IIRC, if the Demos had winner take all voting, Hillary would have won.
1. The “most pledged delegates” or “highest popular vote” arguments are meaningless. The only important fact is that Obama (so far) has not won enough delegates for a first-ballot victory. What that means is that he has failed (so far) to win the nomination. I know everyone knows this, but Obama-backers and media types keep acting like there’s some kind of moral “obligation” to give it to the guy in the lead.
If Hillary is such a superior candidate, then why has Hillary not been able to close the deal in this campaign? Why has your girl, with all the advantages coming in, been upstaged by a rookie senator?
how can you say obama avoided debates?
“Debate without moderator? Obama declines
‘I’m not ducking. We’ve had 21 debates’ already, he says of Clinton idea.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24327554/
Obabma’s inability to close the deal is a major political failure, one noted by a lot of Dems.
Thanks for the comments - I have to go out for a while - I can reply to comments when I return this evening.
OK Hillary, put on your best Tom “Risky Business” Cruise smile, put your Foster Grant Wayfares on and say: “Looks Like 2012!”
I wonder if Osama Obama is in Hill's FBI files.
I would rather see either Obama or McCain win than to see Adolph Hitler or Joseph Stalin win. I cannot say the same of Hillary Clinton. If the only names on the ballot were Ahmadinejad and Clinton, I would still vote against her.
The number one case for Hilary is there are no rules in the Democrat Party.
I kind of wish we would have had a fight in the Republican primary. I think conservatism is worth fighting for. In the Democrat Party they are just fighting for individual power.