;^)
Posted on 04/16/2008 7:10:41 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
In Part II, I want to take a closer look at Obama’s international support, their idea of “change” and what role the international community expects Obama to play in serving their agendas in the world.
Who’s Agent of Change?
”We like Mr. Obama, and we hope that he will win the elections.” – a sentiment shared by many American Obama supporters, however this statement was made by Middle East terror organization, Hamas’ top political adviser in the Gaza Strip, Ahmed Yousuf.
In an interview with WorldNetDaily, the isolated Hamas terrorist organization expressed “hope” Sen. Barack Obama will win the presidential elections and “change” America’s foreign policy.
”I hope Mr. Obama and the Democrats will change the political discourse. ... I do believe [Obama] is like John Kennedy, a great man with a great principal. And he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community, but not with humiliation and arrogance,” Yousuf said, speaking from Gaza.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
;^)
Obama is dangerous, and the other two major candidates are going to move the ball in that direction also.
This from the same people who brought us the highly principled, divine act of teenagers using suicide bombs as a way to achieve greatness by blowing up Jews-they consider to be pigs and dogs- on buses and in restaurants.
Obama always seems to attract the most radical pieces of garbage to walk the earth, yet when this is brought up everyone on the left screams bloody murder.
Traitors!!!!
this is the problem
imagine if a white republican had been going to a so called church like obama
imagine, if the white republican had a wife like obama and her racist comments
imaine if the white republican had terrorists as friends
imagine if the white republican had the same views as obama but instead of black then it would be white
the list is endless
yet the media have shown themselves to be totally unprofessional and objectable
Never inmy life time have I seen usch unprofessionalism as I have in this election
Obama should have been asked to leave the senate never mind running for the nominee
We also know that McCain is less than wholly conservative. But some actually think the three can be honestly compared and that is false.
There is a laundry list of issues and reasons why McCain is in no way comparable to the other two. The nonsense being spread by “conservatives” angry that they didn't get “their guy” has to stop.
Clinton and Obambi are both EVIL anti-America to the core.
I can spend the next four years fighting McCain on the short list of things I disagree with him on, or the next four years watching Clinton-Obama do serious harm to ALL the things I care about.
There is no other way to see it...and NO other options available!
AMEN!
I agree, but Bush and McCain will have to be blocked on this one as well...
Back to the drawing board for 2010 and 2012.
But for 2008, I’d rather block McCain on four or five items than try to block Clinton-Obama on a hundred Marxist initiatives.
Either way, conservatives better be working for control of at least the Senate...
Juan McVain’s organization got money from Soros.
He led the worst assault on free speech in many years, if not in American history.
He and his allies killed the chances to approve several of President Bush’s most conservative judicial picks.
He’s for bringing terrorists to this country, closing Gitmo, and ending aggressive interrogations. He wants to put them through the court system, the same way that the Klintoon Administration wanted to handle terrorism.
He’s the leading open-borders guy in Congress and has said that if a bill like the one he and Ted (hic) Kennedy co-sponsored came to him, he would sign it.
He has said he would NOT appoint judges like Alito.
He is co-sponsoring dangerous “global warming” legislation that would constrict our lifestyle.
He voted against the Bush tax cuts TWICE, using class-warfare rhetoric.
And those aren’t the only reasons why conservatives oppose him. Just a partial list.
Of course, Republibots (i.e., those who would support literlly ANYTHING if it comes with an “R” after it)find this offensive. They operate on the assumption that they, not I, own my vote.
Isn't his cousin corrupt-er-"helping" that country already
So, vote for Obama or Clinton, since you clearly believe McCain is more dangerous.
You’re wrong of course, but you have the right to be wrong.
McCain, because he does all the things I cited while looking like he's trying to reach out to us, is dangerous in a different way. I think he's vain and weak. Taht's not the ame as being a Marxist, but it is dangerous. A McCain administrationwill advance liberal ends, IMO, not conservatiev ones. As with Nixon and Bush Sr., we get all the rhetoric and they get all the action.
(BTW, McCain told the San Francisco Chroicle that he would be against overtunrning Roe v. Wade.)
There are better alternatives. Keyes would be a better President than Juan McVain; Barr might be also, for that matter. There are real conservative alternatives to vote for.
When you support real conservatives, you tell whoever wins that this is the kidn of policy you want. When you vote for country-club RINOs, you tell whoever wins to act like a country-club RINO.
Il Duce and The Doofus!
exactly
I disagree with MCain on a lot of thing s especially immigration , torture, gitmo etc but to see the other two candiates ruining this country especially obama then it would destroy me too inside.
the media have done a great injustice to the American public,. the voters for obama have proved they are thick and are like sheep.
notice many are college kids who pay no tax, no mortguage, no kids , no nothing really,, they are treating this election like American idol and just proves to me anyway that
to vote youm have to eithe rpay tax, or answer 5 questions on where the candidates stand for instance the questions would be like
which candidate wants to raise your taxes
which candidate want illegals to come here and have open borders
which candidate wants to reduce our military
which candidate wants to let homosexuals marry and adopt kids
which candidates want to never use nuclear weapons even if we get nuclear attacked
or maybe have both pay taxes, show proof of who you are and answer 5 questions just before you can vote, you get the questions wrong then come back later and try again
guaranteed the libs and the dems would never get into power again if we had those.
It will not be as overt as you describe. He will bring a false peace that is worked out with the terrorsits, and slowly we will be enslaved into the politically correct, community oriented service and redistribution of wealth so that we cannot move around, or keep our individualism. It will be indoctrination to accept this peaceful one-world religion that if you discent will cause your death. At first it will seem the utopia described by the dems but underneath is the devil and his destruction. We have been in the indoctrination stages of their political correctness, and censorship for a long time, and many have already drank the KoolAid.
EXACTLY!
Yes you did. You said you would not vote for McCain. As it stands, the only way to keep Clinton-Obama out of the Oval Office is to “vote for McCain.” Therefore, one must conclude that since you won't vote AGAINST Clinton-Obama, you must see them as less dangerous than McCain. There is NO other way to see it, and I am FAR from a GOP spin doctor. I'm a conservative realist.
“McCain, because he does all the things I cited while looking like he's trying to reach out to us, is dangerous in a different way.”
Of course, a fact no conservative needs to have regurgitated over and over. That's why conservatives had better be working to take control of congress in order to block whomever becomes president.
“I think he's vain and weak. That’s not the same as being a Marxist, but it is dangerous.”
Exactly...
“A McCain administration will advance liberal ends, IMO, not conservative ones.”
Obviously, that depends on the issue at hand. McCain is in fact very conservative on many conservative issues. Just not all of them. His opponents are conservative on none of them.
“(BTW, McCain told the San Francisco Chroicle that he would be against overtunrning Roe v. Wade.)”
Vote pandering - he also has a very solid pro-life voting record in congress for many years.
“There are better alternatives.”
And NONE of them wont the nomination, nor do any of them have the power to knock McCain out of his nomination. So, no there isn't another viable alternative.
“Keyes would be a better President than Juan McVain; Barr might be also, for that matter. There are real conservative alternatives to vote for.”
Neither you name is 110% conservative either. Keyes in the one Republican in America with less chance of becoming president than Ron Paul, and Barr is not even a candidate yet, and if he becomes a candidate, he will be a 3rd party candidate, which makes him only a potential Ross Perot at best. Both men have skeletons in their closet to, BTW.
“When you support real conservatives, you tell whoever wins that this is the kidn of policy you want.”
Yes, and we did that, but we “conservatives” could NOT agree on who was the “real conservative” and none of them beat McCain in the primary as a result. Now, not one of them has the power to stop a Clinton - Obama administration, not matter how great you think they are. Only McCain has that power at this moment.
“When you vote for country-club RINOs, you tell whoever wins to act like a country-club RINO.”
Not if you tie their hands with a truly conservative senate at the same time...
No, if you read carfully (a tough task for those with partisan blinders on), Inever said anything of the kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.