To: GMMAC; fanfan
2 posted on
04/24/2008 1:52:52 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
To: Dawnsblood
I had long ago given up on Maclean’s because of its hopeless left-wing bias but their fight with the HRC has won back my respect. I think I’ll start subscribing again.
3 posted on
04/24/2008 2:02:01 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
To: Dawnsblood
4 posted on
04/24/2008 2:11:23 PM PDT by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
To: Dawnsblood
History has shown us that hateful words sometimes lead to hurtful actions that undermine freedom and have led to unspeakable crimes. The ahistorical nitwits in trying to eliminate hate foment it and undermine freedom at the same time. The left never learns from the mistakes of the past.
6 posted on
04/24/2008 2:25:37 PM PDT by
eggman
(Democrat party - The black hole of liberalism from which no rational thought can escape.)
To: Dawnsblood; Rummyfan; kellynla; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; ..
Pinging the NEW Mark Steyn Ping List.
If you don't know, Steyn is being charged by the "Canadian Humans Rights" mob with "hate speech" for his comments on Islam.
Oh how once mighty Canada has fallen.

On or off, FReepmail or Ping me.
Cheers,
knewshound
knewshounds blog
7 posted on
04/24/2008 2:38:48 PM PDT by
knews_hound
(Democrats dilemma:Vote for a Nut with 2 boobs or a Boob with 2 nuts)
To: Dawnsblood
9 posted on
04/24/2008 3:08:27 PM PDT by
PeterFinn
(Charlton Heston & Ronald Reagan - my two favorite Presidents.)
To: Dawnsblood
It's not a left/right thing. It's not a gay/straight thing. It's not a Jew/Muslim thing. It's not a hateful Steyn/nice fluffy caring compassionate Canadian thing. It's a free/unfree thing. And the commissars are on the wrong side. It is easy to see what sort of speech (if any) results in violence by starting at the violence and working one's way back. One doesn't find many Steyn columns that way, and what one does find doesn't seem to be the subject of the New Censorship. One might start at the bombing of a bank, for example, and work one's way back to the foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric of the radical Left in the persons of Obama's friends Ayers and Dohrn. One might start at burning housing developments and vandalized equipment and find the rhetoric of Earth First and the ELF. One might start at suicide bombings of innocent civilians and find an insane rant in a mosque. Clearly if there is a link between "hate" speech and violence one would find it where there is both.
And just as clearly the speech this particular censor wants to regulate isn't on that list. Were she honest about the affair she'd be trying to censor those on it, not simply those she finds distasteful that are not. She isn't doing so, and she isn't honest.
To: Dawnsblood
They have this HRC crap in Canada, and they have it in England, If the Dems win everything in November we’ll have it here too.
11 posted on
04/24/2008 4:11:11 PM PDT by
Wil H
To: Dawnsblood; All
12 posted on
04/24/2008 4:18:20 PM PDT by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: Dawnsblood
Those last two paragraphs are pure gold:
I don't have as low an opinion of Canadians as Barbara Hall and Jennifer Lynch do. I don't believe your liberty is the conditional discretionary gift of hack bureaucrats advised by Marxist theorists. You defeat bad ideas whether Nazism, Marxism, jihadism, Steynism or Trudeaupian pseudo-"human rights" mumbo-jumbo in the bracing air and light of day, in vigorous open debate, not in the fetid corridors of power policed by ahistorical nitwits.
It's not a left/right thing. It's not a gay/straight thing. It's not a Jew/Muslim thing. It's not a hateful Steyn/nice fluffy caring compassionate Canadian thing. It's a free/unfree thing. And the commissars are on the wrong side.
Wow, that's gonna' leave a Mark Steyn.
14 posted on
04/24/2008 5:10:24 PM PDT by
SC Swamp Fox
(Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
To: Dawnsblood; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
17 posted on
04/24/2008 7:38:20 PM PDT by
Clive
To: Dawnsblood
I don't have as low an opinion of Canadians as Barbara Hall and Jennifer Lynch do. I don't believe your liberty is the conditional discretionary gift of hack bureaucrats advised by Marxist theorists. You defeat bad ideas whether Nazism, Marxism, jihadism, Steynism or Trudeaupian pseudo-"human rights" mumbo-jumbo in the bracing air and light of day, in vigorous open debate, not in the fetid corridors of power policed by ahistorical nitwits. Mark Steyn is a true treasure of the Western World.
And what the heck is going on in Canada?????
20 posted on
04/24/2008 11:26:13 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Dawnsblood
Of course. The act of not acting in an insufficiently non-hateful way can itself be hateful. Whether or not the incident is a non-incident is incidental.The master at work.
23 posted on
05/01/2008 1:57:50 PM PDT by
Dr.Deth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson