[Shryke]

So you don’t think that Stein’s question was a challenge to abiogenesis and the arrogance of some materialists?

I believe Stein's premise was the lack "free speech" in the science classroom. Which is laughably ridiculous, as well harmful. That's the problem.

[cookcounty]

"I believe Stein's premise was the lack "free speech" in the science classroom. Which is laughably ridiculous, as well harmful. That's the problem."

Have you been to any college classes lately?

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

>>I believe Stein’s premise was the lack “free speech” in the science classroom.<<

That seems to be at least one of the major themes of the movie from what I have heard, but I thought one of the messages of the commercial, at least, was to challenge those scientists and academics who think of life as no more than a certain arrangement of matter. That’s just my subjective take.

I believe that science is one of the glories of Western civilization. I am grateful to it for its many useful results. I want scientists to continue their work, as long as they don’t harm living things. I don’t want religious dogma to substitute for science, even if I believe that dogma.

What I find disturbing is the arrogance of some scientists and their ideological allies who pretend that they really understand life.

[tpanther]

I used to think it was ridiculous too, then, things happened I could see first hand like “Christmas” disappeared from the school calendar here with no explanation, later found out the Georgia ACLU threatened legal action, and predictably, like a tent the NEA types folded, partly because these liberal lunatic secularists don’t have a problem with it and subsequent censorship; of all things Christian particularly.

There are hundreds if not thousands of examples and science class is HARDLY excluded!