Posted on 05/12/2008 9:34:40 AM PDT by Zakeet
Researchers said Windows XP Service Pack 3 delivers a measurable performance boost when compared to Windows XP with Service Pack 2.
Windows XP runs some applications up to 10% faster with the latest service pack installed, a research firm has found.
"We were pleasantly surprised to discover that Windows XP Service Pack 3 (v.3244) delivers a measurable performance boost to this aging desktop OS," wrote staff at exo.performance.network, in a blog post.
The researchers found that a PC loaded with Microsoft's XP SP3 completed the OfficeBench test suite in less than 50 seconds. A similarly configured system running Windows XP with Service Pack 2 took more than 50 seconds to complete the test suite -- which measures how quickly a computer can perform common tasks in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and Excel.
"Since SP3 was supposed to be mostly a bug-fix/patch consolidation release ... the unexpected speed boost comes as a nice bonus," the researchers wrote.
They added that XP SP3's slick performance may lead some computer users to forego Windows Vista. Exo.performance.network found that, with the new service pack, XP is now two times faster than the newer Microsoft OS.
The tests were conducted late last year, on a pre-release build of XP SP3. So it's possible the final version is even faster.
It's not all four-star reviews for the service pack, however.
Within hours of its general release last week, Windows XP SP3 began drawing hundreds of complaints from users who claim the update is wreaking havoc on their PCs.
The problems with XP SP3, according to posters on Microsoft's Windows XP message board, range from spontaneous reboots to outright system crashes.
(Excerpt) Read more at informationweek.com ...
You mean it's only 90% the performance hog of the previous update, don't you?
With XP's fourth iteration they're finally getting some real performance profiling tools aimed at the weak points in the OS and have cut some time for their best code toads and plied 'em with nothing but Jolt, Mountain Dew Red and Starbuck's Deep Vibrant Blend, since stock options aren't nearly what they used to be.
HF
I upgraded and have no problems. I think I notice a slight improvement on performance.
Pathetic? He is the one who was more than happy to post negative articles on XP and PC’s in general he should be more than willing to come and post or reply on a positive article. Now that is pathetic, kind of like the cult of Mac.
http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/commentary/cultofmac/2002/12/56674
“The Mac and its fans constitute the equivalent of a religion,” Belk wrote in the video’s abstract. “This religion is based on an origin myth for Apple Computer, heroic and savior legends surrounding its co-founder and current CEO Steve Jobs, the devout faith of its follower congregation, their belief in the righteousness of the Macintosh, the existence of one or more Satanic opponents, Mac believers proselytizing and converting nonbelievers, and the hope among cult members that salvation can be achieved by transcending corporate capitalism.”
Actually, it affects most owners of AMD processor machines with an improperly loaded OEM Xp kit, most especially from HP, as it has Intel and AMD drivers loaded at the same time. To install the service pack at this moment takes some basic computer knowledge and effort, which most of the users you cite wouldn't expend at this time.
Likely these issues will be corrected before the pushed out roll out of sp3 is done next month.
Did it do the update all by itself?
The MS update site gives options for installing critical and optional updates.
As far as I’m aware, SP3 is still an optional update, and not an automatic update [not sure if that has changed as yet].
The problems were encountered by HP systems with AMD cores.
These are the sort of problems you can expect with hardware diversity, unlike in a completely-Apple built Mac. But yea, if you’re going to use a computer for merely checking email and browsing the internet, a Mac might serve you better.
Wha...? An OS upgrade that cuts performance in half? I wonder why there's not widespread business adoption of this wonder?
It is nice to see more and more companies offering XP instead of Vista on new hardware.
Finally Microsoft takes another tip from Apple: Make the software run faster, not slower. I await all the bugs getting worked out so I can upgrade the VM XP image on the Mac and the wife’s XP machine with this.
Perhaps Swordmaker is too busy ignoring the class action suit recently settled by Apple for sneaking substandard monitors into Macbooks.
Ditto.
YES. I was pleasantly surprised.
I will add it was a Toshiba, m55, about 4 years old. I had time to format and reinstall the OS, which i had wanted to do for a month or more as it was getting a bit clogged, finished and then went straight to MS Update. After doing its checks and validation it said "SP3". I hit the button.
What did tick me off was after it nailed SP3 and everything was fine and dandy, i took another trip to updates and it tossed me another 6 critical.
Oh well, its humming now, all three computers are doing fine with sp3.
Re: posting about Windows XP SP3.
Had I seen it, I would have posted it.
The one “negative” article I posted, I posted to alert people with AMD processors there might be a problem and to backup before updating.
How do I prevent my new DELL XPS from automatically downloading SP3 in June.
Re: Mac updates causing crashes.
In all fairness, the update to Leopard caused PowerPC Macs with the haxie APE installed to fail on reboot.
99% of these problems are likely the result of third party drivers that don't conform to the way Microsoft wants or expects you to write drivers.
Some of Microsoft's interfaces make it cumbersome to follow their driver model if you need to do something more complicated or simply different than what they expect for your hardware to do.
If you use legacy functions, or access structures that Microsoft says are supposed to be considered opaque, there is a decent chance that sooner or later things will break when Microsoft changes the things you aren't supposed to be using.
The best option would of course be to not use things Microsoft doesn't want you to use. In reality, sometimes your project requirements just don't allow you to follow Microsoft's model.
I still spend far less time dealing with problems caused by Microsoft changing code they weren't expecting me to use, than with Linux developers changing code I was supposed to use.
Things change. Things break. You fix them, and hopefully make your product better in the process.
Give Microsoft and third party developers a little time, and they will work out most all of the problems. If you can't afford to have such problems, wait until the service pack has been out for a while before installing it.
Ahhh...some things never change.
And they likely never will. Major changes almost always result in some unintended consequences.
I bought my first Mac in 1984, because I didn't want to learn c>. I liked a mouse driven, icon based system. It was easy to use, and made me efficient. I have bought lots of other Macs, since then. I currently use a 2003 iMac here at home. I am buying a MacBook for the road. I currently also have a G4 Powerbook..
I have been forced to use Windoze machines at work. A tech guy is essential DAILY, and I don't exaggerate. I last called Apple in 1987! I usede my first one in 20 minutes, after setting it up, which took 10 minutes, due to their excellent icons on the cabinet. It took the PC world a few years to catch up to that.
The Mac and its fans constitute a bunch of folk who don't need to know anything about a computer, to use their computers. I never turn mine off!
I trashed Mac OS before OS X as a piece of antiquated junk under a pretty exterior, trashed the development of the PPC as it lagged behind x86, praised the architecture of the G5 but trashed IBM's inability/unwillingness to develop it further and get the heat down, and definitely trashed Apple's love for lawsuits and restrictive licenses.
Yet here I am, loving Leopard on an iMac and convincing people to switch. The reason is simple and atheistic: it is by far the best computer I've ever used. And not just that, it was a pleasant experience through entering the Apple store, purchasing, unpacking, setting it up and using it. This is a company that pays attention to every little detail of the entire experience to the point of being obsessive-compulsive, and I appreciate it.
I know you’re right, I just like tweaking the Evil Empire.
If you're in need of a tech guy daily then there's a problem with the interface between the chair and the keyboard and I don't exaggerate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.