Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 05/12/2008 1:37:03 PM PDT by shrinkermd
Global Warming is quack science. The “changes” these yahoos want the US to make in industry will destroy our economy.
The atmospheric CO2 level was twenty times today's level during the Cambrian period, with no catastrophic consequences.
If global warming scientists knew 1/100th of what they say they know, they would be dangerous.
bttp
With all due respect, do you work for McCain's campaign or the RNC? This is the second such post promoting him in the last hour.
Concerning your suggestion that "climate change" is a real issue, McCain is showing himself to be full of hot air.
The whole Global Warming fraud is based upon one, overarching goal---wealth redistribution within the U.S., and from the U.S. to the Third World.
If Mcacin actually supports this nonsense, then he is no better than Hillary or Obama.
And so it goes. Don’t listen to the whole show but knows everything that was said.
Typical.
So how are crops growing on Greenland these days? I’m sure the Vikings are just waiting for it to warm up enough to move back.
The problem is that there is NO peer reviewed scientific evidence that holding the atmospheric carbon dioxide levels to any particular level will have any discernible effect on atmospheric warming.
The only thing the proponents of these types of proposals have is flawed computer models with largely fudged numbers.
We don’t even know if holding the carbon dioxide levels to a low level will have an adverse effect on the atmosphere. Anybody who says they know one way or the other is telling a lie.
The only thing we do know is that these proposals will have an extreme negative effect on the world economy in general, and the U.S. economy in particular.
A young man in a penguin suit followed him from campaign stop to campaign stop, bugging him about the subject. Finally, McQueeg sat down and listened to what the *penguin* boy had to say.
He's been a *believer* ever since. (heard this on Laura Ingram)
Are you out of your mind? THE IPCC is nothing more than a front for the enviro/wackos who want to destroy capitalism. James Hansen is a shill for the Branch Algorians who is increasingly being exposed as a fraud. The arctic ice cap returned to last years levels over the winter. Greenland is NOT melting. Antarctica is COOLING, and sea ice in Antarctica reached RECORD levels last year.
I saw McCain say the typical liberal/enviro line of ‘even if global warming is not real, it can’t hurt to cut CO2 emissions. Nothing could be further from the truth. The truth is we are strangling our energy generating capacity in the USA. No nukes, no new coal (if the SIERRA CLUB has their way), and worst of all , vast supplies of CLEAN natural gas off limits to exploration, along with oil. If the planet is COOLING, as increasing numbers of scientists believe, then our need for fossil fuels to keep us from freezing to death will increase exponentially. Without the capacity to provide more energy, war, famine, and death will foolow. Those could be the consequences if the Global warming Alarmists are wrong. Look at the situation with natural gas this year if you want proof of that. At the start of last winter, we had RECORD supplies of nat gas in storage. The winter was COLD and we drew down to below normal supplies. Our domestic production is DECREASING and LNG suppliers are selling to other countries at higher prices. Throw ina hurricane in the gulf of mexico this summer and a cold winter and the next President will be facing a freezing electorate and will have to ration nat gas. Get a clue!
The probelm is that the global warming crowd has closed off debate.
McCains statement indicates the debate is over.
No there isn't a problem. That's where you and Rush disagree. So why do you need to call it "pandering?" Can't people have an honest disagreement with liberal environmentalists and call it that, a disagreement? It's a common tactic among people on the left that you have chosen to side with - find all kinds of "motives" for idealogical disagreement.
There’s a fair amount of evidence that warming causes the CO2 level to increase - not the other way around.
Odds are good mankind could quit using fossil fuels completely, and atmospheric CO2 would continue to rise.
Atmospheric CO2 levels have been rising for the last dozen years, and there’s been no concurrent rise in temperature.
McCain’s a charlatan.
Get back to me when scientists can correctly and consistently predict next week’s weather. Then I’ll be willing to consider their predictions for next month. Meanwhile, their predictions for next year, next decade or next century mean NOTHING.
“If Mcacin actually supports this nonsense, then he is no better than Hillary or Obama.”
He does, and he isn’t.
We sit here playing “What’s tomorrows weather?” while Iran is steadily enriching uranium.
Unbelievable.
With all due respect, do you work for McCain’s campaign or the RNC? This is the second such post promoting him in the last hour.”
_____________________
Nice catch VR!
When Quack science can accurately predict weather tomorrow, I’ll be more inclined to believe their global warming spew.
If there is global warming (and there maybe, I don’t know). Man doesn’t have squat to do with it.
It is a hoax.
I don’t believe any of it. By the way, spelling counts here at FR and knowing the difference between “here” and “hear” is important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.