Posted on 04/27/2008 7:27:54 AM PDT by kingattax
MSNBC's Dan Abrams and the folks in the liberal blogosphere are going to be very disappointed tomorrow when they witness what Chris Wallace says was "a very friendly exchange" between the "Fox News Sunday" host and Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama.
In fact, despite what Talking Points Memo reported Friday concerning Obama doing the program to "take on Fox," as well as Jonathan Kim's ("Fox Attacks") recommendation on MSNBC's "Verdict" that the junior senator from Illinois should "[go] on and just [attack] them," it appears Chris and Barack had an exceedingly civil and informative discussion about the campaign and the issues facing the nation.
Imagine that.
As he was driving home from his meeting with Obama, Wallace called in to give a preview of the interview to FNC's "Weekend Live"
It was a wide-ranging interview. We talked about Gen. Petraeus, who the president just named the head of Central Command. He made a very sharp attack on John McCain's economic policy. We talked some politics, the problems he's had reaching out to white, working-class voters, Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers. And we also talked about Hillary Clinton's challenge for another debate before North Carolina and Indiana in a little more than two weeks. [...]
It was a very friendly exchange. I think we asked him the questions that Fox viewers want to hear, and I think they'll be interested in his answers. But, he very much, clearly wants to reach out to the kind of moderate to conservative Democrats and Republicans who watch Fox, and I think he's, as I say, very much wants to get away from any sense that he's a creature or a captive of the left. That was very clear throughout his, more than a half-hour that we sat down and talked to him. And I think, I get the impression he'll come back on Fox because there's millions of people who watch Fox.
In the end, this is exactly why folks like Abrams, Kim, and people in the liberal blogosphere don't want their candidates on Fox.
After all, since Wallace is indeed one of the best interviewers on television today, the extreme left just can't abide the possibility their candidates will come across better on Fox than on networks whose political leanings are more like their own.
And, they certainly don't want their candidates doing anything that might be construed as moving to the center. Just ask Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller.
That said, it's going to be fascinating to see how the Netroots and their idols on MSNBC respond to what looks like is another in a seemingless endless litany of fair and balanced interviews on "Fox News Sunday."
Stay tuned.
Sorry Barack Hussein Obama...that do won't hunt. Your own associations make the truth clear.
Unless of course we are referring to the media's idea of the political center — that “center” accepts (indeed demands) redistribution of wealth and repressive regulations as ordinary functions of government.
Great graphic! Although I know conservatives would never vote for Obama, I think it’s great that he appeared on Fox and we can use the screenshots at counter-protests, as all ‘rats like to show up with Faux News banners and such. Now we have their candidate legitimizing Fox News. Maybe our own sign with “Faux News? Faux Candidate”
We’ll see in about 20 minutes.
I haven’t heard any whining from the Obama camp, which suggests Chris didn’t ask any tough follow-up questions.
Noel Sheppard you make me puke.
1 Then Elihu said:
2 "Hear my words, you wise men; listen to me, you men of learning.
3 For the ear tests words as the tongue tastes food.
4 Let us discern for ourselves what is right; let us learn together what is good.
5 "Job says, 'I am innocent, but God denies me justice.
6 Although I am right, I am considered a liar; although I am guiltless, his arrow inflicts an incurable wound.'
7 What man is like Job, who drinks scorn like water?
8 He keeps company with evildoers; he associates with wicked men. 9 For he says, 'It profits a man nothing when he tries to please God.'
10 "So listen to me, you men of understanding. Far be it from God to do evil, from the Almighty to do wrong.
11 He repays a man for what he has done; he brings upon him what his conduct deserves.
12 It is unthinkable that God would do wrong, that the Almighty would pervert justice.
13 Who appointed him over the earth? Who put him in charge of the whole world?
14 If it were his intention and he withdrew his spirit [a] and breath,
15 all mankind would perish together and man would return to the dust.
16 "If you have understanding, hear this;
listen to what I say. 17 Can he who hates justice govern? Will you condemn the just and mighty One?
18 Is he not the One who says to kings, 'You are worthless,' and to nobles, 'You are wicked,'
19 who shows no partiality to princes and does not favor the rich over the poor, for they are all the work of his hands?
20 They die in an instant, in the middle of the night; the people are shaken and they pass away; the mighty are removed without human hand.
21 "His eyes are on the ways of men; he sees their every step.
22 There is no dark place, no deep shadow, where evildoers can hide.
23 God has no need to examine men further, that they should come before him for judgment.
24 Without inquiry he shatters the mighty and sets up others in their place.
25 Because he takes note of their deeds, he overthrows them in the night and they are crushed.
26 He punishes them for their wickedness where everyone can see them,
27 because they turned from following him and had no regard for any of his ways.
28 They caused the cry of the poor to come before him, so that he heard the cry of the needy.
29 But if he remains silent, who can condemn him? If he hides his face, who can see him? Yet he is over man and nation alike,
30 to keep a godless man from ruling, from laying snares for the people.
31 "Suppose a man says to God, 'I am guilty but will offend no more.
32 Teach me what I cannot see; if I have done wrong, I will not do so again.'
33 Should God then reward you on your terms, when you refuse to repent? You must decide, not I; so tell me what you know.
34 "Men of understanding declare, wise men who hear me say to me,
35 'Job speaks without knowledge; his words lack insight.'
36 Oh, that Job might be tested to the utmost for answering like a wicked man!
37 To his sin he adds rebellion; scornfully he claps his hands among us and multiplies his words against God."
Obama's friends make themselves rich on the fears of the poor. These men will have to face their God and explain how they used HIM.
i can’t find much to like about chris wallace either
Did anyone catch the drift from Obama regarding the question of whether or not he will accept public money for his campaign in the general election? He said he would if he and McCain came to an understanding that ads from organizations like the swift boat vets and the RNC be prohibited. Did I hear a call for censorship in the election or is it just me?
cockroaches hate it when the lights (truth) get turned on.
The wife is watching this “interview” as I type this. What a load of crap! Did BHO give a list of questions to be asked beforehand? Or is Chris Wallace just that much of a weenie?
Obama, though, runs with a rough crowd ~ folks who'd turn America into a Gulag where they'd butcher the meek, the innocent, those weeking a better future.
If Obama had only taken in Newt Gingrich as his principle advisor he could have been the next President.
Scum of a feather flock together.
Obama invited his opponent to join him in violating the campaign finance laws.
Which, as it turns out, seems to me to be an excellent idea. Everybody start breaking those laws, particularly while the FEC doesn't have enough members to hold a meeting, and maybe we can get rid of those oppressive, even fascist laws in one fell swoop. No way the FEC is going to get around to ruling against the next President eh?!
I seem to remember Chris Wallace chiding the “Fox and Friends” cast about their tough coverage of Jeremiah Wright. Chris is as liberal as his old man is.
Legitimizing with whom?
chris w. jumped on Steve Doocey and the others on fox and friends, because he thought they were being to hard on obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.