Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Plan for NASA
American Thinker ^ | April 22, 2008 | Lee Cary

Posted on 04/22/2008 10:41:30 AM PDT by RDTF

As the legend goes, when the Spanish conquistador Hernando Cortez landed in what is now Mexico in 1519, he ordered the boats that brought him and his men there to be burned. Obama seems to have something similar planned for NASA.

Although the MSM has largely ignored Barack Obama's plans for NASA, the issue is likely to bubble up during the general election campaign, if he's the Democratic nominee. Here's why.

There's a potential confluence of two events - one possible and one planned: an Obama presidency and a mission shift already underway at NASA.

The Space Shuttle program will end in 2010. The Constellation program is not scheduled to begin manned flights until 2015. Meanwhile, NASA faces dramatic job reductions among its 21,000 labor force at the close of the Shuttle Program. For example, the Kennedy Space Center at Cape Canaveral, FL faces a cut of 8,000 contractor jobs. The Michoud Assembly Facility near New Orleans could lose 1,300 of its 1,900 jobs.

-snip-

Cortez, according to the story, burned his boats to force his men to move inland with no option of going back. The Shuttle program is, metaphorically, like Cortez's boats. After 2010, the Shuttles are gone. The Constellation project will provide the vehicles for the next big step in space exploration. That is unless Barack Obama becomes our 44th president.

-snip-

Something interesting happens in the Obama campaign document entitled "Barack Obama's Plan For American Leadership in Space." The "something" is that there's nothing in there about "American leadership in space." It states,

"As president, Obama will support the development of this vital new platform [CEV] to ensure that the United States' reliance on foreign space capabilities is limited to the minimum possible time period."

Translated into English, that means that he'll maintain the Constellation project at a minimum $500 million per year budget as the band takes an extended break between sets, taking their instruments with them. And for how long does the U.S. postpone a new space transport capability? Obama's answer is the "minimum possible time period." (Now is that in human or dog years?)

In the meantime, the U.S. space program sits on the tarmac. This will free-up funding for his aggressive plans to federalize pre-school. (For one non-MSM explanation of what that's about read here.) Note that the final three paragraphs of Obama space plan are not about space exploration at all. They're about his education plan wherein he will:

Recruit High-Quality Math and Science Teachers Enhance Science Instruction Improve and Prioritize Science Assessments

Back to the Cortez analogy. The space boats are being burned on schedule as the Shuttle program phases out. The way forward is on the Ares 1 rocket and the CEV - Cortez's guns and horses. But Capitan Hernando Obama says, "Men, let's keep the guns clean and the powder dry, but not feed the horses for five years while we sit here on the beach and hope."

In the meantime what happens to NASA's cadre of scientists for five years? The answer is they move on because putting the Constellation Program on hold for five years is tantamount to killing it. (Would you want your dentist to perform a root canal on you after she returns from a five year sabbatical as a lifeguard in Tahiti?) Those scientists that can, retire. Many of those that cannot retire find jobs elsewhere - maybe teaching High School math for Obama, or working in China's space program. Then, at some indefinite "minimum" time down the road, the U.S. space program restarts and they come back. Or not.

In the meantime, how do our astronauts get to the International Space Station? Simple, they hitch rides on Russian space craft until the Chinese enter the space transport competition.

USA Today quoted Obama's perspective on the space program.

"We're not going to have the engineers and the scientists to continue space exploration if we don't have kids who are able to read, write and compute."

By the same logic, we should also suspend medical research grants and close down the National Institute of Health because we're not going to have physicians and biologists if we don't have kids who are able to read, write and compute. Yes?

During the Q. & A. session at a campaign stop in Wyoming, Obama was asked about the nation's space program. Here's a revealing account of his response written by Greg Zsidisin, the person who asked Obama "Why are you specifically pitting the space program against education, and where's the vision in shutting down the [human] space program?

"‘I grew up on Star Trek,' Obama said. ‘I believe in the final frontier.' (Huh?)

"But Obama said he does not agree with the way the space program is now being run and thinks funding should be trimmed until the mission is clearer. (It's actually much clear than his intentions toward Iran and nuclear weapon.)

"‘NASA has lost focus and is no longer associated with inspiration,' he said. ‘I don't think our kids are watching the space shuttle launches. It used to be a remarkable thing. It doesn't even pass for news anymore.' (Neither do heart transplants. So...should we stop them?)

"Obama seemed to resent my question. A little later, he addressed another on energy, and spoke of the need for an alternative energy effort. He concluded by turning to my direction and saying pointedly, ‘And that, sir, is what our next Apollo Program should be.'"

So there it is. The Global Social Worker aims to shift funds from space exploration to federal pre-schools. Or is it to an alternative fuel? Hard to figure.

All this suggests the most poignant irony of this entire campaign season.

Barack Obama, the candidate who has often been portrayed by some in the media as Kennedyesque, would leave the space exploration legacy of JFK sitting idle on the beach. Watching the boats burn.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ludite; nasa; obama2008; science; shuttle; socialism; space; starkravingsocialist; ussa; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2008 10:42:04 AM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDTF

“”We’re not going to have the engineers and the scientists to continue space exploration if we don’t have kids who are able to read, write and compute.””

Wow, I actually agree with Obama on something....hope it passes soon. :)


2 posted on 04/22/2008 10:44:38 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Has anyone noticed Hussein is the first candidate since FDR that smokes. How smart is the guy to not realize the associated health issues? Also note the media makes no mention of his tobacco addiction.


3 posted on 04/22/2008 10:46:13 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Obama wants to be sure that the Chinese control the high ground of space before we do.


4 posted on 04/22/2008 10:49:56 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
" Here's a revealing account of his response written by Greg Zsidisin, the person who asked Obama "Why are you specifically pitting the space program against education, and where's the vision in shutting down the [human] space program?

"‘I grew up on Star Trek,' Obama said. ‘I believe in the final frontier.' (Huh?)

Yet another example of the empty suit that is Barry (Barack) Obama

"But Obama said he does not agree with the way the space program is now being run and thinks funding should be trimmed until the mission is clearer. (It's actually much clear than his intentions toward Iran and nuclear weapon.) "

Hint...the mission will never be clarified and therefore funding will never be restored.

5 posted on 04/22/2008 10:52:38 AM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

yea, it would be nice to get rid of NASA, funny, this author thinks conservatives are going to be critical of him for this his lack of funding expansion?


6 posted on 04/22/2008 10:53:56 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Once we shut the shuttle program down, we are completely at the mercy of the Russians. A five year gap or maybe much longer will end any thought of new major funding for manned space flight. The needs of welfare, schools, entitlements of endless nature, etc. will always call louder than the needs for a program that may produce a craft some years in the future.
7 posted on 04/22/2008 10:54:31 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

The Chinese will be on the Moon, Japan will have a permanent orbital station building a Mars mission, India wil be the goto country for sat launches, and we’ll have change. And hope.


8 posted on 04/22/2008 10:56:22 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
McCain swears like the former sailor err pilot that he was, Hillary drinks (and shoots ducks!!), big whoop.

In regards to the article...NASA got in trouble when a lot of the people who came on board in the '60s (many for Apollo) started to retire in the '90s - you had a lot of institutional knowledge that was lost. I'm not going to rehash some of the safety issues that arose (since there are other threads about it those issues) but right now we have a lot of the management types who came on in the late 70s/early 80s with the Shuttle program, and the style of engineering they were used to differed dramatically from the Apollo (and older) days, and the same will hold true with the CEV, no matter when it comes online - CEV is a much more simplified system, much more modular (both of which are good attributes in my book, unlike the Shuttle which was a jack of all trades, master of none and which was not capable of being scaled up or down in regards to the mission at hand).

That said, I think that everything Obama and the others talk about in regards to math and science education and getting kids interested is going to be overshadowed by commercial space ventures. I think when they start their sub-orbital shots later this year, and then move to orbital tourism, I think you'll see the interest began to grow quite a bit.

We have to do something though - where we were once a nation of pioneers, we are now a nation of settlers, and it's reflected in our society.
9 posted on 04/22/2008 10:58:24 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

1. This article only addresses the manned program which is wasted money. The unmanned program produces all the science.

2. The Atlas V will be man rated and meet all NASA safety criteria long before 2015.

3. The Ares is in trouble and may not even be viable.

4. If Obama allowed the manned program at NASA die it would be the best thing that could happen to NASA.


10 posted on 04/22/2008 11:02:51 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I wouldn’t expect Hussein to support NASA since he hasn’t a clue as to what science and engineering are about—the guy is nothing but a cheesy, cheap, race-baiting, politician lawyer seeking to lord it over whitey.

An occasional drink and swearing don’t have near the detrimental effect on healthcare that people that smoke or practice homosexual behavior or use IV drugs.


11 posted on 04/22/2008 11:03:20 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Also note the media makes no mention of his tobacco addiction.

Perhaps because cigarettes are a legal product and it is no big deal?

12 posted on 04/22/2008 11:04:14 AM PDT by Eaker (Well, it just seemed wrong to cheat on an ethics test. -- Calvin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Well, if money was diverted from BS science and math such as global climate change to real math and science programs we might find that we have students interested in science and math.

One of the key motivators during the 50s and 60s for kids to go into math and science was the space program — initiated by a GOP administration and hijacked as their own by a corrupt pair of democrats.


13 posted on 04/22/2008 11:04:23 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Possible scifi list ping?


14 posted on 04/22/2008 11:05:55 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

If Barack Hussein Obama were to become president of the United States, his plans for NASA would be the least of our worries.


15 posted on 04/22/2008 11:07:47 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Has anyone noticed Hussein is the first candidate since FDR that smokes. How smart is the guy to not realize the associated health issues? Also note the media makes no mention of his tobacco addiction.

He quit that is why. Isn’t it a freedom of choice question. I can’t stand Obama, but let’s not get carried away with your liberalism. No I don’t smoke, but feel that people can if they want without the smoking police always saying snide remarks.


16 posted on 04/22/2008 11:09:23 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Gil Scott-Heron had a song about this back in 1970 I think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5smPcN8AoE


17 posted on 04/22/2008 11:10:01 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Day one of the Obama Administration: Executive order authorizing unionization of 200,000 TSA employees (those wizards who make you take off your shoes at the airport). This is another bone to throw to his buddies at the Gov’t Unions - 18 billion of pre-K education is a GIFT to the teachers unions.


18 posted on 04/22/2008 11:17:05 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Report: Soyuz crew was in serious danger during descent
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2005317/posts


19 posted on 04/22/2008 11:19:21 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Ya....government math programs, where 1 + 1 = 3, and government “science” programs, aimed at inventing data to support preconceived social programs.


20 posted on 04/22/2008 11:21:45 AM PDT by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson