1 posted on
05/02/2008 3:50:07 AM PDT by
Man50D
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Man50D
2 posted on
05/02/2008 3:57:20 AM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Republican...because not everyone can be on welfare.)
To: Man50D
Here's something for your data bank.

3 posted on
05/02/2008 4:07:58 AM PDT by
billorites
(Freepo ergo sum)
To: Man50D
So everyone’s DNA will be on file. They say it will be used for genetic research. A lie. Within a few years a law will be passed to allow it to be used for determining parentage. Then just about the time that the first subjects are old enough to commit their first crime, laws will be passed to use the database in “law enforcement”.
Criminals will know this, and obtain DNA from an innocent person and spread it around at a crime scene to get the innocent person convicted.
To: Man50D
I am glad I am done having kids.
I would certainly refuse to allow any such samples be taken, knowing where they would end up.
Might as well just insert a chip into ‘em at the same time.
5 posted on
05/02/2008 4:14:39 AM PDT by
Adder
(typical bitter white person)
To: Man50D
“The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essentially owned by the government, and every citizen becomes a potential subject...... WELCOME to the Feudal Manor.
8 posted on
05/02/2008 4:31:03 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: Man50D
Will this include anchor babies? Didn’t think so.
12 posted on
05/02/2008 5:37:29 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(Energy plan: Build refineries and nuke plants, drill for our oil, mine our coal.)
To: Man50D
This issue is already lost. States are passing laws to collect DNA from all registered sex offenders
retroactively without "due process of law."
Naturally, nobody complained.
You want to see what the next attacks on your liberty and privacy are, look at those despised by society.
"When they came for the Jews..."
18 posted on
05/02/2008 7:47:57 AM PDT by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
To: Man50D
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was one of the few voices to warn of the dangers. Before the plan's approval, he said, "I cannot support legislation, no matter how much I sympathize with the legislations stated goals, that exceed the Constitutional limitations on federal power or in any way threatens the liberty of the American people. Since S. 1858 violates the Constitution, and may have untended consequences that will weaken the American health care system and further erode medical privacy, I must oppose it."
Yeah, he sure sounds nutty. Not.
20 posted on
05/16/2008 10:38:15 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: Man50D
Can someone please tell me how a Big Brother DNA data base containing info on every newborn child can help the coountry in time of “national emergency”? If a child has a genetic abnormality or is a carrier for such, it should be a private matter between the child’s family and his or her physicians and health care providers. Government should simply butt out. Privacy over one’s medical information is essential to a civilized society!
To: Man50D
“The public is clueless”
So what’s new?
30 posted on
05/16/2008 11:59:43 PM PDT by
takenoprisoner
(shshshsh, the sheeple are sleeping and do not wish to be disturbed,)
To: Man50D
On a more serious note, at some time in our past clueless citizens surrendered their right to privacy. Perhaps it was for a false sense of security. Ron White got it right: “you can’t fix stupid.”
31 posted on
05/17/2008 12:08:45 AM PDT by
takenoprisoner
(shshshsh, the sheeple are sleeping and do not wish to be disturbed,)
To: Man50D
32 posted on
05/17/2008 12:18:58 AM PDT by
endthematrix
(Now that we use our corn for fuel, when do we eat coal for dinner?)
To: Man50D
Ah yes, good ol’ Chris Dodd. Wasn’t it his daddy that brought us the Gun Control Act of ‘68? The one that was translated and copied from a similar Nazi law?
Sso Claire, is it time yet?
38 posted on
05/17/2008 7:54:32 AM PDT by
oldfart
(The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
To: Man50D
41 posted on
05/17/2008 11:10:29 AM PDT by
ellery
(In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock -T. Jefferson)
To: Man50D
It says that consent is not needed and I do not even have to be informed.
But... what if I know of it and refuse? Is there and ‘opt out’?
To: Man50D
Another building block for totalitarian socialism.
43 posted on
05/17/2008 10:38:28 PM PDT by
SecAmndmt
(Arm yourselves!)
To: Man50D; All
google “T-4 program” then think of this in terms of nationalized health care. The folks that are going to be running the old folks home will literally end up selecting people to be eventually euthanized when the budgets start having shortfalls.
44 posted on
05/18/2008 8:12:04 AM PDT by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
To: Man50D; All
google “T-4 program” then think of this in terms of nationalized health care. The folks that are going to be running the old folks home will literally end up selecting people to be eventually euthanized when the budgets start having shortfalls.
45 posted on
05/18/2008 8:12:04 AM PDT by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
To: Man50D
The Bush Legacy. One shredded U.S. Constitution gone as a Bipartisan favor to the Dems. He has done more sickening deeds for them than they could have done to us in decades.
48 posted on
05/18/2008 9:35:11 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
(Three Blind Rats. Three Blind Rats, See How They Run. See How They Run. Hillbomacain)
To: Man50D
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy. As I live and breathe.
50 posted on
05/21/2008 3:30:01 PM PDT by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson