Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Isn't Larry Sinclair on MSM, and can we help?
today | self

Posted on 05/13/2008 7:49:15 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues

Larry Sinclair. Larry Sinclair. Larry Sinclair. There, if we say it three times maybe the MSM will promote and investigate his claims. If there is one bit of truth in Sinclair's claims then they are a major national story. Why isn't it? Is he lying or telling the truth? And what can be done about getting the story to the overall public?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; larrysinclair; obama; sinclair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: BlueStateBlues
Because Larry Sinclair is a liar and has no credibility.

Is that enough of a reason?

21 posted on 05/13/2008 8:16:08 AM PDT by Paradox (Politics: The art of convincing the populace that your delusions are superior to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Valerie is a different story. She was a CIA officer, and the only question was how “secret” she was. Regardless of what she said, others could verify her claims.


22 posted on 05/13/2008 8:18:33 AM PDT by old-and-old
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; mimaw; BlueStateBlues; freekitty; oswegodeee; gonzo; SouthTexas; Piquaboy
Please list the ways that Obama can be beat.

_____________________________________________

The Wright and Weather Underground issues are fragile. They rely on tarring Obama with their sins.

Exposing in detail Obama's own, recent, public actions in Kenya (as a US Senator) are the way to go but not even our own Mark Levin is talking about it.

23 posted on 05/13/2008 8:19:22 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

OK, I think my question is answered. Even if his story is true, publicizing Sinclair would make the person who breaks the story in MSM look bad, and that’s enough reason for every, cough, “respected journalist” to shy away from it.

As I said, if true, how could this nervous druggie pass a polygraph? He can’t. So the story is also a nonstarter. Like Larry himself.


24 posted on 05/13/2008 8:20:03 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: C210N; kempo

No, we do not know the results of the test. The internet porn king who paid for the test is a big dem supporter. He owns the test results and simply issued a statement that there is no there there. I don’t believe him.


25 posted on 05/13/2008 8:21:37 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender No Retreat; BlueStateBlues; freekitty; SouthTexas; gonzo

Your analysis is “right on.” What a pathetic and demoralizing sad reality. Millions of patriotic Americans are turning in their graves at these gutless wonders who are willing to let our enemies, both foreign and domestic, destroy this great nation.


26 posted on 05/13/2008 8:23:01 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Because he failed a polygraph test.

__________________________________

Did you see the results or did you just believe the porn king/dem supporter who 'owns' the results?

27 posted on 05/13/2008 8:23:49 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues
If there is one bit of truth in Sinclair's claims then they are a major national story.

If there is one bit of truth to the claims of some street-grate-dwelling bum that the CIA put a chip in his brain on orders from the Pope, that too would be a major national story.

The two are about equally likely to be covered by any serious media institution.

28 posted on 05/13/2008 8:24:04 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

Go, Larry, GO!!
What needs to happen is other gay lovers and/or cocaine buddies of Obama need to stand up and testify about their seedy affairs. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are at least a couple waiting for good timing.


29 posted on 05/13/2008 8:24:29 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mimaw
Obama can be beat in other ways than this kind of crap.

Agreed.

Bizarre, unfounded allegations from uncredible sources are the province of the other guys. We won't stoop so low in a desperate grasp for power.

30 posted on 05/13/2008 8:25:00 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Yuck! Thanks for the link though.


31 posted on 05/13/2008 8:25:36 AM PDT by KarinG1 (Opinions expressed in this post are my own and do not necessarily represent those of sane people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Thank you and please keep adding to that list and keep it coming. It’s good for my BP.


32 posted on 05/13/2008 8:26:19 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kempo; pissant
He failed the test and that should have been the end of it.

Except that the test was apparently rigged.

33 posted on 05/13/2008 8:26:34 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

Look for the Obama defenders to rush out and insist he is above this activity. LOL


34 posted on 05/13/2008 8:28:49 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

Except he has three legal documents in the US Justice system making the claims agianst Obama. Why is he not being countersued or investigated for libel?


35 posted on 05/13/2008 8:31:03 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Whitehouse.com said Larry is lying, so it is settled law. /s


36 posted on 05/13/2008 8:32:02 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Stay away from this story......it will make us look ridiculous.

The Larry Sincair story is percolating right where it belongs, for now, here in the cybersphere and in the pages of 'Globe'. Did you know that not only gay choirmaster Donald Young was recently murdered under strange circumstances, but so were at least two other gay members of Obama's church? Maybe this church had a "down low" club and somebody is tidying up.

37 posted on 05/13/2008 8:32:17 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

It doesn’t matter.

The ‘accepted fact’ is he failed the test. So your choice is to let it go or fight the perception that Sinclair failed the test, all the while being labelled as a racist or engaging in personal destruction.

Suppose you prove that Sinclair didn’t fail the test. What are you left with? Obama is gay? Now he’s a gay black liberal? Sounds like the sort of thing that will get him more votes from his base.


38 posted on 05/13/2008 8:32:24 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: highball

You talking about Gennifer Flowers?


39 posted on 05/13/2008 8:35:42 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kidd

It is the ‘accepted fact’ based solely on the porn-king’s word. There are freepers, including me, who predicted that the results would never be made public and that Sinclair was duped, jumping at the $100k fee offered for the rights...$100k is a small price to pay to bury the story.


40 posted on 05/13/2008 8:38:33 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson