Skip to comments.
Hispanic congressmen demand corporate action against CNN host[Lou Dobbs]
The Guardian ^
| 28 Apr 2008
| Elana Schor
Posted on 04/30/2008 9:51:46 AM PDT by BGHater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
"Words matter and words have power. One-sided rhetoric can lead other programs to cite opinions as fact and adopt polarising word choices as the standard," Baca, whose caucus is influential within the Democratic party, said.
Poor babies. Lou will get more viewers now.
1
posted on
04/30/2008 9:51:46 AM PDT
by
BGHater
To: BGHater
Am I missing something, or is it not singularly instructive that the offended congress”man” had to vent his displeasure in a British newspaper???
2
posted on
04/30/2008 9:54:57 AM PDT
by
MCCRon58
(Those who can, do. Those who cant, teach. Those who do neither, criticize.)
To: BGHater
Dobbs has become a sensation thanks to his populist outbursts honest talk against undocumented immigrants illegal aliens,
3
posted on
04/30/2008 9:56:23 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: BGHater
One-sided rhetoric can lead other programs to cite opinions as fact and adopt polarising word choices as the standard,"
You mean like global warming Congressman?
4
posted on
04/30/2008 9:58:09 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: BGHater
This is one area where I agree with Dobbs.
Time to reclaim the country, IMO...
5
posted on
04/30/2008 10:05:40 AM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
To: BGHater
Anyone who would silence someone who has opinions they find offensive and disagreeable, should be considered a traitor for trying to undermine the First Amendment. Anyone who does so is not fit to serve this country in any capacity.
6
posted on
04/30/2008 10:06:58 AM PDT
by
jack_napier
(Bob? Gun.)
To: BGHater
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. No law, but they can still lean on CNN like some Mafia Dons.
"Nice network you have here. It would be a shame if something "happened" to it."
7
posted on
04/30/2008 10:07:29 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
To: BGHater
"Words matter and words have power. One-sided rhetoric can lead other programs to cite opinions as fact and adopt polarising word choices as the standard," Baca, whose caucus is influential within the Democratic party, said. Translation: Journalists and television commentators should be obsequious--uh, sensitive--and choose such inoffensive terms as "undocumented workers" rather than the unadorned illegal aliens.
Got it.
8
posted on
04/30/2008 10:08:54 AM PDT
by
AmericanExceptionalist
(Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
To: All
..HISPANIC?...Why not, makes perfect sense to me (another Hispanic). I mean just look what the illegals do every day in our country ILLEGALLY!... Look at the support they get...
Please don't think these people are stupid. They understand that if the U.S. REALLY wanted to stop illegal Immigration they would do it an instant. So if they don't see that determination in our government - especially when our PRESIDENTE is sending the opposite message, they interpret it as being given the "wink."
They know that politically this has become a "hot potato," but they also understand that there are PLENTY of people who wants them.
That is why I never blame them... but I blame our government first.
---------------
9
posted on
04/30/2008 10:09:18 AM PDT
by
ElPatriota
(Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president and may be Huck?.. Naah :))
To: Man50D
They started out worse than that.
"The ANTI-IMMIGRATION" views of CNN...................."
propaganda technique, pure and simple.
To: BGHater
What the hell do the leftists who run the Guardian care about Mexicans sneaking illegally over our borders? Maybe they should do something to help their own country, if indeed they were capable of it.
11
posted on
04/30/2008 10:11:05 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Please pass the arugula.)
To: BGHater
So how do you say STFU in Mehican?
Some folks think the only opinions which are “allowed” are the ones they agree with.
Might work that way in Mehico ...if thats what you want, go there.
12
posted on
04/30/2008 10:16:29 AM PDT
by
Adder
(typical bitter white person)
To: BGHater
“Latino members of Congress”
Money tainted tools of the wage depression lobby, working hard for amnesties that will disproportionately harm the economics of Latino American citizens.
13
posted on
04/30/2008 10:38:30 AM PDT
by
Shermy
(Nightmares From My Pastor, A Story of Race and Insanity)
To: BGHater
populist outbursts against undocumented immigrants, whom he calls "aliens" The Guardian? No bias in this "objective" reporting! What a propaganda rag...Is this "paper" an arm of the globalist movement?
14
posted on
04/30/2008 10:58:01 AM PDT
by
Edgerunner
(At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
To: BGHater
What about the First Amendment? This so called representative of the people needs to understand that HE IS NOT ALLOWED TO IMPINGE ON SOMEONE FREE SPEECH. He is just a Stalinist.
15
posted on
04/30/2008 11:03:21 AM PDT
by
Exton1
To: Adder
So how do you say STFU in Mehican?CTChB
16
posted on
04/30/2008 11:17:55 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: BGHater; All
The only way these new age ‘latino’ leaders will ever be happy is if we just give them everything....our right to free speech, security, education, health care, our sovereignty.....they’re doing the best they can to destroy it all. They seem to think they’re the only ones entitled to any thing. I think it’s racism in it’s worst form. They don’t think the rest of us are pure enough to have the rights they should have.
I don’t care if you like Lou Dobbs or not, raise a stink about this nonsense!
17
posted on
04/30/2008 11:25:47 AM PDT
by
AuntB
('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
To: jack_napier; HiJinx; gubamyster; Virginia Ridgerunner; texastoo; jan in Colorado; wolfcreek; ...
“Anyone who would silence someone who has opinions they find offensive and disagreeable, should be considered a traitor for trying to undermine the First Amendment. Anyone who does so is not fit to serve this country in any capacity.”
Exactly, thank you for saying it better than I did while I was spitting nails!
18
posted on
04/30/2008 11:29:20 AM PDT
by
AuntB
('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
To: BGHater
Latino members of Congress condemned the TV network for failing to recognise the “potentially dangerous” consequences of Dobbs’s “divisive commentary”.....
“Latino members of Congress” and their radicalism, just friggin lovely!....Goodbye America!
To: AuntB
20
posted on
04/30/2008 12:25:43 PM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson