Skip to comments.
Nutter, Rendell want assault-weapons ban - NRA says they exploit Liczbinski death (new federal AWB!)
Philadelphia Daily News ^
| May. 9, 2008
| CATHERINE LUCEY
Posted on 05/09/2008 10:34:55 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: Travis McGee
Paging our little buddy Chuckie Bloomer! :-)
21
posted on
05/09/2008 11:01:57 AM PDT
by
hiredhand
(Check my "about" page. I'm the Prophet of Doom!)
To: messierhunter
Sorry, back for more, found another sentence that made my blood boil.
"The National Rifle Association must explain to the public how they can stand behind criminals who have access to these kind of weapons while purporting to protect the Second Amendment right."
Horse dung. The NRA does NOT support the right to own guns of any kind for criminals. Gun grabbers like to accuse the NRA of such for their support of FOPA, which dared to clarify the list of persons prohibited from owning a gun. To anyone with half a brain and the willingness to be intellectually honest, the purpose of the NRA in supporting that bill, which covered far more than that, was not to allow criminals to own guns. FOPA also provided common sense gun rights, like the right to pass through a state with strict gun laws without being arrested for having a firearm locked and unloaded in your car. To gun grabbers like these idiots, that's probably tantamount to supporting the right of a "criminal" who is breaking that state's ban on gun ownership (say, of owning or possessing assault rifles).
To: neverdem
Why don’t they investigate how this criminal got this weapon? Too much work huh?...TYPICAL!
23
posted on
05/09/2008 11:04:37 AM PDT
by
Edgerunner
(At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
To: neverdem
I think the police should set a good example and relinquish whatever assault weapons they might have. Maybe they can move on up to sidearms.
To: jrd
“we have a couple thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem”
We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.
How many are there?
http://www.gunlaws.com/faq.htm#howmany
25
posted on
05/09/2008 11:06:45 AM PDT
by
petro45acp
(NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
To: neverdem
"If it's not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list."
26
posted on
05/09/2008 11:09:55 AM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat lead.)
To: hiredhand
Mayor Nutter and Gov. Rendell called upon Congress to enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.How, with a giant magnet that will suck them up from the street?
Liberals would be funny, if they were not so dangerous.
27
posted on
05/09/2008 11:12:19 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: neverdem
"Those weapons have one goal and use in mind," Nutter said. "They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible..."
Really Nutter? Am I destroying a human being in this picture?
No Nutter, I'm not destroying a human being here, but I am having fun destroying your claim.
To: neverdem
"The time has come for politicians to decide," said Rendell at the City Hall news conference attended by top police brass and state elected officials. "You have to decide whether you're on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby."I think the time has about come for the American people to decide if they are on the side of the Constitution or on the side of lowlife politicians.
29
posted on
05/09/2008 11:12:28 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
To: neverdem
>Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey then got into the mix.
>If it’s not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list.”
Carry that down to every type of gun, why don’t you?
What part of “the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” do you not understand?
And he is the Chief of Police?
Philly has bigger problems than it is able to understand.
30
posted on
05/09/2008 11:14:58 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: bill1952
“That reload when the trigger is pulled”. Like a Revolver?
31
posted on
05/09/2008 11:19:37 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
"Those weapons have one goal and use in mind," Nutter said. "They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible." Which is, I suppose, why so many police forces employ them, include Philadelphia's... ?
32
posted on
05/09/2008 11:24:52 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: petro45acp
we have a FEW thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem
We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.
How many are there?
maybe I should have used Few instead of couple.
33
posted on
05/09/2008 11:30:28 AM PDT
by
jrd
To: petro45acp
we have a FEW thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem
We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.
How many are there?
maybe I should have used Few instead of couple.
34
posted on
05/09/2008 11:30:30 AM PDT
by
jrd
To: neverdem
And you can bet that all three frontrunners will allow such a bill to pass and be signed into law. That is what happens when you have a Pseudo-Republican who wants desperately to be a Democrat running against another who is officially a Democrat.
And all three have proven records of not caring at all for the US Constitution.
35
posted on
05/09/2008 11:30:48 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
To: neverdem
It’s not the guns on the street, you lazy incompetent cowards...... it’s the criminals on the street.
36
posted on
05/09/2008 11:31:31 AM PDT
by
Gator113
(Obama is a member of the Far Wright Conspiracy.......)
To: TigersEye
>The time has come for
politicians to decide," said Rendell at the City Hall ...
>>I think the time has about come for the American people to decide if they are on the side of the Constitution or on the side of lowlife politicians.
Exactly. - Stop FR. We have the FR quote of the day.
37
posted on
05/09/2008 11:33:22 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: DCBryan1
Which politician? I just finished reading it yesterday.
38
posted on
05/09/2008 11:34:45 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
To: 2banana
39
posted on
05/09/2008 11:35:29 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
To: ctdonath2
I know they made them remove the bayonet lug off them. This has stopped all drive by jabbings in Philadelphia!
40
posted on
05/09/2008 11:36:20 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Hillary deserves the CMoH for her time in Tuzla!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson