Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: NormsRevenge
It’s the dumb ones that are always the evidence in favor of “hold my hand” laws.
To: NormsRevenge
Didn’t we hear a similar story to this here in the states? A few months back?
4 posted on
05/13/2008 11:18:12 AM PDT by
Corin Stormhands
(What if Tony Almeida is the 12th Cylon?)
To: NormsRevenge
5 posted on
05/13/2008 11:18:42 AM PDT by
Borges
To: NormsRevenge
6 posted on
05/13/2008 11:19:06 AM PDT by
scottinoc
To: NormsRevenge
“Hold my beer. Watch this!”
8 posted on
05/13/2008 11:27:31 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't Blame Me, I voted for Kodos!)
To: NormsRevenge
Was it Foster’s?
Because Foster’s IS pretty darn good beer.
;^)
9 posted on
05/13/2008 11:28:24 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't Blame Me, I voted for Kodos!)
To: NormsRevenge
A man has got to have his priorities......
“Sorry Junior, it is a case of Guiness”
10 posted on
05/13/2008 11:29:43 AM PDT by
nevergore
("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
To: NormsRevenge
11 posted on
05/13/2008 11:30:29 AM PDT by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: NormsRevenge
The 30-can beer case was strapped in between two adults sitting in the back seat of the car. The child was also in back, but on the car's floor.Wait. A case has 30 cans in Australia?
I got no time to worry about some damn kid. I'm moving to Austalia!
To: NormsRevenge
“It’s all about the beer!”
18 posted on
05/13/2008 11:41:46 AM PDT by
AU72
To: NormsRevenge
How to speak Australian:
Children.
20 posted on
05/13/2008 11:44:56 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Go Stars!)
To: NormsRevenge
Darwin Award material should only endeavor to kill itself, never someone else. For instance, this guy has it right:
Three cheers for responsible Darwin Award contestants!
To: NormsRevenge
It can be tough growing up as a Foster’s-child.
To: Slings and Arrows
25 posted on
05/13/2008 11:53:05 AM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
To: NormsRevenge
Guy’s got his priorities straight I see. Kid was safe on the floor but the beer could have been shaken up excessively. (Sarcasm folks)
27 posted on
05/13/2008 12:13:09 PM PDT by
calex59
To: NormsRevenge
“This is the first time that the beer has taken priority over a child.”
I am not seeing it. How is the beer taking priority? Maybe the child wanted to play on the floor and they strapped the beer so it would not fall and hit the child. I apologize for bringing logic into the thread but this is a unfair attack on the parents.
Maybe they were wrong to not have the child belted (by today’s norms)but that is all. Trying to spin it as Beer>Child makes a “funny” story and all but it is not logical. Does beer like to sit on the seat? Does strapping the beer protect the beer?(How?) or the child sitting in front of it?
To: NormsRevenge; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
Now we know what happened to Lootie.
30 posted on
05/13/2008 10:35:24 PM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
("Code Pink should guard against creating stereotypes in the Mincing Community." --Titan Magroyne)
To: NormsRevenge
You can always have another child but beer you have to pay for.
32 posted on
05/14/2008 7:45:07 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(Vote for McCain but trust in the Lord)
To: NormsRevenge
It’s a true wonder that anyone ever lived before mandatory seat belt laws.
36 posted on
05/14/2008 12:20:46 PM PDT by
alarm rider
(Peace! through superior fire power....)
To: NormsRevenge
Whats the problem here?
Safety first!
38 posted on
05/14/2008 5:17:52 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
