Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Operation CHAOS (but the perp just doesn't know it...)
1 posted on 05/07/2008 3:49:46 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather
“Name The Party” - Another negative article on a Democrat, with no explicit party affiliation.
2 posted on 05/07/2008 3:55:37 PM PDT by mlstier ("The Right to Privacy does not trump the Right to Life" -- Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

If all third political parties really want a decent example as to why they can’t make any serious inroads politically against both the Republicans and the Democrats, then they should look at Ohio’s ongoing political “mess”. The Republicans there had their problems, and now, it’s the Democrats there that are having problems. Despite all of the problems in Ohio with both D’s and R’s, the majority of voters there still won’t vote third party as a serious political alternative.


4 posted on 05/07/2008 4:34:38 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Vote for conservatives AT ALL POLITICAL LEVELS! Encourage all others to do the same on November 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Lawmakers and top state leaders in both political parties have called for Dann's resignation after he admitted Friday to an affair with a subordinate that he said contributed to an atmosphere where sexual harassment was permissible.

Let's parse this a bit, shall we?

"He had an affair with a subordinate." An "affair" means more than one time, and by mutual consent, i.e., the lady was ready,willing and able.

He "contributed to an atmosphere where sexual harassment was permissible". He contributed. No where does it say he established and singularly maintained said atmosphere. And just how, specifically, did he contribute? That being the case didn't she likewise contribute to said atmosphere? She is libel to official prosecution?

Politics is a smash mouth game. It's therefore pretty much a given this is guy has political enemies. Does this gal factor in? If so, how? To what degree? Would her past [viz. office politics] stand up to similar investigation(s) as his? Which is the closer category for her: Anita Hill or Ellie Mae Clampett?

Frankly this sounds like a hatchet job on this poor SOB. I'm not defending him in the least, but like I said before politics is smash mouth game.

5 posted on 05/07/2008 4:52:29 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson