Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Childish superstition: Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear
UK Guardian ^ | May 13 2008 | James Randerson

Posted on 05/12/2008 6:22:59 PM PDT by Aristotelian

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." So said Albert Einstein, and his famous aphorism has been the source of endless debate between believers and non-believers wanting to claim the greatest scientist of the 20th century as their own.

A little known letter written by him, however, may help to settle the argument - or at least provoke further controversy about his views.

Due to be auctioned this week in London after being in a private collection for more than 50 years, the document leaves no doubt that the theoretical physicist was no supporter of religious beliefs, which he regarded as "childish superstitions".

Einstein penned the letter on January 3 1954 to the philosopher Eric Gutkind who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt. The letter went on public sale a year later and has remained in private hands ever since.

In the letter, he states: "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."

Einstein, who was Jewish and who declined an offer to be the state of Israel's second president, also rejected the idea that the Jews are God's favoured people.

"For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: einstein; jews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: RFEngineer
“It is the height of arrogance for man, Einstein or whomever, to claim that he, or any man, could understand the cosmos and all that is contained therein, given the time and capacity to observe and theorize.”

The underlined are the operative points. Scientists are an arrogant lot. As we are shown even on FR.

And for some the incomprehensible is even moreso....

Yeah....right back atcha.

61 posted on 05/14/2008 5:43:44 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
I did enjoy that, thank you.
62 posted on 05/14/2008 9:31:51 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

“Scientists are an arrogant lot. As we are shown even on FR.”

You sir, are an anti-scientite.

Take it back or I will challenge you to slide-rule fencing - with slides FULLY extended.


63 posted on 05/14/2008 10:20:43 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

What a wonderful story, CutePuppy! Thank you for posting it. It’s marvelous food for thought; I’ll treasure it.


64 posted on 05/15/2008 4:16:58 PM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson