Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yeah, Hillary has as much chance of fixing OPEC as Barack Obama does of successfully invading Pakistan.
1 posted on 05/06/2008 6:05:52 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM

People (justifiably) criticize McCain for not being very knowledgable about economics. But it seems pretty clear that he understands more than Hillary about our (in)ability to force OPEC to do our bidding.


2 posted on 05/06/2008 6:09:06 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
I do believe Hillary has gone right 'round the bend.
From Socialist to bald-faced Communist.
3 posted on 05/06/2008 6:09:38 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

This from a person who says the oil companies should pay the tax and not the consumer..........what an idiot......


4 posted on 05/06/2008 6:12:41 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

I am sure that they will pay attention to a woman.


7 posted on 05/06/2008 6:19:48 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
Guys, guys, guys.

Hillary is RIGHT about the use of the Sherman anti trust act of 1933 in combating OPEC.

This law is, and has been, a model for like laws worldwide and is ratified in numerous reciprocal treaties with the US, including the WTO!

It has been used against many US companies, including Microsoft, both here and abroad, and our partners are bound by treaty to uphold it.

Here is the rub:
There is a clause in the treaty/law that can exclude industries that a country deems necessary to National Security.
The real fly in the ointment is that nobody ever envisioned a situation where the country involved would OWN that industry!

These exemption's are agreed upon and can be removed.
We could - if we wanted to - declare the OPEC cartel an illegal combination in restraint of trade.

Which it surely is!!

Why should we be held to legal frameworks that do not apply to a bunch of filthy anti American Arabs and such, who are screwing America as hard as they can?

We should remove OPEC from the National Security excemption status that it currently enjoys!

10 posted on 05/06/2008 6:22:30 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
Hillary would be a foreign policy DISASTER for the entire western world. Just look at all those wannabe Clintonista hacks lined up behind her waiting to jump into running the show for her “administration”... Sandy Berger, Madeline Albright...Huma.

When Hillary made a speech in Indiana last weekend about how she was going to TAKE that $55 billion in profits away from the oil companies- she looked absolutely reptilian. Like a gila monster flicking her forky tongue at an insect.

shuddderrr at the thought of having to hear and see that raspy arrogant smug socialista in the White House.........

13 posted on 05/06/2008 6:27:37 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

The axiom of the Leftist: “I’m right, and everyone will do what I say if I can just get them to listen to me! I shall declare what shall be, and it shall be!” They don’t have to cooperate with anyone, but everyone will cooperate with them.

Yeah. A bunch of uber-super-rich sheiks will give up their source of fortune and power because some lady on the other side of the planet says they should. Right.


14 posted on 05/06/2008 6:27:43 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
"I want to go after the ... speculators and the manipulators of the money, because they're the ones who I think are really behind this," So Hillary is going after the Federal Reserve?
15 posted on 05/06/2008 6:28:26 AM PDT by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
The only way to break the cartel is to encourage the production (or discourage the consumption) of oil outside the cartel countries. So, unless Clinton proposes to encourage drilling in areas with proven reserves or raise federal taxes or CAFE standards even further, she is just expelling hot air ...
16 posted on 05/06/2008 6:28:30 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

Hillary does not have a clue. OPEC would be happy to sell plenty of oil to China and turn off the tap to the US. What is she going to do, bomb them?

The quickest way to reduce oil prices is for the US gov. to announce that we are allowing drilling in ANWAR, off the coast, and anywhere on federal land. Leases for $1.

Just the announcement would drop the price of oil. Don’t even have to put a drill bit in the ground.


18 posted on 05/06/2008 6:30:43 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

She is an idiot...

or rather, those that fall for her B/S are the idiots


20 posted on 05/06/2008 6:31:50 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

Oh great. Maybe Madame President can do the same for the oil companies as she did for our flu shots. If the Beast get elected expect gas lines again!


41 posted on 05/06/2008 7:02:03 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (I miss Ronnie!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

hey Hillary opec just called-they said you have no “gravitas”


49 posted on 05/06/2008 7:22:25 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

hey Hillary opec just called-they said you have no “gravitas”


50 posted on 05/06/2008 7:22:33 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

I see in the interview that hillary has replaced ‘you know’ to ‘well’ to start all her sentences.

not an improvement.


51 posted on 05/06/2008 7:26:14 AM PDT by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

I had a conversation with my aunt a few months back. She forwarded me an e-mail about how the rich oil company owners were manipulating prices at the expense of the poor. I asked her if she had an IRA and she said yes. I asked her if she had any oil company stocks. She said she wasn’t sure, but might have some. I told her that she was one of the rich oil company owners and needed to go to the next stockholders meeting and demand the company stop making a profit and start selling oil at cost.


58 posted on 05/06/2008 7:48:21 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

When she ran for the senate in New York she promised 250, 000 jobs to the upstate area. I think the last time I read anything about it, they had lost an additional 200,000 jobs.


59 posted on 05/06/2008 7:51:07 AM PDT by anoldafvet (To liberals, building a wall across the Mexican border is a violation of the Voting Rights Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson