Posted on 04/13/2008 4:11:45 PM PDT by STE=Q
Obama, speaking to a group of supporters in San Francisco, CA. , recently said:
"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." -- Obama
So lets see what we have here?
Obama says: One goes into ‘these small towns in Pennsylvania’ and like ‘small towns in the Midwest … jobs have been gone now for 25 years… and the ‘Clinton administration… Bush administration… each successive administration has said that these communities are gonna (sic) regenerate and they have not’.
So, in a nutshell, Clinton, Bush, and other ‘successive administrations’, were unable to successfully predict the economic future of these communities.
Obama here implies, that -- when he is elected President -- his’ administration will have superior prognosticative skills, than the former administrations have heretofore had.
Frankly, I doubt anyone can do this -- at least with any degree of certainty.
I think we would have as good a shot at predicting our economic future, using a psychic hotline, as we would depending on this, or that, administration to inform us.
Does anyone think these sorts of economic predictions -- other then getting a candidate elected, or keeping him or her in office -- are practical?
Would any reasonable man or woman think so?
Obama then opines… ‘they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.’
So according to Obama:
The aforementioned people are out of work.
They are struggling to make ends meet.
In short, they have been in an economic recession for around 25 years!
They -- according to the bleak picture Obama paints -- are huddling defensively, perhaps in a corner of their ranch or house (figuratively speaking) as they “cling” to their last earthly possessions: a bible, a rifle, and maybe (by implication) a copy of The United States Constitution.
Now people HAVE, in fact, lost jobs because of ILLEGAL immigration, and UNFAIR trade, but they still have their faith in God, and their constitutional right to bear arms.
So rather than having a profound respect for those patriotic Americans that have given their lives so that we, as Americans, can proudly “cling” to those precious liberties, -- passed on to us from our founding father’s, and inscribed in our Constitution -- Obama implies that if these wretched people just had the palliative of a job, then they wouldn’t need those old, out dated things… like bibles, guns, and religion!
So what sort of conclusions can we draw from these statements of his?
(1) Obama deliberately, underhandedly, said what he said.
Perhaps some esoteric attack on ‘middle’ America -- that only a 'sinister' and 'ingenious' mind like Obama's could concoct?
Or:
(2) Obama is, perhaps, the most profoundly ignorant American, to have ever run for President of the United States?
My first thought was answer number one but, until we know for sure who, if anyone, is 'pulling Obama's chain,' number two seems the easiest (using his own words) to demonstrate -- at least at this time.
Which leads me to…
(3) He is an arrogant, condescending, elitists snob, with a typical left-wing world view.
Qualities -- along with a pronounced tendency toward verbal-flatulence -- he obviously very much “clings” to!
Message to Mr. Obama:
The “common” man, whom you and your ilk show so much disdain for, knows the difference between:
One who is crass and one who has class.
You sir, have clearly and indubitably demonstrated, for all to see, that you exemplify the former kind of person -- rather than the later!
Truly, there are some things that money can’t buy.
Class is one of them!
Obama the open book?
Is he a mystery or hiding in plain sight?
One things for sure:
His ability two put both feet firmly in his mouth -- at the same time! -- calls into question his diplomatic skills, to say the least!
If he can so insult his fellow Americans, what sort of damage could he do in the international community -- during these difficult times?
And you just might have to relocate these days.
dickheadsayswhat? :)
Good question. I saw a segment on FoxNews yesterday where they interviewed a Republican who was an Illinois State Senator during the same time Obama was there in the same capacity. Obama's voting record was very interesting: On 8 (I think) occasions Obama would vote one way, then wait until the voting was done and say something like, "I pressed 'yes' when I meant to vote 'no.'" Strange to say the least.
“I pressed ‘yes’ when I meant to vote ‘no.’ Strange to say the least.”
Sometimes Obama can be pretty spooky!(no racism intended!)
LOL!
And who knew that by exercising two of our constitional rights we were participating in “decisive politics”? I vote for #2 because I still don’t think him or his campaign understand what they said. If he had he would’ve profusely apologized and not given that lame “you are too stoopid to understand what I meant” non apology tht he gave.
Obama has had two jobs--as "community organizer" in Chicago and as a politician in the Illinois legislature and in the U.S. Senate. He has done almost nothing in his current position other than run for President. Did he ever do anything as community organizer or member of the Illinois legislature that actually helped anyone? Has he ever benefited anyone other than himself, his family, or his financial supporters?
“I vote for #2 because I still don’t think him or his campaign understand what they said”
Unbelievable, is it not?
Your vote is duly recorded!
He is tolling the death knell bell for this country. He is an american intellectual quasimodo.
Obama the islamist
How about Barry the Closet Muslim? Dumping on “typical” Americans wasn’t the only bombshell Barry let loose on the Billionaires in SF. Seems Barry did a little traveling while in college...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/obamas-college.html
“Did he ever do anything as community organizer or member of the Illinois legislature that actually helped anyone?”
That’s a very good question.
I once new a community organizer that did help people.
I can’t remember her name, but if she ran for office, I would certainly be able to say something on her behalf.
Where ARE those that Obama — supposedly — “helped?”
Thanks for your post!
Nope, Obama the Marxist.
He’s fiends with an old Weatherman, and his ‘gaffe’ is straight Marxist claptrap. The usual jargon would be “the American prolateriate has succumbed to false consciousness” with some remarks about “the opiate of the masses” thrown in. He reduces everything to economics—people want firearms, not to defend themselves, but because they are economically downtrodden; people are religious, not because they actually care about transcendant realities, but because they are economically downtrodden, etc.
“Workers of the world unite,” just doesn’t sell anymore, but Obama’s message is just the same old leftist drivel repackaged.
OOOPPPPSS sorry folks that should be “devisive poltics” not “decisive politics”.
“So when I speak about having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa —knowing the leaders is not important — what I know is the people...”
Yeah, he knows these people better then he knows the American people... just what the doctor ordered, not!
Thanks for posting this informative link!
Pennsylvania is in the Midwest? I live in Kansas, and we consider our state to be in the Midwest. Sounds like he’s describing typical small towns with typical white people, again.
“’the American proletariat has succumbed to false consciousness’ with some remarks about ‘the opiate of the masses’ thrown in. He reduces everything to economics —people want firearms, not to defend themselves, but because they are economically downtrodden; people are religious, not because they actually care about transcendent realities, but because they are economically downtrodden, etc.”
What you have written fits in PERFECTLY with his words... words that reflect his — and his “progressive” comrade’s — world view.
Thanks!
Says it all!
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.