Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/01/2008 11:00:39 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: blam

Largest by volume. Superior is largest by surface area.


2 posted on 05/01/2008 11:05:44 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“This lake was expected to be among those most resistant to climate change, due to its tremendous volume and unique water circulation.”

LOL! That was good. New and improved! Climate Change resistant!


3 posted on 05/01/2008 11:05:57 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The Russians have a history of making large lakes dissappear. Disliquidated,I would say.


4 posted on 05/01/2008 11:06:24 AM PDT by OeOeO (Sic Transit Gloria Mundi... Gloria get me a beer,and hurry..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Of course it does. So does global cooling. So do local climate changes. None of which can scientifically or signficantly be pinned on humans.


5 posted on 05/01/2008 11:07:40 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Consensus of scientists regarding global warming Drawing on 60 years of long-term studies of Russia's Lake Baikal, Stephanie Hampton, an ecologist and deputy director of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in Santa Barbara, Calif., and Marianne Moore, a biologist at Wellesley College in Wellesley, Mass., along with four other scientists, report their results on-line today in the journal Global Change Biology.

Wow that stands out like a sore thumb.
6 posted on 05/01/2008 11:09:03 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

LOL Scientists who claim to have a consensus about global warming don’t seem to be able to come to a consensus about what is occuring right now. I read an article yesterday that said scientists (apparently just some scientists) think that global warming is going to ‘stall’ until 2015.


7 posted on 05/01/2008 11:09:09 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Oops, guess I shouldn’t have poured that cup of hot Starbucks in the lake last week.


8 posted on 05/01/2008 11:09:19 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This only proves that global warming started well before man started emitting C02 in large quantities.


9 posted on 05/01/2008 11:09:58 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I wonder if these are “end point” measures. That is, compare 1946 to 2006 and measure the difference. If so, single-point statistics are notoriously weak in trend analysis yet people “on a mission” do it all the time.


10 posted on 05/01/2008 11:10:22 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"The conclusions shown here for this enormous body of freshwater result from careful and repeated sampling over six decade

Total BS. There was no serious consistent scientific study of the lake over that period. 60 years covers the aftermath of WW2 and the Cold War. That claim is pure BS. If they are willing to simply lie about this fact, what else are they lying about in their "Study"

Bureaucratic Institutions, like people and objects, develop inertia. This is an example of a bureaucracy being captured by their dogma and simply refusing to see anything that does not validate the preconceived template.

11 posted on 05/01/2008 11:10:30 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Science Daily ought to change it’s name to Climate Change Crisis Daily. It’s turned into a real rag.


13 posted on 05/01/2008 11:13:47 AM PDT by cake_crumb (At the rate Obama's going, his bus'll need a lift kit just to clear all the bodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Consensus of scientists regarding global warming Drawing on 60 years of long-term studies of Russia's Lake Baikal, Stephanie Hampton, an ecologist and deputy director of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in Santa Barbara, Calif., and Marianne Moore, a biologist at Wellesley College in Wellesley, Mass., along with four other scientists, report their results on-line today in the journal Global Change Biology.

"Warming of this isolated but enormous lake is a clear signal that climate change has affected even the most remote corners of our planet," Hampton said.

Another Gore Kool-aid drinker. It's due to worldwide global warming? What about any industrial discharges into the lake during Communist rule?? And the rest of the world has warmed in the past 40-60 years so this would be expected. Now as global cooling occurs (as per the scientists who recognize this is a cyclic event) can we expect the Gore addicts to recognize this as a natural event?? Not on your life!!

14 posted on 05/01/2008 11:13:57 AM PDT by CedarDave (Obama says he loves America. So why does he associate with those who so obviously hate it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I remember studying about Lake Baikal in high school and everyone was wringing their hands about how the Soviets were killing the lake with all kinds of toxins. So, I guess that problem has run its course and now it’s global warming.


16 posted on 05/01/2008 11:14:59 AM PDT by iceskater (This space intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"Thanks to the dedication of local scientists, who were also keen observers, coupled with modern synthetic approaches, we can now visualize and appreciate the far-reaching changes occurring in this lake."

As the earth warms, “modern synthetic approaches” melts into enviroscript for “invented facts.”

Interestingly, this linguistic visualization also happens as the earth cools, which further validates global warming.

18 posted on 05/01/2008 11:16:49 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I just read that the world temperature went down by 1 degree C in 2007. So we now have the liars trying to make a lake the victim of their lies about global warming which is NOT going on and cooling is starting to take place. As the normal cycle of the earth continues and the anti-humans want to blame humans and put them away in the ground.
23 posted on 05/01/2008 11:22:38 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; All
Russian and American scientists have discovered that the rising temperature of the world's largest lake, located in frigid Siberia, shows that this region is responding strongly to global warming.

Scientists ought to get together every once in while to compare notes.

Global warming on hold

24 posted on 05/01/2008 11:24:13 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
It couldn't possibly be related to this:

The lake has only one major inlet and one major outlet to carry most of its water. The inlet is the heavily-polluted Selenga River which flows in from northern Mongolia. It brings in almost one-half of Baikal's water.

or this:

Lake Baikal resides on one of the two deepest land depressions on Earth. (The other is the Marianas Trench in the Pacific.) The rift is over nine kilometers in depth. Little is understood about this huge fault zone. Hydrothermic vents below the surface cause heavy tectonic activity, with the result of minor earthquakes every few hours. Three large plates meet in this rift, which seven-kilometer-deep sediment shows to be more than 25 million years old.

or this:

Plans for the paper mill at Baikalsk began in 1954. The public was informed in 1957; protests were held, and ignored. The plant was built on the belief that heating Baikal's mineral-free waters, then spraying them over the pulp of the Siberian pines, would produce a "super" cellulose that could be used to make durable jet tires for Soviet Air Force planes. This was done during the Cold War under Nikita Khrushchev on the intelligence report that the U.S. was using the same procedure in Foley, Florida.(4) (In time, synthetics were found to be more conducive to tire manufacture.) The plant, however, continues to produce, polluting 200 square kilometers of the lake. This pollution affects the bottom-dwellers of the lake as well, for Lake Baikal's waters are thoroughly mixed, with oxygen found even at the lowest depths. In addition, the Angara carries some of this pollution westward.

It must be global warming. There can be no other possible explanation for the rise in temperature.

26 posted on 05/01/2008 11:35:50 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I’d like to know the error bars on that temperature increse figure.


29 posted on 05/01/2008 11:46:53 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“Increases in water temperature (1.21°C since 1946), chlorophyll a (300 percent since 1979), and an influential group of zooplankton grazers (335 percent since 1946) have important implications for nutrient cycling and food web dynamics.”

1) Hmm, more fish food. GLOBAL WARMING IS GOOD FOR PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE!

2) Most of the warming has been in northern land masses, ie Siberia. Is it surprising that this siberian lake is 1.2C warmer than 60 years ago??

3) All they’ve done is confirm that the lake follows local climate trends. Is the halt in global warming since 1998 relfected too?


30 posted on 05/01/2008 11:47:24 AM PDT by WOSG (Gameplan: Obama beats Hillary, McCain beats Obama, conservatives beat RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The really scary part is, in this lake’s 25 million year history, this is the first time it’s temperature has changed at all. Which means, of course, that we are all going to die.


32 posted on 05/01/2008 11:58:07 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson