Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallegly: Time to drill in ANWR
Ventura County Star ^ | April 29, 2008 | Elton Gallegly

Posted on 04/29/2008 8:56:27 AM PDT by Signalman

Here's what the leaders of the congressional Democrats told the American people two years ago to persuade voters to bring them to power:

— "Democrats have a common-sense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas prices." (Nancy Pelosi, now speaker of the House).

— "Democrats believe that we can do more for the American people who are struggling to deal with high gas prices." (Steny Hoyer, now House majority leader).

— "House Democrats have a plan to help curb rising gas prices." (Jim Clyburn, now House majority whip).

When Pelosi was sworn in as speaker, the national average price for a gallon of regular gas was $2.29. As of Monday, the national average price for a gallon of gas was $3.60 — a record high. In California — where you, I and Speaker Pelosi live — a gallon of regular gas hit an average of $4 a gallon in San Francisco on Sunday, with the rest of the state not far behind.

So much for the Democrats' plan.

Gasoline prices are not, and shouldn't be, a partisan issue. They affect all Americans equally. That's because 98 percent of American transportation is fueled by oil. As transportation costs rise, so do costs for food, furniture, medicines, household supplies, clothing — anything that has to be shipped from one point to another.

Together, Democrats and Republicans need to cut our reliance on foreign oil, through conservation, alternative fuels and tapping domestic sources. The U.S. currently imports more than 56 percent of its oil from foreign countries, such as the volatile Middle East and Venezuela. At the current rate of importation and consumption, the U.S. will rely on the rest of the world for 64 percent of its oil needs in 12 years.

Conservation has an immediate impact, but is only part of the solution. Alternative fuels will take time and even then may not fully replace oil for all our energy needs. Therefore, if we are to reduce our reliance on foreign supplies, we must produce more domestic oil.

Flash back 28 years, when President Carter — a proud Democrat — set aside a small portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for "exploration and development" of oil and natural gas resources. An estimated 10.4 billion barrels of recoverable oil lies beneath its frozen tundra.

It's important to note that ANWR is not the California coast. There is no tourism industry in ANWR, which lies entirely north of the Arctic Circle. Except for the 220 natives living at Kaktovik, who support oil production, ANWR is desolate. That's important to note from a states' rights perspective. If we are to continue the moratorium on oil extraction off the California coast because it's opposed by most Californians, then we should equally take into consideration the views of Alaskans, who overwhelmingly support oil extraction in their state.

We should also note that the 19 million-acre refuge is more than three times the size of Massachusetts, yet fewer than 2,000 acres of the Coastal Plain would be impacted by oil production.

Note, too, that moving oil from Alaska is less risky than shipping it halfway around the world in a rusty Panamanian tanker.

A small impact on a barren piece of Alaska where the people support oil production would have a large impact on our nation's energy supply. Yet, nearly 30 years after a Democratic president opened the area, congressional Democrats are blocking it.

Opening ANWR needs to become part of the energy plan if America is to realize any relief.

In the meantime, another short-term solution would be for California to lower the sales tax on gasoline.

The 6 percent California sales tax on a gallon of gas when Pelosi became House speaker yielded the state about 13 cents per gallon. Today, the state receives more than 21 cents in sales taxes per gallon, a 62 percent windfall in 15 months. I should note that the sales tax is based on the cost of gasoline, plus the added federal and state excise taxes. Basically, the sales tax includes taxes on taxes. Furthermore, Elizabeth Hill, California's legislative analyst, wants to increase California's excise tax by 10 cents and make it a percentage of the cost of gasoline, thereby exponentially increasing the taxation on taxes.

Raising gas taxes is not the way to ease the state's deficit. More likely — because transportation costs affect every aspect of the economy — higher gas taxes will further weaken the economy and worsen the state's deficit.

Instead, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger should cut the sales tax on gasoline while long-term solutions, such as opening ANWR and fully implementing workable alternative energies, are achieved.

Californians shouldn't be gouged by a government that is reaping a windfall on its sales tax or a Congress that won't increase supplies.

— Elton Gallegly, R-Simi Valley, represents the 24th Congressional District.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 110th; anwr; drilling; energy; energyplan; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Bobkk47

The irony is thick. We always hear the left scream bloody murder over the loss of manufacturing jobs, yet they won’t let domestic oil companies drill for oil on/in US soils/seas.


21 posted on 04/29/2008 9:38:43 AM PDT by Go Gordon (The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush
If the GOP were smart, they’d be hitting the jackasses right between the eyes with this...

President Bush did just that this morning in his news conference.
The silence was deafening.
22 posted on 04/29/2008 9:39:37 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I wish we could throw them all out and start over with Reps that have a brain.

We can. Use the D.R.I.P. policy:

D on't

R e-elect

I ncumbent

P oliticians

23 posted on 04/29/2008 9:41:46 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

The nutless wonders in congress will never allow it. Mark my words, this nation will be brought to its knees before congress critters allow drilling there.


24 posted on 04/29/2008 9:44:08 AM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Why won’t President Bush sign the executive order?

Because he cannot find his spine.

25 posted on 04/29/2008 9:44:21 AM PDT by meyer (Still conservative, no longer Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
The GOP nominee is against drilling in ANWAR. He says it’s ‘pristine’ and shouldn’t be destroyed....

I know...I've made a point so many times, I've decided to put it in my tagline.

26 posted on 04/29/2008 9:56:02 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (Listening to this year's crop of presidential candidates makes me envy the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

For DemocRATs saying you have a plan and actually having a plan are two different things. Oh, THAT PLAN!


27 posted on 04/29/2008 9:59:52 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

We can. Use the D.R.I.P. policy:

We are too stupid for such.

We honestly deserve the politicians and problems we have.


28 posted on 04/29/2008 9:59:58 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Is the purpose of the 2nd amendment to brag at gun shows and chat rooms?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

People...you have to realize...our Congress critters don’t give a rat’s *ss about everyday Americans...The people we’ve elected time and time and time again to their cusshy little positions have become nothing more than “professional politicians” whose only concern and worry in the world is getting re-elected...As soon as one election is over, they are campaigning for the next...they lie and smile and tell you what they think you want to hear, then go about doing what they do best... take care of each other...you mean nothing to them but for one day every two to four years...election day....

Vote OUT the incumbents and tell the next batch to do something for the people or they are history also...

Our founders are retching in their graves at what we’ve allowed to happen to the system they gave us....

MAN UP!!!! Take back our country....


29 posted on 04/29/2008 10:04:53 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

The time to drill ANWR was 10 years ago.


30 posted on 04/29/2008 10:06:22 AM PDT by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Shut the deuce up!!! I'll do the fighting!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

The GOP nominee is against drilling in ANWAR. He says it’s ‘pristine’ and shouldn’t be destroyed....

Use “Google Earth” and go take a look at this “pristine” area....If rock, sand, ice and snow are “pristine” then that’s it...Oh, in the “summer” there is short grasses...


31 posted on 04/29/2008 10:08:13 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boonie

oh, Boonie, I get it. It’s McCain who doesn’t.


32 posted on 04/29/2008 10:09:40 AM PDT by AuntB ('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
I have said this many times and will continue to say this to anyone who will listen. There is no longer any easy way out of the mess we have created with our energy policy:

Bio-Fuels- NO! Unless we can made cellulosic ethanol work with bio material NOT used for food.
CTL (coal-to-liquid) - YES! We are going to have to do this anyway so why not get started now.
GTL (gas-to-liquid) YES! Same as CTL above.
NUCLEAR- YES! YES! YES! We need a ambitious program NOW! This is far and away the most important thing we can now do!
SOLAR- YES, if it can survive without subsidies.
WIND- YES (see SOLAR above).
CONSERVATION- Yes within limits. Most people are already conserving as much as they can. We have already picked the fruit from the low branches of the tree on conservation. When the vast majority of people purchase their next vehicle it will probably be one which gets very good gas mileage.
POLITICAL/LEADERSHIP- Please stop listening to movie stars, the Sierra Club, Al Gore and other assorted idiots on the issue of energy. Do not listen to political leaders from corn growing states. Listen to good scientists and engineers who have a background in energy.

33 posted on 04/29/2008 10:13:10 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

I ran across this article today explaining how Alaska plans to force drilling in ANWR.

http://www.adn.com/money/story/389829.html

Oil production from Sourdough wells might impel feds to lease in ANWR
ADJACENT: Reservoir seems to extend beneath the refuge.


34 posted on 04/29/2008 10:15:28 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
A previous post suggested that we stop the designer blends of gasoline and go with just 87& 90 Oct. in this country.
I would like to add, give Halliburton a fixed fee contract to put gasoline and diesel fuel the AMERICAN market. These guys can get it done.
35 posted on 04/29/2008 10:16:12 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulf BeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

This guy needs to be running the Republican Party, instead of the pantywaist RINOs of the past 10 years.


36 posted on 04/29/2008 10:18:10 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

Going to take more than just ANWR. Oil is a global commodity and right now it will take something like 1 million BPD to push prices down. Probably be several million BPD before we could get the first well online even if an executive order was signed today.


37 posted on 04/29/2008 10:18:42 AM PDT by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Post 8. Are you sure, write to him, I did.
38 posted on 04/29/2008 10:19:02 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulf BeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

This all makes sense, but does nothing to create a hold over the people by the politicians so don’t hold your breath for any of it to take place...

If it’s good for the people, but does nothing for the politician, it won’t be done...


39 posted on 04/29/2008 10:21:41 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
President Bush did just that this morning in his news conference. The silence was deafening.

What news conference? The press has not reported a word about it so how could he have had a news conference. Surely you have this mixed up with a shark bite.(Off Sark)

40 posted on 04/29/2008 10:23:46 AM PDT by River_Wrangler (Nothing difficult is ever easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson