Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Hopes to Crash McCain's Party
ABC News ^ | 5/13/08 | Marcus Barum

Posted on 05/14/2008 8:51:18 PM PDT by advance_copy

Sen. John McCain, taking a victory lap as the presumptive Republican nominee, happily poked fun at his only remaining opponent.

Asked during an appearance on "The Daily Show" last week which of the two Democratic nominees he preferred to run against in the general election, McCain quipped, "Ron Paul."

But Paul might get the last laugh during McCain's coronation at the party's convention in early September.

McCain's nomination may be certain, but he finds himself pressured by different wings of the conservative movement -- from the libertarians and the anti-war activists, to social conservatives and evangelical voters.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008rncconvention; mccain; mnehrlinghateronpaul; mnehrlinghatespaul; paulestinians; ronpaul; rontards; scampi; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-367 next last
To: advance_copy

McCain will fight Islamo Fascism. There you go, the case is made.


41 posted on 05/14/2008 9:18:53 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: svcw
"2. he wont, he didn’t vote for GWB tax cuts"

**sigh**

Because the tax cuts did NOT come with provisions to REDUCE spending!


42 posted on 05/14/2008 9:19:27 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jpf

and I own 2 bridges...Wanna trade????....DA!

that would be...Dbmu sas to u..


43 posted on 05/14/2008 9:19:51 PM PDT by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Do you want a President that was endorsed by Hamas?


44 posted on 05/14/2008 9:20:03 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I saw him on the Fox News Network, amusing fellow - reminds me of a Bernie Sanders of the Isolationist Right. Worked up, crusty pale faces who need to smoke a hookah full of pot to mellow out./Just Asking - seoul62......


45 posted on 05/14/2008 9:20:09 PM PDT by seoul62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Yes, McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts as they were then written on that bill. But, did you pay any attention to his reason for voting against those tax cuts? He voted not against the cuts themselves, but he voted against the bill because there were no provisions for cutting spending. I happen to agree that if we are going to have these tax cuts, we also must cut spending, especially the pork. Do you have a problem with this concept?


46 posted on 05/14/2008 9:20:38 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jpf
Whatever, Reagan would be backing McCain not Paul

I highly doubt that. I'm not even sure he would be a Republican, and you can quote me on that.

47 posted on 05/14/2008 9:20:38 PM PDT by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Duncan Hunter:’)


48 posted on 05/14/2008 9:21:42 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Reagan would be considered a huge RINO by today’s standards.

• As Governor Reagan signed into law the nations first No Fault Divorce Laws. Thes laws swept the nation and contributed in the break up of the American Family. "No-fault" divorce was pioneered in the United States by the state of California when Governor Ronald Reagan signed into law the Family Law Act of 1970 on September 4, 1969

• As Governor he also signed into law the right for women to have abortions. 1967 The Therapeutic Abortion Act

• 1986 As President he signed the only amnesty ever granted to illegals.

• As President he made the Federal Government twenty per cent larger .In 1981, the federal government spent $678 billion; in 1989 it spent $1.144 trillion.

• In 1982 alone, he signed into law not one but two major tax increases. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) raised taxes by $37.5 billion per year and the Highway Revenue Act raised the gasoline tax by another $3.3 billion. In 1983, Reagan signed legislation raising the Social Security tax rate.

• 1985 raised taxes yet again. Even the Tax Reform Act of 1986

• 1988 appears to be the only year of the Reagan presidency, other than the first, in which taxes were not raised.

49 posted on 05/14/2008 9:22:10 PM PDT by NoLibZone (The Huge Demonstrations by Illegals in 2006 prove they have more of the Spirit of 76 then we do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pupdog

Who would want to quote something so silly.


50 posted on 05/14/2008 9:22:39 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I just posted a comment to this person regarding this (a later post than yours). I think yours may have gotten his/her attention better with the larger print and the bold style. I’m tired of hearing these people crying about McCain voting against the tax cut when that is not the truth.


51 posted on 05/14/2008 9:22:40 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Think about the troops. Do you want their Commander-in-Chief to be Obama?

Reference the part where I said to focus on McCain, not his opponents. I know of Obama and Clinton and never had any plans to vote for either, even in my most vicious punish-the-GOP moments.

Please, I'm not looking for a quick soundbite answer. I'm hardcore Paul, but I'm also always open to reason. Show me what is good about McCain himself. Take your time and if you make a serious effort to prove your case, I'll listen with as open a mind as I can.

52 posted on 05/14/2008 9:23:30 PM PDT by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pupdog

I agree with you I believe he would nowadays be saying,
“I didn’t leave the Republican party, the Republican Party left me!”


53 posted on 05/14/2008 9:23:30 PM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Probably should have used larger print too!!! :0)


54 posted on 05/14/2008 9:23:47 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Show me a bill introduced by or an action by JM that would indicate he wants to reduce spending?
Was it MCain/Feingold?
Was it McCain/Kennedy?
Was it McCain/Lieberman?
Was it the global warming hoax?
Where has he been vocal on reducing spending?
55 posted on 05/14/2008 9:23:47 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Thank you Dubya. I like paying lower taxes." I too am fond of keeping more of my paycheck. I keep $4k more per year of my paycheck.

Then I guess ya won't mind when the build his presidential library with illegal labor.

56 posted on 05/14/2008 9:23:51 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua
“I didn’t leave the Republican party, the Republican Party left me!”

Super Jackpot.

57 posted on 05/14/2008 9:24:42 PM PDT by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher

U said it for me!...Ill be a dumb ass too i guess


58 posted on 05/14/2008 9:25:31 PM PDT by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Despite my severe disappointment with W, I'd vote for him again. He has been great on judges, adequate on the war and good on taxes. He has been lousy on PR, and he has given in to the libs for his last 2 years, but his first 6 were ok.

He has been a good caretaker, which is not as good as being an historic figure, but not as bad as being a disaster, like Carter. He has advanced conservatism in some ways during his Presidency, which means we are better off now than we would have been without him.

McCain, on the other hand.....I'm not sure conservatism would advance with him. His best selling point is that liberalism would, we think, not advance as swiftly with McCain as with Obama. But it would advance, from global warming, to illegal aliens, to restrictions on speech, to caving on everything that liberals want. Great, he is stronger on the war. So he would keep us safe in our liberal lair.

59 posted on 05/14/2008 9:25:31 PM PDT by Defiant (McCain's big vein drains mainly from his brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
McCain's nomination may be certain, but he finds himself pressured by different wings of the conservative movement -- from the libertarians and the anti-war activists, to social conservatives and evangelical voters.

Which is infinitely better than being pressured by "different wings" such as transsexuals, NAMBLA, the ACLU, PETA, unrepentant terrorists, Hamas, the NY Times, CAIR, liberation theologists, and Barbara Streisand.

60 posted on 05/14/2008 9:26:36 PM PDT by zipper ( Suicide voting is the quickest way to send the whole country to Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson