Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman: US Democrats won't thwart missile shield
Prague Daily Monitor ^ | 5/6/08 | ČTK

Posted on 05/06/2008 11:22:36 AM PDT by Dawnsblood

The U.S.-planned missile shield in Europe, including on Czech soil, enjoys majority support in the U.S. Congress though certain doubts persist on the part of some Democrat congresspeople, Bud Cramer, himself a Democrat member of the House of Representatives, told CTK in Prague Monday.

If a candidate of the opposition Democrats became the next U.S. president, it would change nothing in the missile defence plans of the current U.S. Administration of George W.Bush, a Republican, Cramer said.

If a Democrat won the the presidential elections later this year, it would turn out that the missile defence plan had reached the point of no return, Cramer said.

He said the Congress inclines to support missile defence that would include a U.S. radar base in the Czech Republic. Nevertheless, there are some Democrats who still doubt certain aspects of the project and maybe the project as a whole, and they also doubt whether the USA should spend money on it, Cramer said.

(Excerpt) Read more at praguemonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: czechrepublic; missledefence; poland

1 posted on 05/06/2008 11:22:36 AM PDT by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Don’t tell Obama, he is determined to throw the US under the bus!


2 posted on 05/06/2008 11:27:32 AM PDT by A. Morgan (VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

3 posted on 05/06/2008 11:28:58 AM PDT by gridlock (The natural state of the world is Darfur. The freakish aberration is America - - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

The reason why the Democrats are now having to try and reassure our allies on this is because within the last few days, Obama declared that if (God forbid) he got elected President, he would look to slow down and scale back the development of combat systems, including the missile defense system.


4 posted on 05/06/2008 11:29:17 AM PDT by jpl ("Don't tell me words don't matter." - Barack Obama, via Deval Patrick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

LOL

This is so history at this point. Much of the ground work (agreements, planning, funding) was done as far back as 2000-2003, but it’s just now getting in the news because spades are touching ground.


5 posted on 05/06/2008 11:37:36 AM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Precisely!


6 posted on 05/06/2008 11:51:05 AM PDT by kitkat (Over the Hill(ary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Another evil Bush administration plan that all Americans hate him for because there are Mexicans.


7 posted on 05/06/2008 12:12:02 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama's bus needs a lift kit just to clear all the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl

Yep, Obama did say that.


8 posted on 05/06/2008 12:13:04 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama's bus needs a lift kit just to clear all the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

This denial is inoperative. The Democrats have demonstrated for 20 years that they understand outright killing a purely defensive programme is a political loser.

Their policy instead has been delay and denial of deployment, hoping to stall the programme long enough that offensive technology can surpass it and then render the programme impotent and, therefore, unthreatening to the global community bien pensants who currently oppose it.

When a Democrat says “further testing and development” he means “keep testing until no one cares whether or not it works.”


9 posted on 05/06/2008 12:17:15 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
That is another lie by a democrat. The democrats are against the shield, and have been since Reagan basically invented it. They will kill it in stealth since they don't want to get blamed for any consequences and they know the public wants it.
10 posted on 05/06/2008 12:30:17 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

The heck they won’t.


11 posted on 05/06/2008 12:41:54 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Hmm...the Iranian Shahab programs plus a “peaceful” nuclear warhead or two...suddenly a missile defense program doesn’t look so provocative anymore...


12 posted on 05/06/2008 1:04:33 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson