At least it wasn't a big error, only a factor of 100. And it wasn't about an important subject, only a killer asteroid. Yeah NASA!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Straight Vermonter
Gives me plenty of confidence in their global warming predictions. /s
To: Straight Vermonter
america's public schools --- why bother with education when there is so much eco-brainwashing and social engineering to be done.
math and science isn't as important as having american kids learn about global warming and the activist gay agenda.
3 posted on
04/15/2008 4:35:37 PM PDT by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Straight Vermonter
"the young whizzkid had got it right.: Rut row, NASA needs to get it's collective head out of it's a$$.
How scary is this?
4 posted on
04/15/2008 4:36:57 PM PDT by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: Straight Vermonter
Well this didn’t tell us anything we didn’t know about N.A.S.A. by now. Beyond that, yawn...
5 posted on
04/15/2008 4:44:01 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
To: Straight Vermonter
This kid will make a great bookie!
7 posted on
04/15/2008 4:45:42 PM PDT by
BullDog108
(A Smith & Wesson beats four aces)
To: Straight Vermonter
There is a lot of empty space up there. What is the probability of a Satellite-Comet collision?
8 posted on
04/15/2008 4:46:14 PM PDT by
fso301
To: Straight Vermonter
Well good, now can we turn the Global Warming B/S over to the second graders for a definitive answer?
9 posted on
04/15/2008 4:47:02 PM PDT by
Gator113
(Hey Obama, "I drink your milkshake.")
To: Straight Vermonter
Putting on my tinfoil hat, I wonder if they just didn’t want us to know how high the odds are.
10 posted on
04/15/2008 4:47:43 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
The only plan now is to catalog these things. There is no hardware in space to deal with something that emerges from space on a three-day collision course, which is what will get us. It will come up unexpected and it will probably be a swarm rather than a single asteroid.
11 posted on
04/15/2008 4:48:17 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Straight Vermonter
Obviously it was yet another kilometer to mile conversion mistake by NASA ;)
12 posted on
04/15/2008 4:49:57 PM PDT by
SengirV
To: Straight Vermonter
The schoolboy took into consideration the risk of Apophis running into one or more of the 40,000 satellites orbiting Earth during its path close to the planet on April 13 2029. Those satellites travel at 3.07 kilometres a second (1.9 miles), at up to 35,880 kilometres above earth -- and the Apophis asteroid will pass by earth at a distance of 32,500 kilometres.
Does this mean that NASA did not take this risk in to account.
If it does it seems like a rather large oversight. I as a relatively uneducated individual thought about the possibility when Apophis close approach was reported last year.
13 posted on
04/15/2008 4:50:55 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Straight Vermonter
The schoolboy took into consideration the risk of Apophis running into one or more of the 40,000 satellites orbiting Earth during its path close to the planet on April 13 2029. Those satellites travel at 3.07 kilometres a second (1.9 miles), at up to 35,880 kilometres above earth -- and the Apophis asteroid will pass by earth at a distance of 32,500 kilometres.
If the asteroid strikes a satellite in 2029, that will change its trajectory making it hit earth on its next orbit in 2036.
This raises the possibility that a satellite could intentionally be used to alter the course of the asteroid.
15 posted on
04/15/2008 4:53:44 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Straight Vermonter
"
whilst creating a thick cloud of dust..." Just how would a cloud of dust rise from the Atlantic ocean? - Is there anything NASA can get right anymore? They sure blew it when they conveniently forgot about the missing data from Siberian stations and arrived at the conclusion that we were warming when we were cooling.
17 posted on
04/15/2008 4:54:37 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Straight Vermonter
Not surprising. Today’s NASA is a shadow of yesterday’s.
To: Straight Vermonter
First Hubble, now this sh*t, WTF? Everyone makes mistakes but these care kinda important. NASA needs a better QA program now! Come on boys....get your sh*t together....
20 posted on
04/15/2008 5:01:04 PM PDT by
homeguard
((Charlie Don't Surf!))
To: Straight Vermonter
NASA is broken beyond belief. Take this from a former contractor to them. They cannot find their a$$(s) with the Hubble.
22 posted on
04/15/2008 5:05:31 PM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: Straight Vermonter
Both NASA and Marquardt agree that if the asteroid does collide with earth, it will create a ball of iron and iridium 320 metres (1049 feet) wide and weighing 200 billion tonnes, which will crash into the Atlantic Ocean.How in the h%!! can they know exactly where the thing will land when they don't know if it will even deflect off a satellite or not?
24 posted on
04/15/2008 5:16:16 PM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(This is an Obama-nation!)
To: Straight Vermonter
25 posted on
04/15/2008 5:17:32 PM PDT by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: Straight Vermonter
“However did they win...”
28 posted on
04/15/2008 5:26:23 PM PDT by
Tea in the Harbor
(The fault is not in our stars, but in ourselves.)
To: Straight Vermonter
Both NASA and Marquardt agree that if the asteroid does collide with earth, it will create a ball of iron and iridium 320 metres (1049 feet) wide and weighing 200 billion tonnes, which will crash into the Atlantic Ocean. The shockwaves from that would create huge tsunami waves, destroying both coastlines and inland areas Hmmm..This would mean that Washington D.C. would be destroyed.
So if a satellite was intentionally diverted.....
30 posted on
04/15/2008 5:32:47 PM PDT by
dragnet2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson