Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Muslim Battalion Guards the Queen
minsitry of defense ^ | 5/8/08 | A History and Honour news article

Posted on 05/04/2008 6:27:02 PM PDT by Flavius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Fox_Mulder77
I’m sure their weapons aren’t loaded.>>>>>>>>>>>>> One always is, usually the gunnery sargeant or his equivalent. The CO can be locked and loaded, his call.
41 posted on 05/05/2008 4:46:59 AM PDT by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dan Cooper
The Royal Maylay regiment is a tough unit, or they would not have been assigned the duty.
42 posted on 05/05/2008 4:48:23 AM PDT by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Notice that the redcoats have magazines in their weapons. Smart move. I hope they are loaded.


43 posted on 05/05/2008 4:53:01 AM PDT by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

“So Britain segregates their armed forces”

Err, that’s not a British Army Regiment.

But have you ever heard of the Gurkhas?

And, yes, Regiments in the British Army have traditionally been based on geographical areas: The Argyle and Sutherland Highlanders, The Irish Guards, The Queens Lancashire Regiment, The Welsh Guards, etc.


44 posted on 05/05/2008 5:22:38 AM PDT by UKTory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

“Guess they don’t believe in separation of church and state.”

Who doesn’t? The Queen? Given that she’s the head of the Church of England you wouldn’t really need to guess, would you?


45 posted on 05/05/2008 5:24:55 AM PDT by UKTory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

This doesn’t make sense. I was always led to believe that allegiance to the Queen was a prerequisite for guarding her. This is why some commonwealth countries, such as Jamaica, Canada Australia etc have been able to mount her guard (increasingly frequently as demand is put on British guards to go on active service abroad) but not those from republican countries.

The Royal Malaysia Regiment’s allegiance is to the Malaysian Royal family, so that should mean they are not eligable to guard our Queen....


46 posted on 05/05/2008 7:54:40 AM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

Yes. At least until the next attack.


47 posted on 05/05/2008 8:57:24 AM PDT by homeguard ((Charlie Don't Surf!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
A noble regiment indeed.

Some knee jerk reactions on this thread.

48 posted on 05/05/2008 3:36:21 PM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: homeguard

Utter non-sense. What next? The roundup and expulsion of all American Muslims from the U.S.? It just isn’t going to happen.


49 posted on 05/07/2008 4:30:50 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

Nope, never have.

Unlike you.


50 posted on 05/07/2008 3:08:27 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: homeguard

Idiotic comment.

Try learning some British military history.

p.s there are Muslim soldiers fighting and dying for Britain in Iraq and Afghanistan, and some have won bravery medals,a few have even made the ultimate sacrifice...


51 posted on 05/07/2008 3:10:58 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett

Are you that dumb?.

Learn some British military history, mate.The RMR are a fine regiment who have served Britain for decades.

Do you lot REALLY think all ‘Mooslims’ on the earth are a threat?.What about the brave Muslims in your armed forces or ours?...


52 posted on 05/07/2008 3:13:28 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

Ignorant is the word I’d use.

I have been simply astounded at the stupidity and ignorance of the majority of posters in this thread.


53 posted on 05/07/2008 3:16:04 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman
OK. First, I'm not your "mate". With your insulting attitude, I doubt you have many real "mates".

Second, I don't need a lesson in British military history to believe this is a bad idea. I wouldn't want a regiment of them guarding our President either. No, I don't think all "Mooslims" are a threat but, I do believe it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to safeguarding the life of a country's leader. Decades??? My answer to that: 9/11/01, USS Cole, US Embassy Lebanon, to name a few. Some people fail to learn from history - even recent history, obviously.

54 posted on 05/07/2008 3:37:08 PM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (I'd rather be single than wish I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett

Firstly, mate is a term used by British people, usually in sarcasm, it isnt meant literally.

Secondly, apologies if I was rude, but I took and take great offence at the insults here being heaped on a legendary regiment who fought in the British Army, and my anger manifested itself in my language.Again, apologies.

Thirdly, again, I ask you to look at the history of this regiment. The fact they are Muslims means bugger all.They are a fine regiment with a fine history of service to Britain.

Lastly, why are they a threat?. We have had thousands of Irish Catholics in our ranks, and did even one help the IRA?.No, they served as the British soldiers they were and helped defeat the IRA.

There are Muslims in your armed forces and ours and Canada’s, Australia’s, France’s....what about them?.

The response here by FR posters to this group of fine men just ‘cos they is Moozlim is frankly ignorant and hysterical nonsense.

p.s please dont tell us about terrorism...weve been dealing with it and defeating it since the days of the Fenians in the 1860’s...


55 posted on 05/07/2008 4:33:44 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett

http://www.avalanchepress.com/RealTiger.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Malay_Regiment


56 posted on 05/07/2008 4:40:21 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Flavius

They were Sikhs.


57 posted on 05/08/2008 6:28:42 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Well said!


58 posted on 05/08/2008 6:32:10 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman
Childish response.....we live in a different world now....this is a religious war....it requires extraordinary measures to ensure our survival...to believe anything less is naive and suicidal.....
59 posted on 05/09/2008 5:12:46 PM PDT by homeguard ((SPQR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: homeguard

Childish response?. Yeah, whatever, to use one of your nation’s phrases.

Look, we are all concerned about the WOT and security but this hysterical nonsense seeing every Muslim as a terrorist is silly and futile.If we were to follow that logic to its conclusion, we would have to bar anyone with any Muslim background from serving in any armed force, police or security position.Or any top position nationally...

If you lot are scared by a 130 strong group from a legendary Muslim ww2 unit, then that frankly says more about America than Britain. Sorry, but us silly Limeys have been through more terrorism and destruction than America can possibly imagine over the last 150 years, from terrorism to having been bombed in two world wars and we will continue to keep that silly old stiff upper lip and sensible clear head about our enemies if you dont mind. Getting overly paranoid gets you nowhere. But you become paranoid and see an enemy behind every pillar if you want..

Do you honestly believe that a troop of the RMR, who fought with the British in ww2,are actually a danger?. Are they any more a ‘danger’ than the thousands of Muslims who serve in Western armed forces, police and security?.

Yes, it ‘takes only one’. But what about white Muslims?.Or back Muslims?. Or mixed race?. Or do you think every ‘Moozlim’ is a brown skin?.Evil isnt exclusive to any one race, colour, creed etc...

And last I looked, Oswald, McVeigh, Squeeky Frome and all the others who have blown and killed Americans, from the Oklahoma to Presidents, have all been white.

Oh, and wasnt the last US Muslim arrested for treasonous behaviour just a normal soldier serving in the US Army?. Americans might expend more of their energy cleaning up their own houses before criticising the Limeys, Canucks and the Eurotrash...


60 posted on 05/10/2008 6:35:42 AM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson