Posted on 04/26/2008 3:23:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie
Most politicians have been swept up by the notion the U.S. could supply a good portion of its energy needs from Midwest farms, instead of from unfriendly regimes in the Middle East and elsewhere. In December, Congress overwhelmingly passed, and President Bush signed, a new energy bill dramatically raising renewable fuel mandates.
But that consensus will be open to debate in the presidential election with John McCain as the GOP standard bearer. Hes one of the few politicians who oppose handouts to the ethanol industry.
(Excerpt) Read more at epaper.investors.com ...
Correct. That’s why I put the word “free” in brackets.
1. We have 200 to 300 years of energy available in the form of shale oil and coal. These can be converted to useable liquid fuels and in particular diesel fuel. The environmental leftist block this.
2. We can supply every watt of electrical energy we need from nuclear power. The environmental leftist block this.
3. We have a great deal of oil that we can get on line from the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska if we can drill it. This oil can be brought on line quicker than the shale and coal. The environmental leftist block this.
The conversion of corn to ethanol is very inefficient and has a very marginal effect on our total energy consumption and has driven up the cost of basic foods and is thus starving and killing people in the third world. THE ENVIROMENTAL LEFTISTS SUPPORT THIS.
Global warming theory (The environmental leftist support this) is only a theory and the data of the last ten years says it is not true. The last ten years have shown the greatest percentage of increase in Co2 per year in the last 100 years or more. The global temperature has dropped in the last ten years.
The country that is the greatest user of coal and the largest polluter (if you think global warming is true) is a left wing country and a communist country called China. THE LEFT WING ENVIROMENTALIST SAY NOTHING ABOUT THIS. I wonder why? Actually I know why. The environmentalist movement is not a movement concerned with the environment but a political movement concerned with their political power.
Add 100 new nuclear power plants to the equation and we have a winner.
This alone could give McCain a huge lever toward the White House if he will play the Unintended Consequences of inexperienced lefties failing to think things through. Hopefully, no one will recall his blunders.
I like your ideas, though you left out drilling off-shore and ANWR.
Also, I’m a bit skeptical about your last point. I wouldn’t worry so much about speculators. I’d focus on increasing over-all supply.
McCain is talking some lately. Brain seems to be still functional, which is a positive sign.
Twilight Zone? Maybe. I’d call it the Pander Zone. Pander to the bias of the press. Pander to the latest leftist fad.
Hes one of the few politicians who oppose handouts to the ethanol industry.
At some price the ethanol industry should be able to stand on its own without major subsidy grants. I’d think the time is near or here with gasoline in the mid $3.50 gallon range and oil over $100 bbl and expected continue upward. Let the corn boys stand on their own.
But I have admired his principal in holding this position knowing the results for him.
Finally - someone posts exactly what I have been thinking!
BINGO!!!!!
And add to that....Increase the minimum margin requirements for commodity trading accounts to flush out the speculators and let the air out of the oil/corn/wheat/rice/soy/gold bubble.
Stop PAYING to set aside an area almost as large as available ag land in Kansas as “no till”.
Watch prices fall big time.
I agree with him on that, and I come from the middle of Illinois corn country.
That’s a pretty good list.
This is a note of sanity and a reason to vote for the bastard
No corn ethanol
AMEN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.