NYT Slime Quote:
The United States needs a clean break from eight catastrophic years of George W. Bush. And so far, Senator John McCain is shaping up as Bush the Sequel — neverending war in Iraq, tax cuts for the rich while the middle class struggles, courts packed with right-wing activists intent on undoing decades of progress in civil rights, civil liberties and other vital areas.
Hey, it's the New York Slimes. It's part of their demented malevolent culture to segway into an anti-Republican harangue whenever.
Freepers can continue to criticize Bush.......when I judge him by who his enemies are (The resources behind the New York Times), I quickly overlook his faults.
How can it be said that she has the means to remain in the race, when she is millions of dollars in the hole, and hasn't paid many of her venues?
Try to put yourself in Hillarys shoes. (yuck)
If you thought Obama would lose to McCain, but that you would win, if you somehow got the nomination, would you drop out?
/massive Sarc
THIS is what they are most concened about. Those SCOTUS appointments are their holy grail.
I forget - - has the New York Times reported anything about Obama's gay lover/cocaine buddy, Larry Sinclair, yet?
The only broad support Hillary has left is in her girdle.
Translation: “We are the Editorial Board of the Greatest Newspaper of All Time, so listen carefully to what we have to say, and then shut up and do it!”
New York can have her..Nobody else wants her!! They are entitled to & deserve what they get for electing her.
Too bad the people in New York don't understand what the words 'integrity' & 'influence' mean.
Isn't it amazing?
No, it's the New York Times, after all.
Barack Obama's "mentor of twenty years", his political base, his writings in his books and his recent statements wallow in race identity politics and the New York Times scolds Hillary Clinton for "disturbing racial undertones" for pointing out that such race identity politics has turned off voters who are sick and tired of the Race Card.
Typical liberal rant, they start out saying "she has the right" and segue to the BUT.
Once again, the NYT fails to accurately describe historical proclamations for 40 acres and mule. Every time the Old Gray Lady spews hypocritical nonsense, I feel all warm and fuzzy.
Dinosaur media death watch...
What the Slimes is saying is do what you want just don’t hurt our crypto marxist nominee.
The steady trickle to Obama has now destroyed her once formidable SPD (Super Politician Delegate) lead.
She’s toast and now knows it. She will not go out with a bang but with a whimper.
That whimper may include some stupid speech with her crying (for herself).
She’s so pathetic. All those years seeking power on Bill’s coat tails and now she finds herself eclipsed by a black guy from her real home state with even less experience than she does.
Oh the irony. :)
Obviously the NY Times was never really supportive of a woman president. or else they would wait for the cenvention vote of the person they are supposed to have endorsed. There is ample precendent for candidates waiting until the vote on the floor.
Sure, they call this an "editorial," but there is no by-line.
Tell us, again, NYT, that you're a newspaperRAPER.
She owes more to millions of Americans who have voted for her
THAT’S THE POINT. She and old willy take and take and take and take and NEVER GIVE BACK NOR do they care about those who GAVE AND GAVE AND GAVE AND GAVE AND GAVE.
My dad used to say in life there are people who take and take and take and NEVER give anything back. The clintins are the takers of this world.
The nation? I don't think so.
Very revealing... “leaving her integrity intact” — two references to this. Do you think the NY Times really buys that she has any integrity left? Hey, fellas: Do you think your integrity is still intact?!
“But we believe just as strongly that Mrs. Clinton will be making a terrible mistake....”
In other words...good luck staying even as Senator from NY unless you do as we tell you....