Skip to comments.
This atheist finds he needs a foxhole
St. Petersburg Times ^
| May 4, 2008
| Robyn E. Blumner
Posted on 05/16/2008 7:55:57 AM PDT by rosenfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: DeLaine
Correct. The Chaplain was one of the most non-busy people on-bord.
41
posted on
05/16/2008 8:49:49 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: Dead Dog
This doesn't pass the sniff test
Agreed. Me thinks someone is trying to push an agenda here.
42
posted on
05/16/2008 8:50:31 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Average White Conservative)
To: stuartcr
How, by having the guy get killed?Hardly. How about, less dramatically, producing documents verifying that the Army moved him for his own safety?
43
posted on
05/16/2008 8:50:46 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: L98Fiero
Kind of like taking this article at face-value.So you have some information to the contrary. Please share.
To: antiRepublicrat
45
posted on
05/16/2008 8:52:24 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: wideawake
Because it would be American and intelligent to just go ahead and reprimand someone who has been accused of misbehavior - without any proof other than the say-so of a disgruntled subordinate and that subordinate's friend? If it's true of course. If he lied about the incident, court martial him.
I guess you'd just rather ignore it. Religious discrimination in the military; no big deal huh?
To: contemplator
The author seems to delight in attributing the actions of a few people to the entire Army Skewed news is nothing new. But even if all 8,000 complaints are true, that's less than half a percent of our military members. And given that these complaints were over time we're probably talking about a quarter percent with turnover. That is a pretty low rate of harrassment for an organization like our military, with stresses and vastly differing backgrounds of the personnel.
To: GunRunner
This is un-American and stupid.
The staff sergeant and the superior should be reprimanded. There is no religious test for military service.
Agreed. The purpose of the US military is clear and well-defined, and meddling in religious matters is no part of that purpose.
To: GunRunner
Religious discrimination is in the eye of the beholder. The United States government has no authority under the Constitution to determine what is or is not religious in nature.
The government can only take action on the basis of strictly secular standards.
Constant verbal harrassment could be an action the military might be concerned about.
The government could not subject the statement "You're gonna' go to hell for that" to any sort of critical analysis that delved into the existence, or non-existence of Hell, or what goes on in Hell ~ for instance to determine if it was a "threat", a "promise", a "curse", or whatever.
What you find in this story is an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill.
49
posted on
05/16/2008 9:00:50 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
You had an overactive imagination. Nope. It was common knowledge. Jews and other Christian denominations knew to not rock the boat too.
but its not some sort of conspiracy aimed at you
Who's talking conspiracy?
To: stuartcr
Actually he has a good heart. It not his fault he was raised by hippies. At least he is patriotic. More than I can say for some creepy, souless eyed types.
51
posted on
05/16/2008 9:01:53 AM PDT
by
LottieDah
(Democrats and liberals never fail to disappoint.)
To: GunRunner
If it's true of course. If he lied about the incident, court martial him.There was no conditional in your post - simply an outright call for punishment.
I guess you'd just rather ignore it. Religious discrimination in the military; no big deal huh?
I posted nothing of the kind.
But before we start condemning our military, perhaps we should first check to see if this individual's accusations are substantiated by anything more than his pique.
It's amazing that some on FR, of all places, have not learned the lesson of Scott Thomas Beauchamp.
52
posted on
05/16/2008 9:03:50 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: rosenfan
Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers.
The clear anti religious bigotry of a name like that blows this guys credibility completely out of the water. No sympathy.
53
posted on
05/16/2008 9:06:27 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: antiRepublicrat
B.S., rarely do you find any Jew who has the slightest idea of what Christian motivation is all about.
Those who do have lived out among the Gentiles for many years and have figured them out.
Again, overactive imagination seeing conspiracies among the Holy Rollers ~ get over it already.
That's not how it works.
54
posted on
05/16/2008 9:06:39 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: LottieDah
Did he get harrassed because of his atheism?
55
posted on
05/16/2008 9:07:17 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: MEGoody
No, he wasn’t harassed because of his atheism.
56
posted on
05/16/2008 9:10:25 AM PDT
by
LottieDah
(Democrats and liberals never fail to disappoint.)
To: stuartcr
How, by having the guy get killed?It should be easy enough to substantiate the incidents that caused them to believe his life was in danger.
That is, IF any such incidents occurred.
57
posted on
05/16/2008 9:10:45 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: wideawake
No different than accusing Marines of murder on the say so of an disgruntled Iraqi rugrider.
58
posted on
05/16/2008 9:11:16 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
To: muawiyah
Those who do have lived out among the Gentiles for many years and have figured them out. Thus not rocking the boat. Figuring them out is fine in civilian life, but not quite so easy in the military.
Again, overactive imagination seeing conspiracies
What's this thing you have for conspiracies?
To: wideawake
There was no conditional in your post - simply an outright call for punishment.I thought it obvious that punishment is only warranted if after investigating their veracity. I'll preface for you next time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson