They are saying that "crossover voters" in Indiana committed a crime and gave the victory to Clinton (although nobody can prove it).
That means Hillary won the Indiana primary by "fraudulent" means. However, she is happy to have the victory regardless of how it was obtained.
Obama, but for the Operation Chaos voters, would have won the Indiana primary.
So, who is the real winner in Indiana: Clinton, who won the state by "fradulent" means, or Obama, who would have won, had it not been for Operation Chaos?
What I found interesting about Indiana’s primary was how Hillary was predicted to win by a large margin but did not, due to thousands of absentee ballots suddenly popping up in the Democrat-dominated, primarily black-populated, city of Gary.
Anybody from Indiana care to offer an opinion concerning the possibility of fraud in that county?