1 posted on
04/26/2008 6:31:55 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: blam
The conservative columnist David Brooks, once an admirer, complained that he has morphed into "a more conventional politician", guilty of "the sorts of fibs, evasions and hypocrisies that are the stuff of conventional politics". Obama hasn't morphed into anything, he is merely showing his true nature now that things are not going his way. How dare the media, or anyone, actually ask hard questions about his beliefs and his intentions and those of his associates. Why, to hear him and his crew(and to what should be his great shame, McCain)tell it, telling the truth is dirty politics.
2 posted on
04/26/2008 6:35:54 PM PDT by
calex59
To: All
Ooops... The “bitterness,” is pouring out?
Oh well :)
4 posted on
04/26/2008 6:37:10 PM PDT by
ElPatriota
(Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president and may be Huck?.. Naah :))
To: blam
Forget the popcorn,pass the grapefruit.
5 posted on
04/26/2008 6:38:24 PM PDT by
OeOeO
(Sic Transit Gloria Mundi... Gloria get me a beer,and hurry..)
To: blam
"...and in so doing has left critics wondering whether he is not just another conventional politician grubbing for votes."You wonder???
Hahahahahaha! Oh, Tim, you are so naive--such a fool!
7 posted on
04/26/2008 6:39:05 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
To: blam
"Seniors, listen up. I'm getting grey hair myself." My God, what a putz.
To: blam
Obama clinged to his church early on to snow people into believing he was some fine Christian. Then he tried to distance himself from the church. Seems he cannot make up his mind.
9 posted on
04/26/2008 6:40:03 PM PDT by
boycott
To: blam
Did he give another middle finger? Because there is nothing new or aggressive in the quotes in this article.
10 posted on
04/26/2008 6:41:51 PM PDT by
The_Republican
(Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
To: blam
The Democrats have come up with two unelectable candidates.
Obama's chances of being elected President are betweend zilch and zero.
Hillary might be electable--but only through election fraud.
11 posted on
04/26/2008 6:44:01 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
To: blam
On Iraq, a war he opposed from the start, he is blunter than ever. "I was right. Those who voted for it, like Hillary Clinton and John McCain, were wrong." If the Allies had invaded and occupied Germany after the violation rearmament provision of the Versailles Treaty in 1935 at a cost of 5,000 casualties and a long term occupation, an appeaser in 1940 would have claimed:
"I was right. Those who voted for it, like Winston Churchill, were wrong."
12 posted on
04/26/2008 6:45:53 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: blam
Five days after losing to Hillary Clinton in the Pennsylvania primary, Barack Obama has taken off the gloves in his battle to win the American presidencyFixed it.
To: blam
Now I have to rewatch that old Richard Harris film about Oliver Cromwell to understand the historical references.
15 posted on
04/26/2008 6:58:44 PM PDT by
Ciexyz
To: blam
“..left critics wondering whether he is not just another conventional politician grubbing for votes.”
Are there still people wondering if Obanana and Hitlery do not fit that description? Come to think of it, McCrazy is the third member of that trio.
18 posted on
04/26/2008 7:06:51 PM PDT by
353FMG
(Don't make the mistake to think that Government is a Friend of the People)
To: blam
Obama cannot take what has been inflicted on President Bush for eight straight years
19 posted on
04/26/2008 7:17:27 PM PDT by
Rooivalk
To: blam
The answer is, yes, he’s just another conventional politician grubbing for votes.
22 posted on
04/26/2008 7:30:14 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: blam
HOw do you tell when a candidate is losing an election.
The answer is the candidate that changes tactics and strategy during the campaign.
A winning candidate has no reason to change anything. If he or she is winning all their goals are being met.
But a candidate that is losing has to do something different in order to have a chance to win. The candidate that changes tactics is always losing.
To: blam
I hate everything that Hillary Clinton stands for, but you have to admire her determination and unwillingness to give up.
25 posted on
04/26/2008 7:46:17 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
To: blam
Hillary dont feel no ways tarred...she come too far from where she started...
29 posted on
04/26/2008 7:58:21 PM PDT by
TornadoAlley3
(Everytime McCain reaches out to conservatives, conservatives get poked in the eye.)
To: blam
"The answer is, yes, hes just another conventional politician grubbing for votes."
Hate to break the news - but all 3 of them are doing the same thing.
I'm no fan of any of them - but frankly - I like seeing Obama slapping the 'queen of entitlement' around. Hope he does more of it.
She likes to dish it out & then pulls the 'being picked on girl' when she gets it back.
31 posted on
04/26/2008 8:00:56 PM PDT by
LADY J
To: blam
Obama checks out the competition...
...from behind!
To: blam
It is time to give this Marxist impostor the Red Boating of his life.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson