To: TexasCajun
Proof positive that neither of them have ever read the Constitution. Then again, most libs have not.
4 posted on
05/02/2008 12:30:47 PM PDT by
NoKoolAidforMe
(One Nation-Under God. There, I said it.)
To: NoKoolAidforMe
To a lib, the Constitution only means what the current supreme court says it means.
15 posted on
05/02/2008 12:35:09 PM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: NoKoolAidforMe
of course most libs have NOT read the consitution.
Otherwise, they would not insist that it says what it doesn’t say (right to privacy) and doesn’t say what it says (right to bear arms).
To: NoKoolAidforMe
Proof positive that neither of them have ever read the Constitution. Then again, most libs have not. Hard for a lib to read a moving living object.
47 posted on
05/02/2008 1:32:17 PM PDT by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson