Posted on 04/15/2008 8:28:04 AM PDT by RightWhale
Beijing (AFP) April 14, 2008 Chinese authorities uncovered 31,700 cases of illegal land grabs in four months in a crackdown on one of the major factors behind rising social unrest across the country, state media reported on Monday. The unlawful land grabs were discovered between September 15 last year and January 15, and led to 2,864 people being punished, Xinhua news agency quoted Zhang Pu of the Ministry of Land and Resources as saying.
Land illegally seized amounted to 224,000 hectares (553,000 acres) in total, according to Xinhua, nearly 60 percent of which was used before getting government approval.
The seizures reflect a widespread problem that sees local government authorities collude with businessmen to force people off their property to make way for lucrative developments.
It is a phenomenon which extends from the cities to rural areas, with residents kicked out of their homes or off their land for little or no compensation.
As part of the crackdown authorities retook or demolished unlawful buildings and seized or fined people a total of four billion yuan (570 million dollars), Xinhua said.
Human rights activists say corruption is so endemic that the government can do little to solve the problem, even if it genuinely wants to stop the land grabs, which have been a big part of the nation's modernisation drive.
According to figures from the Ministry of Public Security, there were 87,000 protests across the country in 2005, up 50 percent from two years earlier, many of them over land grabs.
The amount of land illegally grabbed last year was up 68 percent from 2006, according to the news agency.
John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer
one of the factors behind rising social unrest in the country, you say? Tell me, would depriving a person of their right to life, liberty, or property make them restless?
” local government authorities collude with businessmen to force people off their property to make way for lucrative developments.”
Hmmmmm........ That does sound familiar!
” local government authorities collude with businessmen to force people off their property to make way for lucrative developments.”
It’s OK if the head guys in Beiging do it though.
Tibet.
See, that’s completely different. If a gov’t takes a farm and gives it to a developer that’s illegal. If a gov’t takes an entire country and keeps it that’s, uh, something or other, but not eminent domain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.