world.

But there's no will for change. The military's virulent religious intolerance could be eradicated tomorrow with swift sanctions against transgressors. Instead, it's winked at and those caught proselytizing suffer no consequence. It appears that brave men like Hall, who simply wish to follow the dictates of their own conscience, will be needing bodyguards for a long time to come.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atheism; fiction; madeupstory; persecution; tolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: DeLaine

Correct. The Chaplain was one of the most non-busy people on-bord.


41 posted on 05/16/2008 8:49:49 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
This doesn't pass the sniff test

Agreed. Me thinks someone is trying to push an agenda here.
42 posted on 05/16/2008 8:50:31 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Average White Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
How, by having the guy get killed?

Hardly. How about, less dramatically, producing documents verifying that the Army moved him for his own safety?

43 posted on 05/16/2008 8:50:46 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
Kind of like taking this article at face-value.

So you have some information to the contrary. Please share.

44 posted on 05/16/2008 8:50:48 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Yes


45 posted on 05/16/2008 8:52:24 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Because it would be American and intelligent to just go ahead and reprimand someone who has been accused of misbehavior - without any proof other than the say-so of a disgruntled subordinate and that subordinate's friend?

If it's true of course. If he lied about the incident, court martial him.

I guess you'd just rather ignore it. Religious discrimination in the military; no big deal huh?

46 posted on 05/16/2008 8:53:17 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: contemplator
The author seems to delight in attributing the actions of a few people to the entire Army

Skewed news is nothing new. But even if all 8,000 complaints are true, that's less than half a percent of our military members. And given that these complaints were over time we're probably talking about a quarter percent with turnover. That is a pretty low rate of harrassment for an organization like our military, with stresses and vastly differing backgrounds of the personnel.

47 posted on 05/16/2008 8:57:13 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
This is un-American and stupid.

The staff sergeant and the superior should be reprimanded. There is no religious test for military service.


Agreed. The purpose of the US military is clear and well-defined, and meddling in religious matters is no part of that purpose.
48 posted on 05/16/2008 8:59:47 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Religious discrimination is in the eye of the beholder. The United States government has no authority under the Constitution to determine what is or is not religious in nature.

The government can only take action on the basis of strictly secular standards.

Constant verbal harrassment could be an action the military might be concerned about.

The government could not subject the statement "You're gonna' go to hell for that" to any sort of critical analysis that delved into the existence, or non-existence of Hell, or what goes on in Hell ~ for instance to determine if it was a "threat", a "promise", a "curse", or whatever.

What you find in this story is an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill.

49 posted on 05/16/2008 9:00:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You had an overactive imagination.

Nope. It was common knowledge. Jews and other Christian denominations knew to not rock the boat too.

but it’s not some sort of conspiracy aimed at you

Who's talking conspiracy?

50 posted on 05/16/2008 9:01:39 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Actually he has a good heart. It not his fault he was raised by hippies. At least he is patriotic. More than I can say for some creepy, souless eyed types.


51 posted on 05/16/2008 9:01:53 AM PDT by LottieDah (Democrats and liberals never fail to disappoint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
If it's true of course. If he lied about the incident, court martial him.

There was no conditional in your post - simply an outright call for punishment.

I guess you'd just rather ignore it. Religious discrimination in the military; no big deal huh?

I posted nothing of the kind.

But before we start condemning our military, perhaps we should first check to see if this individual's accusations are substantiated by anything more than his pique.

It's amazing that some on FR, of all places, have not learned the lesson of Scott Thomas Beauchamp.

52 posted on 05/16/2008 9:03:50 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rosenfan
Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers.

The clear anti religious bigotry of a name like that blows this guys credibility completely out of the water. No sympathy.
53 posted on 05/16/2008 9:06:27 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
B.S., rarely do you find any Jew who has the slightest idea of what Christian motivation is all about.

Those who do have lived out among the Gentiles for many years and have figured them out.

Again, overactive imagination seeing conspiracies among the Holy Rollers ~ get over it already.

That's not how it works.

54 posted on 05/16/2008 9:06:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah

Did he get harrassed because of his atheism?


55 posted on 05/16/2008 9:07:17 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

No, he wasn’t harassed because of his atheism.


56 posted on 05/16/2008 9:10:25 AM PDT by LottieDah (Democrats and liberals never fail to disappoint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
How, by having the guy get killed?

It should be easy enough to substantiate the incidents that caused them to believe his life was in danger.

That is, IF any such incidents occurred.

57 posted on 05/16/2008 9:10:45 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

No different than accusing Marines of murder on the say so of an disgruntled Iraqi rugrider.


58 posted on 05/16/2008 9:11:16 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Those who do have lived out among the Gentiles for many years and have figured them out.

Thus not rocking the boat. Figuring them out is fine in civilian life, but not quite so easy in the military.

Again, overactive imagination seeing conspiracies

What's this thing you have for conspiracies?

59 posted on 05/16/2008 9:12:02 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
There was no conditional in your post - simply an outright call for punishment.

I thought it obvious that punishment is only warranted if after investigating their veracity. I'll preface for you next time.

60 posted on 05/16/2008 9:12:46 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson