Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ICE: Law Doesn't Bar Illegals from College
UPI ^ | May 9, '08 | Staff

Posted on 05/10/2008 7:18:55 AM PDT by T.L.Sink

There is no federal law banning states from admitting illegal immigrants to colleges and universities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said. The statement contradicts a letter issued this week by the North Carolina Attorney General, who advised the State Community College System that federal law prohibits the admission of illegal immigrants to public colleges and universities. "The Department of Homeland Security does not require any school to determine a student's status," the department said.

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: academia; aliens; bleedingusdry; bloodsuckers; crimaliens; education; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Feel bad because qualified students are being bumped by the unqualified by affirmative action? To that we can now add that citizen students may be bumped to make room for illegal aliens. By the way, most state and community colleges are funded by taxpayers. So now we've discovered one more way to add the many ways we already subsidize illegals!
1 posted on 05/10/2008 7:18:55 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
There would be no criminal invader admission problem if they had been thrown back across the river?

Throw weight for this model is 300 pounds.

2 posted on 05/10/2008 7:23:49 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Do we really want either Huma Abedin or Michelle Obama answering the White House phone at 3 AM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

That totally works!


3 posted on 05/10/2008 7:28:42 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Praise God and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
There is no federal law banning states from admitting illegal immigrants to colleges and universities,

Like wise, there is no federal law granting the dept of home land security the rights to supersede the state constitution and the laws of the state.

4 posted on 05/10/2008 7:32:15 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

I declare that if a college or university has a policy that admits illegals, all Federal monies should be immediately cut off.


5 posted on 05/10/2008 7:45:57 AM PDT by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

But won’t they miss a lot of classes? What with the federal government enforcing the laws that DO exist, protecting our borders and all? /ssssssarc


6 posted on 05/10/2008 7:47:04 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

The malfeasance of our government continues. Votes clearly remain far more important than the integrity of America and its system of laws, the security of our nation, and the value of American citizenship. As long as voters continue to put power-driven pols in Washington, this travesty will continue.


7 posted on 05/10/2008 7:48:48 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
As long as voters continue to put power-driven pols in Washington...

Governement always and only attracts this type of people. This is precisely why the founders limited the power of government itself, via the Constitution.

Now if only we could find a copy of this Constitution, we could have it Xerox'd and distributed around Washington. Then the illegal overreaches of these power-driven folks would be brought to a screeching halt. /sarc

But seriously... It is apparent the Constitution itself is inadequate to the task of restraining the federal government.
8 posted on 05/10/2008 8:03:07 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Not only that but, in California, illegals are able to claim in-state tuition. Out of state Americans have to pay more than illegals to attend state funded universities (UCLA, Berkeley, etc.).


9 posted on 05/10/2008 8:04:40 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Out of state Americans have to pay more than illegals to attend state
funded universities (UCLA, Berkeley, etc.).


Which is of course, illegal. As law says government can't give
a benefit to illegals unless it's also extended to legal residents
and citizens of the USA.

Some law professor at U-Missouri at Kansas City is representing some
real-American students in a law suit on this. (Because places like
California are breaking the law).
10 posted on 05/10/2008 8:12:56 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I prefer Michelle Malkin’s title: Department of Homeland Insecurity.


11 posted on 05/10/2008 8:27:33 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I agree. In addition to the multitude of problems the illegal invasion is bringing us, it’s also incredible that the government is oblivious to dangers of insecure borders in this age of international terrorism.


12 posted on 05/10/2008 8:31:52 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

“There is no federal law banning states from admitting illegal immigrants to colleges and universities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said.”

‘I’m not a smart man, but...’ (Forrest Gump)

Seems to me that the “illegal” part of illegal immigrant kinda covers it.


13 posted on 05/10/2008 8:40:58 AM PDT by AbnSarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
"The Department of Homeland Security does not require any school to determine a student's status," the department said.


14 posted on 05/10/2008 8:42:44 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool; All

Article.IV., Section.4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Governmet, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.

Obviously, this part of the Constitution is being ignored and the foreign invasion continues apace. The plain English meaning and original intent are clear. But if the government is controlled by ethnocentric pressure groups, special-interest business lobbies and activist judges with a liberal agenda, it doesn’t matter what the law says. It’s ignored or misinterpreted to suit their interests.


15 posted on 05/10/2008 8:45:12 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

I would definately call that a “crew-served weapon.”

Although, I suppose on guy could use it, with a firing rate of about one round a month.

And it needs aiming stakes.


16 posted on 05/10/2008 8:48:33 AM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
Those in Congress who ignore the US Constitution have a reason.

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.
But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.
But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.
A murderer is less to be feared."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

17 posted on 05/10/2008 8:50:08 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AbnSarge

Right - but you’ve got common sense and that gets us nowhere with the open-borders crew!


18 posted on 05/10/2008 8:50:56 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

And if Americans don’t like it, our government will import Mexicans to vote for it - just another “job Americans won’t do.”


19 posted on 05/10/2008 8:54:09 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

A very appropriate quote. Cicero speaks to every age. Here’s another quote that I think is compatable: “Those who do not remember the past are condemned to relive it.” - Santayana


20 posted on 05/10/2008 8:59:31 AM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson