The fat lady is warming up her singing voice for Barack...
"Mi mi mi mi miiiiiii...."
:)
No, “you go girl”!
I want Hillary as the nominee. She is more easily beaten.
Rush is brilliant!
This is bunk. Negativity does work. PA Dems (and maybe a few crossovers) gave her a decisive victory. There was a record breaking number of primary voters. Voters weren't turned off, they came out in droves.
If voters are "tired of" Hillary's tactics, why did they hand her a 10-point victory on record turnout?
Says who?? This statement, in a nut shell, is why most of us simply loathe the NYTimes.
According to the NYTimes proclaims thatvoters are getting tired of this whole messy democratic election process and it all should come to a halt, right? Democracy, and the process is demeaning??? It does not work???
The poor sinking NYTimes, they never really did like this whole democratic election process to begin with, did they? They always had a soft spot for guys like Stalin, right?
Damn. Now I need a new irony meter.
“Voters are getting tired of it;”
Obama tells us how we feel, and now the NYT. Wish politicos and pundit would quit pretending to know what we think when in reality they are imposing on us what they WANT us to think. More like mind-reading than journalism.
OH, so true. I hope Rush leads today's show with that NYT editorial. There's no better proof of the astounding success of Opeation CHAOS.
10 points is “inconclusive”, according to the NY Times. Maybe they want a re-count of the hanging chads!
The fat lady is warming up her singing voice for Barack...
"Mi mi mi mi miiiiiii...."
:)
Which proves the point that the Gray Lady has become the Bag Lady of Relevance.
My intial reaction was that the worm had turned . . . . . until I realized that the NYT was remaining true to form - they support the more liberal candidate (who USED to be Hillary).
What’s annoying about the Times’ editorial is its psuedo high-mindedness. Hillary shouldn’t be “negative” about Obama. Well, why not? Liberals, and the Left in general, are negative all the time, irrationally so. But it’s not fair to raise “negatives” about your fellow liberal?
Its very funny. They all say that Obama is winning the popular vote. But he's not even close, let alone winning. They are giving him credit for the caucus wins at the same ratio as the actual votes. But a caucus is far from an actual vote. Look at Texas. Hillary wins the popular vote and looses the caucus. The reality is that she has won the popular vote hands down. He wins caucuses. Well the general election is not a caucus.
Obama has not won the popular vote. He will not win the general election. Besides that lack of ballots, he also has a huge problem with key states. He hasn't won any key states. If he can't when them within his own party he will have a hard time winning them in the general.
If Obama wins the nomination he absolutely needs her on the ticket to win, or he will lose big.
The NYT doesn’t have much use for free elections. Or even for semi-free elections, like they have in Philly...
Since when does anyone care what the NY Slimes says? I smell blood in the water....beat the crap out of him Hillary!
And then wrote another one that sounds grown-up.
HUH?? She won didn't she?....sheesh!! Throwing mud at your competitor will work! Take notes McVAIN!!