Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders FLDS newborn into state custody
Chron.com ^ | May 1, 2008 | MICHELLE ROBERTS

Posted on 05/01/2008 4:44:54 PM PDT by Politicalmom

SAN ANTONIO — A judge ordered that the baby boy born to a girl taken from a polygamist sect's ranch in West Texas be placed in state custody, according to documents released Thursday.

Texas District Judge Barbara Walther signed the order Wednesday giving the state custody of the 1-day-old infant born to a teen believed to be 15 or 16 years old.

The girl has claimed to be 18, according to an affidavit signed by Ruby Gutierrez, a Child Protective Services caseworker, but officials believe she is younger and placed her in foster care with other children taken from the ranch.

The newborn is the teen's second child; the first is a 20-month-old boy. The father of both children was identified as Jackson Jessop, 22, but state officials say they don't know his whereabouts.

Child welfare officials now have 464 children in their custody, swept from the Yearning For Zion Ranch in Eldorado because authorities believe underage girls were forced into marriages and sex with older men. Authorities are also now investigating possible sexual abuse of boys.

Church members have vehemently denied there was any abuse, and civil liberties groups have raised concerns at the sweeping nature of the removals.

Individual custody hearings are set to be completed by June 5.

CPS and law enforcement raided the ranch on April 3 after a girl who was purportedly 16 called a domestic abuse hotline to complain of abuse at the hands her much older husband. Authorities are investigating whether the calls were a hoax.

Regardless, child welfare authorities say 31 of the 53 girls aged 14-17 have children or are pregnant.

Under Texas law, children under the age of 17 generally cannot consent to sex with an adult. A girl can get married with parental permission at 16, but the girls who belong to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints are not believed to have legal marriages.

FLDS is a breakaway sect of the mainline Mormon church, which disavowed polygamy a century ago.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: childabuse; flds; mormonbashing; ruling; yfzranch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 701-708 next last
To: Hodar
Frankly, I’m kind of surprised we haven’t heard of hemophilia in the males.

Maybe that's what's in the graveyard. Untreated hemophiliac males are not likely to survive long.

361 posted on 05/01/2008 8:01:26 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: najida
Location and types of bone fractures are more telling than numbers.

I posted the location and types of the ones I had personal knowledge of (except mine I guess, it was a wrist). Post a link to yours.

362 posted on 05/01/2008 8:03:50 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: metmom

It’s rather ironic, isn’t it, that a group who wants to be ignored by the law persists in ignoring the law?


363 posted on 05/01/2008 8:04:38 PM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I’m just talking about work experience.


364 posted on 05/01/2008 8:05:04 PM PDT by najida (On FR- Most guys see themselves is Brad Pitt, and think every woman here is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Too bad Babyland isn’t in Texas. Utah and Arizona seem to have been sitting on their hands too long.


365 posted on 05/01/2008 8:05:05 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland (4-hshootingsports.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: najida

The only case I know of where the baby was taken was when there was incest in the home and the 13 year old son was alleged to be the father of the mother’s baby.

They put that baby into foster care right out of the hospital and was put up for adoption some time later.

Made me and everyone else familiar with the situation pretty convinced that it was more than a rumor.


366 posted on 05/01/2008 8:06:40 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
Do you have to hyperlink in red?

Geeesh, show a little flds respect...

;) PaMom

367 posted on 05/01/2008 8:06:50 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (I could never 'Keep Sweet' I am a bitter Pennsylvanian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I wrote I didn’t trust them. I’m suspicious of anything they say or claim.

"Trust, but verify"

368 posted on 05/01/2008 8:08:00 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Holy State or Holy King - Or Holy People's Will - Have no truck with the senseless thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
Post the x-rays on the Internet for everyone to see.

Or even a list of the bones broken and type of break along with the age of the child.

Liars is maybe a bit strong, but they might be twisting the facts and presenting them in an over sensationalized manner. Or they might not. But they need to give out more information. Or if they have, those arguing that the state has been completely honest and above board, need to at least post links to that information.

369 posted on 05/01/2008 8:08:12 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

the808bass: “Could that change for me? Yes. If evidence presented in this case becomes contradictory to the government’s claims, the former cultist’s claims, and the statements of their own teachings. Could your opinion change for you? I have my doubts.”

Why would you post a reasonable response like that then turn it into a personal attack? If it’s as bad as you claim, a position not yet proven, they need to throw the child molesters in prison. That, however, doesn’t justify a fishing expedition in order to build a case. Is that how it’s legally done these days? Have a suspicion? Round ‘em up and put them in custody until they prove they are innocent. Keep interrogating the children till the story is straight, right?


370 posted on 05/01/2008 8:08:43 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Member of CRAM - Conservative Resigned to Accept McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum

Parental consent? Hardly applicable here. Remember, the children all belong (are given over) to the profit (intentional misspelling).


371 posted on 05/01/2008 8:08:49 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (I could never 'Keep Sweet' I am a bitter Pennsylvanian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

The difference being simply this...
The vast majority of the girls having children while underage are doing so:
a - as a result of voluntary intercourse, and
b - as a result of intercourse with someone at or near their own age.

Do you not see a problem with a group of people engaging in the systematic sexual abuse of young women within their families and community and calling it religion?


372 posted on 05/01/2008 8:10:44 PM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
So, out of a sample size of 462 children, we have just under 10% with evidence of a broken bone....1 in 10 kids having a broken bone can't be that far off the statistical norm for this age group. Now, show me some evidence of cigarette scars, and you have a topic. But this truly appears to be a distortion by the media.

You're the one engaging in (mathematical & just plain common sense) distortion. You're "under 10%" just doesn't work.

According to an MSNBC report: “We do not have X-rays or complete medical information on many children so it is too early to draw any conclusions based on this information, but it is cause for concern and something we’ll continue to examine,” the CPS report said. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24388249/

The person said "many" and not "most"--so the inference is less than half...who knows? Maybe 30-40% they don't have -- probably almost 200 of the kids.

Then when you figure that over 70% of the ones they are holding are 9 & younger...you begin to wonder. I mean over 100 of the "kids" are actually infants or the youngest of toddlers (0-2). Since they said some of these were "very young" how many 2 yo do you see with broken arms?

200 of the kids are 5 & under. That leaves over 250 6 & up--of whom perhaps 40% or so have not undergone exams (guestimate of about 100 of that age group).

Now you're down to 150 kids who are 6 & up who've probably undergone exams -- and the bulk of them constitute the "41 kids." So just with this "guestimate" you're up to 25% of the kids.

373 posted on 05/01/2008 8:11:27 PM PDT by Colofornian (What's a planetary compound w/a local god ruling polygamous wives? LDS celestial kingdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

THEY ARE TURNED OUT AT 13, 14, 15. NOT AS ADULTS. Google “flds lost boys” and see what you find.


374 posted on 05/01/2008 8:11:55 PM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Colofornian: “And how many of those breaks occurred when you were “very young”—which is what the Texas agency is reporting?”

All before I was eight. First was broken at about 5 when I slipped on some ice and broke my fall (literally) with my shoulder.


375 posted on 05/01/2008 8:11:57 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Member of CRAM - Conservative Resigned to Accept McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Or they might not. But they need to give out more information. Or if they have, those arguing that the state has been completely honest and above board, need to at least post links to that information.

With all due respect, TX doesn't have to give the media a minute by minute or bone by bone account. The information will be given to the defense counsel of the those charged during the trial proceedings.

376 posted on 05/01/2008 8:12:51 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (I could never 'Keep Sweet' I am a bitter Pennsylvanian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Witch hunt? Interrogators?

Do you have a problem with them investigating clearly illegal activity?

If they don’t investigate and collect evidence, there will be no charges and the rapists will go free. If they do, they’re witch hunters and interrogators.

So which way do you want it? Do they investigate or let them go free?


377 posted on 05/01/2008 8:13:16 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Is that how it’s legally done these days? Have a suspicion? Round ‘em up and put them in custody until they prove they are innocent. Keep interrogating the children till the story is straight, right?

If you presuppose that they're "interrogating the children until the story is straight," then what do you expect your conclusion will find? I am well aware of instances where the interrogators have abused their position and become more suggestive than interrogatory. I think there are some minimal safeguards against that possibility here.

I have no idea why you are sure that the state is out to get this bizarre cult of polygamous child molesters. (See how fun stating one's personal conclusion of fact is?)

378 posted on 05/01/2008 8:13:40 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

A flyover isn’t exactly a visit. I get flyovers from the USAF every day, I don’t consider them visitors. And the reason some households are one mom/one dad is because dad hasn’t been ‘good enough’ to get awarded more wives. They’ve got to have at least 3 to get anywhere good in the afterlife. Of course, the downside to that is if you displease the leaders, you get your wife/wives and family taken away and reassigned to a more deserving man.

So much for ‘family values’.


379 posted on 05/01/2008 8:15:15 PM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66
And the reason some households are one mom/one dad is because dad hasn’t been ‘good enough’ to get awarded more wives.

According to the records of "the bishop" which were presented at the hearings, only 1/3 of the families are not currently polygamous. That includes some young men who are probably not old enough to have garnered the respect necessary to get another wife.

380 posted on 05/01/2008 8:16:58 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 701-708 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson