Skip to comments.
Physicists Renew Claim, in New Experiment, of Detecting Dark Matter Particles
NY Times ^
| April 17, 2008
| DENNIS OVERBYE
Posted on 04/17/2008 11:38:51 PM PDT by neverdem
A team of Italian and Chinese physicists on Wednesday renewed a controversial claim that they had detected the mysterious dark matter particles that astronomers say swaddle the galaxies in halos and direct the evolution of the universe.
The team, called Dama, from DArk MAtter, and led by Rita Bernabei of the University of Rome, has maintained since 2000 that a yearly modulation in the rate of flashes in a detector nearly a mile underneath the Gran Sasso mountain in Italy is the result of the Earths passage through a wind of dark matter particles as it goes around the Sun. Other groups of hunters of dark matter have just as consistently failed to find any evidence of the putative particles.
At a meeting in Venice, Dr. Bernabei reported that a new, bigger experiment named Dama/Libra had now observed the same modulation. No other experiment whose result can be directly compared in a model-independent way is available so far, she said. The findings increase the chances that the modulation is real, outside dark matter experts say.
Dark matter has taunted astronomers and physicists ever since the astronomer Fritz Zwicky of the California Institute of Technology pointed out in the 1930s that clusters of galaxies appear to be missing enough visible matter to hold them together gravitationally. Speculation has centered on the possibility that the dark matter consists of hypothetical elementary particles left over from the Big Bang so-called WIMPs, or weakly interacting massive particles, that are immune to most forces of nature and so can pass through us and the Earth like ghosts.
The Dama team uses sodium iodide, which flashes light when a WIMP smashes into it, as a detector. The first experiment, which ran from 1996 to 2002, had 220 pounds of sodium iodide; the second which...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astronomy; darkenergy; darkforce; darkmatter; physics; stringtheory; wimps
1
posted on
04/17/2008 11:38:51 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
2
posted on
04/18/2008 12:20:46 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
To: neverdem
Theoretically, particles can exist that are not affected by any of the known forces. Nuetrinos are only weakly interacting, which means that only the weak nuclear force can affect them, making them the most elusive particles that can be detected. They are extremely low-mass however, not heavy enough to account for dark matter. Particles that are not affected by any of the known forces, except gravity, would be essentially “ghost particles”. There would be no way to detect them except fot their gravitational influence.
To: neverdem
4
posted on
04/18/2008 2:48:51 AM PDT
by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: Telepathic Intruder
“Particles that are not affected by any of the known forces, except gravity, would be essentially ghost particles. There would be no way to detect them except fot their gravitational influence.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>..........................
make far enough away, small enough, or back millions of years and you can publish anything you wish..Scams by any other name are Scams..who can dispute Dark matter as there is no way to detect it?? ans: I can, this is baloney. can I get a federal $$ grant to study my theory: The universe is here because G_D thinks it is and he is the “Matter” that holds the universe together..I'll get a grant about as easy as Scientists who disparage Man made global warming.
5
posted on
04/18/2008 4:36:39 AM PDT
by
shadowgovernment
(From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
To: shadowgovernment
make far enough away, small enough, or back millions of years and you can publish anything you wish..Scams by any other name are Scams..
And at one time we didnt have telescopes strong enough to physically observe other solar systems and planets but astronomers theorized that they existed. But I guess that was all a scam
.
6
posted on
04/18/2008 5:25:11 AM PDT
by
Caramelgal
(Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
To: shadowgovernment
he is the "Matter" that holds the universe together
I suppose it depends on how you choose to percieve God. If he is everything, then whatever you look at is only a part of him. There is a difference, however, in how I percieve God and how I percieve the universe. One is the creator, another is the creation. And a clock created by God might still be able to tick without him having to cause each tic; he just needs to wind it up.
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
Thanks neverdem.
8
posted on
04/18/2008 11:55:30 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
To: neverdem
evidence of the putative particles They are looking for dark matter particles and their machine has given some readings so they must be of dark matter particles. Sure, we can just accept that. No problem and Pres Putin is busy with his gymnast right now so he won't miss his putative particles.
9
posted on
04/18/2008 12:04:44 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Caramelgal
“And at one time we didnt have telescopes strong enough to physically observe other solar systems and planets but astronomers theorized that they existed. But I guess that was all a scam
.”
>>>>>>>>...........................
the history of how science is funded is an interesting topic, today we have a system of grants (tax money) with gate keepers awarding the money without much oversight..
Politics and fads (man made global warming) and save the planet fads have sucked money from basic research that is practical (think Tom Edison as an example)..and has resulted in so called science justifying the death of the incandescent light bulb via legislation..the implications
of scams in science are obvious.
10
posted on
04/19/2008 5:28:30 AM PDT
by
shadowgovernment
(From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson