Skip to comments.
Obama as Chamberlain (Neville, not Wilt) - Photoshop
ExurbanLeague.com ^
| May 15, 2008
| Exurban Jon
Posted on 05/15/2008 12:58:33 PM PDT by inkling
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
05/15/2008 12:58:33 PM PDT
by
inkling
To: inkling
Chamberlain never used articulate words like “uhh” and “y’know”.
2
posted on
05/15/2008 1:00:49 PM PDT
by
weegee
(Vote NO on Marxism in 2008.)
To: inkling
Some know how to fight. Some do not.
3
posted on
05/15/2008 1:02:51 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: inkling
As Dana put it, This isn’t all about you!
Suck it up, Barry. You’re such a target rich environment. You won’t survive if you keep this up.
Wile E Coyote Democrats at it again!
4
posted on
05/15/2008 1:02:51 PM PDT
by
griswold3
(Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
To: weegee
Yeah, but Chamberlain never made Chrissy Matthews legs tingle.
5
posted on
05/15/2008 1:03:40 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: weegee
Chamberlain never used articulate words like uhh and yknow.
Bammy said "you guys" yesterday!! Very presidential.
6
posted on
05/15/2008 1:06:06 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: inkling
7
posted on
05/15/2008 1:07:49 PM PDT
by
pipecorp
( Al Lahsucks (boat steersman ) hell)
To: inkling
Again, Bush’s hypocrisy is showing:
If it’s wrong to talk with terrorist states, why is his administration talking with North Korea?
Is it because Bush believes “some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along”?
To: inkling
Precisely.
Hopefully, the GOP will respond with two questions for Obama:
Which part of the speech does he think applied to him?
Which part does he disagree with?
9
posted on
05/15/2008 1:11:48 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: inkling
Neville Chamberlain got Hitler figured out less than one year after Munich when he declared war for the invasion of Poland. He also had the grace and dignity to step aside for Winston Churchill and shut up.
10
posted on
05/15/2008 1:14:50 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
To: inkling
You have to remember that Obama is a member of the Liberal Party and Chamberlain was a member of the Conservative Party.
And John McCain is a member of the ______________ Party.
11
posted on
05/15/2008 1:17:59 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: inkling
off topic, but...
12
posted on
05/15/2008 1:22:18 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
To: steel_resolve
Oh, that’s a great one! HA!
13
posted on
05/15/2008 1:24:29 PM PDT
by
inkling
(exurbanleague.com)
To: inkling
To: inkling; NormsRevenge; elhombrelibre; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; G8 Diplomat; Dog; Cap Huff; ...
To: pipecorp; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Excellent!
16
posted on
05/15/2008 2:35:06 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Hussein Obama"Hama's" Pastor, Jeremiah Wright: "God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11")
To: inkling
Ten Questions to Ask the Dems About Appeasement I wrote Blitzer a note after he had Kerry on to rip W. Wolf, 1) I appreciate you throwing McCains quotes at Kerry in an effort to be fair and balanced but if all the hubbub is about the questions posed in Bushs speech, how about at least asking the indignant Dems to answer the actual questions that spurred them to launch their coordinated attack in defense of appeasement? 2) Is it foolish delusion to claim that talking with terrorists will result in peace? 3) Should we negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along? 4) Arent you saying like that Senator back in 1939 that Lord, if only I could talk to Ahmadinejad, all of this might be avoided? 5) Isnt this really the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history? 6) Arent you defending the failed strategy of appeasement and thinking that if you go and talk with Ahmadinejad that theyll forget their evil ways and learn to love us? 7) What makes you think they would treat a future president any better than they did Jimmy Carter? 8) When one looks at how they use the spectacle of a U.N. address to excoriate us, wouldnt they similarly use the spectacle of talks as a sign of legitimacy and an opportunity to offer no peaceful conciliation but rather a tool to justify the path theyve chosen? 9) If you speak with Iran, what demands would you make of them and what are you willing to compromise to get a deal? 10) To which kinds of terrorists would you talk and to which would you not?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I love it when paranoid libs assume everything is always about them:)
18
posted on
05/15/2008 3:21:50 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
To: Ann Archy
Obama gives very Presidential introductions to John Edwards yesterday.....
Lets give it up for Senator John Edwards
Future White House Intros...
Lets give it up for Secretary of State...
Lets give it up for Prime Minister....
others?
Ring Announcer: State of the Union...
"Now! President of the United States, your Commander and Chief and everyone's favorite appeaserrrrr...BaaaRock Oooobammaaaaa!!!!"
19
posted on
05/15/2008 3:28:30 PM PDT
by
topfile
To: topfile
“Let’s get ready to RAAAAAAAAAAAP”!!!!
20
posted on
05/15/2008 4:07:53 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson