Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gray Lady demands Hillary be quiet and start losing
Hot Air ^ | 4/23/08 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 04/23/2008 4:47:28 AM PDT by Renfield

Even before the scope of Barack Obama’s loss became apparent in last night’s Pennsylvania primary, the New York Times editorial board published a screed attacking Hillary Clinton for remaining in the race. Called “The Low Road to Victory”, it demands an end to her campaign even while she handily wins major states. Actually, it’s not that they want her to quit, but that they want her to stop competing against Obama so hard — apparently conceding that Obama can’t win in a tough race:

The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.

Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election......

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: election; hillary; nyt; obama; operationchaos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Renfield

My intial reaction was that the worm had turned . . . . . until I realized that the NYT was remaining true to form - they support the more liberal candidate (who USED to be Hillary).


21 posted on 04/23/2008 5:47:00 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

What’s annoying about the Times’ editorial is its psuedo high-mindedness. Hillary shouldn’t be “negative” about Obama. Well, why not? Liberals, and the Left in general, are negative all the time, irrationally so. But it’s not fair to raise “negatives” about your fellow liberal?


22 posted on 04/23/2008 5:49:40 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Unapologetically European)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Hillary could still win the nomination only if something extremely damaging comes out about BaaRock.


23 posted on 04/23/2008 5:53:20 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

The Big Media prefers BaaRock over Hillary. She needs to pull a rabbit out of a hat to win the nomination!


24 posted on 04/23/2008 5:55:21 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

See my tag...


25 posted on 04/23/2008 6:00:20 AM PDT by steel_resolve (Operation Chaos is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I agree. Hillary would be a much more difficult foe for McCain. They would be fighting over the same swing voters. The poling numbers show more Hilary voters would abandon Obama in November than the other way around.

I want her to win everywhere but NC, that state can go Obama. That gives her just enough to stick around to August, but guarantees Obama is the candidate.

Hilary could win in November. Obama would lose if he ran against a dead dog.


26 posted on 04/23/2008 6:00:42 AM PDT by henkster (I'm a typical white guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird
The Big Media prefers BaaRock over Hillary. She needs to pull a rabbit out of a hat to win the nomination!

Well, after Pennsylvania she leads the popular vote. How's that for a rabbit?

27 posted on 04/23/2008 6:03:44 AM PDT by gridlock (Proud McCain Supporter since February 8, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
What a horrible mean article. It starts out being just plain mean. Then it tries to moderate. And they wrote this early in the evening last night. So they did not even wait to see the outcome. But their very premise is wrong. Obama is not in the lead.

Its very funny. They all say that Obama is winning the popular vote. But he's not even close, let alone winning. They are giving him credit for the caucus wins at the same ratio as the actual votes. But a caucus is far from an actual vote. Look at Texas. Hillary wins the popular vote and looses the caucus. The reality is that she has won the popular vote hands down. He wins caucuses. Well the general election is not a caucus.
Obama has not won the popular vote. He will not win the general election. Besides that lack of ballots, he also has a huge problem with key states. He hasn't won any key states. If he can't when them within his own party he will have a hard time winning them in the general.

If Obama wins the nomination he absolutely needs her on the ticket to win, or he will lose big.

28 posted on 04/23/2008 6:05:10 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
The poling numbers show more Hilary voters would abandon Obama in November than the other way around.

My Favorite Liberal says she will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee, but may vote Democrat if Mrs. Clinton is the nominee.

A sample of one, but My Favorite Liberal usually has a pretty good instinct about such things.

29 posted on 04/23/2008 6:07:52 AM PDT by gridlock (Proud McCain Supporter since February 8, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AdaGray
Moments ago, Laura Ingraham said on her radio show that she's ready to FedEx some crying towels to the NYT.

:)

30 posted on 04/23/2008 6:20:04 AM PDT by redstates4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"I want Hillary as the nominee. She is more easily beaten."


31 posted on 04/23/2008 6:21:08 AM PDT by redstates4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

The NYT doesn’t have much use for free elections. Or even for semi-free elections, like they have in Philly...


32 posted on 04/23/2008 6:29:51 AM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
OH, so true. I hope Rush leads today's show with that NYT editorial. There's no better proof of the astounding success of Opeation CHAOS

That is so true.
Divide and conquer, divide and conquer, it works.

33 posted on 04/23/2008 6:32:06 AM PDT by Big Horn (I am bitter, I just want to eat my waffle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Since when does anyone care what the NY Slimes says? I smell blood in the water....beat the crap out of him Hillary!


34 posted on 04/23/2008 6:33:03 AM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
The NYT bathhouse boys should have written this editorial, stuck it in a drawer to read in the morning.

And then wrote another one that sounds grown-up.

35 posted on 04/23/2008 6:42:18 AM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
"and it does not work."

HUH?? She won didn't she?....sheesh!! Throwing mud at your competitor will work! Take notes McVAIN!!

36 posted on 04/23/2008 6:46:41 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
What the Neanderthals at the New York Times lack the wit to grasp is that they're talking about the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled, tiresome, heavily negative Democrat Party that demeans everything of value.
37 posted on 04/23/2008 6:59:05 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

OK—we’re in synch. Now, riddle me this: Is it time for Operation Chaos to begin voting for BHO in the primaries?


38 posted on 04/23/2008 7:22:47 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Vote Obama in NC, vote Hilary every where else. We need Hilary close enough to stay in, but too far away to steal the nomination.


39 posted on 04/23/2008 8:37:49 AM PDT by henkster (I'm a typical white guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
The Old Grey Lady is scared spitless that this imbroglio among the Democrats will have undecideds start looking more closely at John McCain, and liking what they see.
40 posted on 04/23/2008 9:36:18 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson