>>Life must exist already for evolution to occur.<<
I agree. So you don’t think that Stein’s question was a challenge to abiogenesis and the arrogance of some materialists?
If Stein’s premise is that because science doesn’t really understand life (which I think is true), evolution must be totally false, then I think he is wrong about that.
I believe Stein's premise was the lack "free speech" in the science classroom. Which is laughably ridiculous, as well harmful. That's the problem.