Link to story: http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080511/NEWS0502/805110404/1310/ARCHIVE
What kind of journalism is this? Simply makes accusation without providing any background?
They are saying that "crossover voters" in Indiana committed a crime and gave the victory to Clinton (although nobody can prove it).
That means Hillary won the Indiana primary by "fraudulent" means. However, she is happy to have the victory regardless of how it was obtained.
Obama, but for the Operation Chaos voters, would have won the Indiana primary.
So, who is the real winner in Indiana: Clinton, who won the state by "fradulent" means, or Obama, who would have won, had it not been for Operation Chaos?
From my standpoint, voting in the dem primary and choosing the candidate (of the dems) that you would prefer in case our own liberal (McCain) looses is a reasonable thing to do...
Where’s the beef?
barack mcgovern and opie? Now THAT is my dream team! With that lineup they could actually break the magic 20% mark for White male voters. They could actually get less than 1 in 5 WMVs. That would be a big help.
But offering college students free Dave Matthew concert tickets in exchange for an early vote for Obama is fine.