Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank
"... Washoe County Sheriff Mike Haley interprets the confidentiality requirement so broadly that he won't even comment on whether the firearms instructor faced any discipline for signing off on the governor's permit."

That's my sheriff! He signs all my NFA forms by proxy. Guy reminds me of Oliver North.

About Nevada's supposedly 'goofy' qualification requirement for CCWs: Yes, we do make you qualify with each individual automatic pistol you wish to carry, but revolvers aren't specified. We also insist on training and competency, plus eight hours of classroom instruction on liability, deadly force, justification, and firearms laws. We have higher standards in Nevada and for other states to have reciprocity with us, you must meet our high standards to some degree of satisfaction. We also run periodic background checks on the CCW holder. Information is kept confidential and CCWs in Nevada are 'shall issue'. We have 'Castle Doctrine' which extends to your vehicles.

Is this unreasonable and restrictive? Hardly. In fact, I'm proud to regard our requirements as 'well regulated', in the spirit of the Second Amendment. Nevada does it right.

12 posted on 04/17/2008 1:20:30 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid
Is this unreasonable and restrictive? Hardly. In fact, I'm proud to regard our requirements as 'well regulated', in the spirit of the Second Amendment. Nevada does it right.

Seems like I heard somewhere that the gaming industry had something to do with the drafting of the NV law. My vague recollection is that it had something to do with security guards.

From my perspective it does seem somewhat over-regulated.

15 posted on 04/17/2008 1:39:22 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution ? 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
I've been in organizations that that would in no way be held as qualified. Matter of fact, most Americans wouldn't ‘qualify’ and yet it was felt it was minimum qualifications. I guess you support decades of hair splitting court cases brought by anti-gunners.

Any citizens is qualified as a citizen. For me this includes felons. The only way and the only organization that control and remove rights and liberties are prisons, by order of a Judge. Other than that, you are free. Free as in no charge or master.

17 posted on 04/17/2008 1:48:48 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson