Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naval officer chooses discharge rather than go to Iraq (Watada case mentioned)
Seattle PI ^ | April 18, 2008 | Mike Barber

Posted on 04/18/2008 8:35:51 PM PDT by jazusamo

EVERETT -- Eleven years ago, Sabrina M. Weiner graduated as a valedictorian at Kamiak High School near Everett. She was a National Merit Scholar, aiming for a bright future after earning a Navy ROTC scholarship to Stanford University.

Two months ago, Weiner, 27, after seven years in the active and reserve duty during which she rose to the rank of lieutenant, forfeited her career.

In a rare instance involving a commissioned officer, Weiner was arrested and given a choice between a court-martial or less-than-honorable discharge after refusing to serve in Iraq.

Speaking publicly for the first time about it, Weiner says she was not against the war but the so-called "individual augmentee" program. In the past several years, that program has sent nearly 60,000 sailors from ships and bases to augment Army and Marine ground forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. "It is not an against-the-war argument but a people-accountability argument," Weiner says. "I was proud to say I was a Navy officer. My problem is the way they are using us as IAs. It minimizes the job and training we do for the Navy."

It cannibalizes the Navy -- and Air Force -- to cover up a shortage of Army and Marine troops to fight the wars, she argues.

For her convictions, she was thrown in jail, flown across the nation in shackles and threatened with court-martial. Today she is scraping by in Everett, living frugally, tutoring high school kids in math and is enrolled in graduate studies at the Alden March Bioethics Institute based at the Albany Medical College in New York.

"I'm not another Watada," she cautions, referring to the Fort Lewis Army active duty lieutenant, Ehren Watada. In 2006, Watada refused to accompany his Stryker Brigade to combat duty in Iraq, contending that the war is immoral and unconstitutional.

Unlike Watada, whose case remains active after moving from a military to a federal court last year, Weiner's was resolved within a month in February. And unlike the Army lieutenant, Weiner has not become an anti-war cause for Hollywood celebrities and peace activists.

Navy officials declined to discuss Weiner's case, saying they were unfamiliar with it.

According to the Navy Department, 7,063 active and 5,050 reserve sailors are serving as individual augmentees, not only in Iraq and Afghanistan but also in the Horn of Africa and other locations. They include 3,145 active-duty and reserve officers and more than 9,000 active-duty and reserve enlisted men and women. The Defense Department and top Navy officials have acknowledged that the policy has created hardships for sailors and their families. The Navy has altered the program after listening to complaints from sailors, and invites more input, though it says the program is needed and will remain in place for some time to come.

Assignments are voluntary and involuntary, and reviews from sailors are mixed. Active- and reserve-duty sailors, who declined to be named, cited problems with the program to the Seattle P-I. They included a ship driver from San Diego, a sailor from Eastern Washington and a Navy aviator.

The aviator contacted his congressman after he was involuntarily sent to serve with ground forces in Iraq only a few months after returning from a full deployment with his squadron flying support missions in the war zone.

The individual augmentee jobs typically include public works and reconstruction; training local forces in Afghanistan; medical care; protecting U.S. bases; interpreting laws, especially concerning contractor obligations; forging closer ties with communities in Afghanistan; handling detainees; and administrative work.

Weiner got a call before Christmas that she would be getting orders soon to be called up.

Weiner says her job in Iraq was to have been commerce officer, providing money to local Iraqi leaders.

That gave her pause, not only because she was not trained for the job, but also because she is of Japanese, Korean and Jewish ancestry.

"They were going to have me negotiate money transactions with Iraqi warlords. A woman of Jewish and East Asian descent to try to talk to men about money in a country where women aren't always allowed to handle money," Weiner says.

Weiner's record and fitness reports before she was called up to IA duty indicate anything but a shrinking violet. She had earned two overseas service ribbons, commendation and achievement medals and was part of a Meritorious Unit Commendation.

After graduating from Stanford in 2001, Weiner started her career aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Essex, a vessel second in size only to aircraft carriers and which transports Marine landing forces. She was serving overseas during the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

She received glowing fitness reports:

"Assigned to arduous sea duty ...," her commander wrote in one review. "Outstanding officer and Navy professional! On the fast track! Assign only to the most challenging jobs!"

She left active duty in August 2004, receiving high marks in her final evaluation in all categories but professional expertise.

By 2005, Weiner as a reservist worked as a research liaison officer at the prestigious Office of Naval Research. Her detachment was responsible for managing research in underwater unmanned vehicles and weaponry. She also served as the unit's public information officer. Her fitness reports continued to average "above standards" or "greatly exceeds standards." A commander called her "an excellent officer" and "a highly motivated self-starter."

Her last good report was November 2007, this time newly assigned to a joint service unit of the Selective Service System in New Orleans.

"She is most strongly recommended for promotion and greater responsibility in the Naval Reserve," her commander wrote.

It all unraveled on Jan. 9 when she received orders to be called up.

She agonized over the policy and her own convictions, readiness and obligations as an officer. The job seemed to her a random call for a warm body.

"I was not afraid of dying; I was afraid of acting out of weakness," she said. "It would have been easier to just go along with it." Weiner was to report Jan. 28. She was depressed, and she tried to call local Navy lawyers for advice. "I was told they could do nothing because I'm a reservist" with her headquarters in New Orleans, she said.

She turned to GI Rights hotline, a nonprofit organization at www.objector.net that offers legal help to servicemen and women, especially to those refusing to go to war.

Weiner found a lawyer and filed a request for personal hardship, In a conference call, her commanding offer was angry at her, she said. "I never got to tell them why I was refusing to deploy," she said. He ordered her report to New Orleans.

Weiner said she refused to report while her request for exemption was in the pipeline. Counselors and lawyers seemed unfamiliar with how to handle officers refusing to report, having handled mostly Army enlisted personnel.

A Navy official tried to reach her at her parents' home. Weiner was told to report voluntarily or risk arrest and being transported in shackles.

"My dad said, 'We support you. They are trying to send you to an Army position in Iraq. I understand.' "

Weiner put her jobs and a graduate program in bioethics on hold. She said she was preparing in to pack for New Orleans on the night Everett police arrived at her door.

Weiner said she was booked and strip searched and did nothing to resist, and credits jail and military authorities who handled her arrest with "acting very professionally." Though friends and the GI Rights people knew of her situation, she wanted no action or protest. " I wanted to know what the Navy will do." Military police took over and escorted her in shackles, walking to help her conceal them and avoid attention through the airports from Seattle and in New Orleans. "The staff was kind and wonderful to me," she said.

She was flown to New Orleans on a Friday night, and the Navy was ready for her: Face detention, then a court-martial or accept an other-than-honorable discharge,

a separation from the service in a middle ground, ranking below honorable and general discharges but above bad conduct and dishonorable discharges.

Weiner said she mulled whether how much it might affect her later life. Wanting to teach and write after graduate school, she opted for the discharge. She was flown home the next day. Her final fitness report dated Feb. 20, 2008, sharply contrasts her earlier ones.

"Lt. Weiner's failure to report ...was counter to good order and discipline, negatively affected the command climate and represents a failure to live up to the Navy core values of honor, courage and commitment. Lt. Weiner effectively put her personal desires above the needs of the Navy team and the nation ...Lt. Weiner is most strongly recommended for separation from the Navy."

The episode still makes her emotional both in what she gave up and for the support she has received. Weiner feels she showed honor, courage, commitment. She wants to continue to serve her community, perhaps to take apply her studies in bioethics into ensuring the safety of the food we eat.

"I want people to know about IAs, but there's a good side," she says. "The Navy did the best it could. I have no hard feelings. We are there to serve -- we serve the constitution."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: cindysheehanfan; rotc; sabrinamweiner; usn; weiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2008 8:35:51 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Weiner”. Appropriate.


2 posted on 04/18/2008 8:39:37 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Charlton Heston & Ronald Reagan - my two favorite Presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

I thought so too and the writer tries to make her out a hero.


3 posted on 04/18/2008 8:43:46 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: jazusamo
For her convictions, she was thrown in jail,

Incorrect. She was court martialed for disobeying an order.

5 posted on 04/18/2008 8:53:59 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Kamiak High School near Everett

The water ?


6 posted on 04/18/2008 8:54:29 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sabrina Weiner had a blog for some time:
http://www.infinitedragon.blogspot.com/

And I can’t think of a rational reason to send a East Asian/Jewish woman into a situation like that.


7 posted on 04/18/2008 8:57:47 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
She disobeyed orders and is willing to put her personal "feelings" above her legal, constitutional orders and the interests of this nation. Pathetic.

She is unfit for command and should be drummed out.


WEINER. YOU GO GIRL!
It'll be okay, you and I both know something that all those bitter rural, religious, gun-toting folks don't know.

OBAMA'S CIRCLE OF FRIENDS AND SUPPORT

8 posted on 04/18/2008 8:58:13 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Today she is scraping by in Everett"

You mean near death, with garbage dumpsters providing her only nourishment?

Nope.

"living frugally, tutoring high school kids in math and is enrolled in graduate studies at the Alden March Bioethics Institute based at the Albany Medical College in New York."

Oh. Working and going to grad school. I think she'll be fine.

9 posted on 04/18/2008 8:58:42 PM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Exactly! You don’t disobey a direct order in the military and walk away, there will be repercussions.


10 posted on 04/18/2008 8:58:42 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

She served her time, and country...She had a beef with the machine. They should of given her a General Discharged under honorable conditions, IMO.


11 posted on 04/18/2008 8:59:55 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I understand the point she claims, I just don’t believe that she wasn’t allowed to voice it to her superiors.

As an officer, she should be fully aware of Defense policy that states you are always subject to the needs of the service.


12 posted on 04/18/2008 9:04:05 PM PDT by papasmurf (Unless I post a link to resource, what I post is opinion, regardless of how I spin it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
"I can’t think of a rational reason..."

It was the first and last time I crossed my superior's decision on matter after I received the obvious incoming responses to the above comment.

13 posted on 04/18/2008 9:04:08 PM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Comments are only my opinion:

She sounds like a sharp person. The ONR does not allow slackers to darken their door.
It also does sound like she has created a problem where one did not previously exist. She was given an assignment. She chose to disregard those order based on her personal eval of the assignment. Rather than follow orders and then make her suggestions/recommendations known, she committed one of the cardinal military sins - she voluntarily missed a troop movement. This is a major bad thing. She knew this.
She, as far as this is written, is not sounding weasily or refusing to accept the situation...but I am skeptical in my thinking that her underlying motive may be that she is viewing this 'call-up' as interfering with her 'career-path' rather than the reasons stated.

To me, its a fairly objectively written article. Interesting to see how this plays out.
14 posted on 04/18/2008 9:04:33 PM PDT by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Hasn’t been a new post on that blog for almost 3 years.


15 posted on 04/18/2008 9:08:06 PM PDT by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

I believe you’re correct, she knew what she was doing and was fully aware of the consequences being an officer.


16 posted on 04/18/2008 9:10:20 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Working with the structure, including winning over the tribal leaders, is causing us to turn the tide in Iraq. Some Moslems aren't going to listen to the Al-Queda nutjobs.
17 posted on 04/18/2008 9:12:39 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hell of an officer. Feels she gets to pick and choose what she will and won’t do? They shouldn’t have given her the general. They should have courtmartialed her a*s, given her six months and a DD.

CPT., ARMOR
MACV, Class of ‘71


18 posted on 04/18/2008 9:18:30 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

“That gave her pause, not only because she was not trained for the job, but also because she is of Japanese, Korean and Jewish ancestry. “They were going to have me negotiate money transactions with Iraqi warlords. A woman of Jewish and East Asian descent to try to talk to men about money in a country where women aren’t always allowed to handle money,” Weiner says.”

1942

We’ll sir, I agree that those Japanese Cruisers are steaming up Iron Bottom sound, but my position as cook hardly qualifies me for combat on this Destroyer,yes I am trained to serve on the damage control party , but really, wouldn’t my skills be better served ashore?... In Miami? Or New York? Hoboken?”

How many many times do yah think that conversation happened in the middle of that war?


19 posted on 04/18/2008 9:23:03 PM PDT by redstateconfidential (If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
come on now....she did precisely the honorable thing to do up against something she did not feel she should do..

its not like she hid out in Canada, or blasted Bush or blasted the Navy.....

I'll give her credit for being upfront about it all...

and it sounds like the Navy is losing one good officier....

20 posted on 04/18/2008 9:24:22 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson